二元可变后缘翼型的鲁棒优化设计

郑宇宁; 邱志平; 黄仁; 苑凯华

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0387

二元可变后缘翼型的鲁棒优化设计

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0387

1.
北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100191
2. 北京机电工程研究所, 北京 100074

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(11372025,11432002);国防基础科研计划(A0420132101,JCKY2013601B);高等学校学科创新引智计划(B07009)

详细信息

作者简介:
郑宇宁(1990—),男,陕西西安人,博士研究生,ynzheng@buaa.edu.cn

通讯作者:
黄仁(1986—),男,湖南怀化人,博士,huangren@buaa.edu.cn,主要研究方向为气动弹性力学.

中图分类号: V211⁺.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 1191
- HTML全文浏览量: 118
- PDF下载量: 649
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-06-30
- 修回日期: 2014-09-19
- 网络出版日期: 2015-05-20

Robust design optimization of a two-dimensional airfoil with deformable trailing edge

1.
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
2. Beijing Electron-Mechanical Engineering Institute, Beijing 100074, China

摘要

摘要: 为了改善二元可变后缘翼型在外界条件变化时的气动稳定性,提出了一种考虑不确定性的鲁棒性优化方法.在类别形状函数变换(CST)方法的基础上,建立了二元可变后缘翼型的参数化模型.探讨了确定性优化方法与鲁棒性优化方法的区别.充分考虑翼型几何形状和来流马赫数的不确定性,进行了最大化升阻比均值、最小化升阻比标准差的鲁棒优化设计.对于优化后的可变后缘翼型,计算了变形所需的驱动能.结果表明:鲁棒性优化方法在提升翼型气动性能的同时降低了该性能对来流马赫数的敏感度,鲁棒性优化翼型所需的驱动能有所减少.
- CST方法 /
- 变后缘 /
- 不确定性 /
- 鲁棒性优化 /
- 驱动能
Abstract: In order to improve the aerodynamic stability of a two-dimensional airfoil with deformable trailing edge during the change of external conditions, a robust optimization method considering the uncertainty was proposed. Based on class-shape function transformation (CST) method, a parametric model was established to represent the geometry of a two-dimensional airfoil with a deformable trailing edge. The differences between robust optimization method and deterministic optimization method were discussed. Taking into account the uncertain airfoil geometry and inlet Mach number, the robust optimization method was applied to maximize the mean value of the lift-to-drag ratio and minimize its standard deviation. The actuation power requirement of the optimized airfoil with a deformable trailing edge was calculated. The results show that the robust optimization method can help to improve the aerodynamic performance of morphing airfoil and reduce the sensitivity of this performance to inlet Mach number simultaneously and to reduce the actuation power requirement of the robust optimal airfoil.
- class-shape function transformation (CST) method /
- deformable trailing edge /
- uncertainty /
- robust optimization /
- actuation power

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	Stanewsky E.Aerodynamic benefits of adaptive wing technology[J].Aerospace Science Technology,2000,4(7):439-452.
[2]	Smith J W,Lock W P,Payne G A.Variable-camber systems integration and operational performance of the AFTI/F-111 mission adaptive wing[M].Edwards:National Aeronautics and Space Administration,Office of Management,Scientific and Technical Information Program,1992:1-3.
[3]	De Gaspari A,Ricci S.Combining shape and structural optimization for the design of morphing airfoils[C]//2nd International Conference on Engineering Optimization.Lisbon:ENGOPT,2010:6-9.
[4]	陈钱,白鹏,尹维龙,等.可连续光滑偏转后缘的变弯度翼型气动特性分析[J].空气动力学学报,2010,28(1):46-53. Chen Q,Bai P,Yin W L,et al.Analysis on the aerodynamic characteristics of variable camber airfoils with continuous smooth morphing trailing edge[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2010,28(1): 46-53(in Chinese).
[5]	Luckring J M,Hemsch M J,Morrison J H.Uncertainty in computational aerodynamics,AIAA-2003-0409[R].Reston:AIAA,2003.
[6]	Huyse L,Padula S L,Lewis R M,et al.Probabilistic approach to free-form airfoil shape optimization under uncertainty[J].AIAA Journal,2002,40(9):1764-1772.
[7]	Padulo M,Campobasso M S,Guenov M D.Novel uncertainty propagation method for robust aerodynamic design[J].AIAA Journal,2011,49(3):530-543.
[8]	Kaul U K,Nguyen N T.Drag optimization study of variable camber continuous trailing edge flap(VCCTEF)using OVERFLOW,AIAA-2014-2444[R].Reston:AIAA,2014.
[9]	Kulfan B M,Bussoletti J E.“Fundamental”parametric geometry representations for aircraft component shapes,AIAA-2006-6948[R].Reston:AIAA,2006.
[10]	Kulfan B M. Universal parametric geometry representation method[J].Journal of Aircraft,2008,45(1):142-158.
[11]	Forster E,Sanders B.Modeling and sensitivity analysis of a variable geometry trailing edge control surface,AIAA-2003-1807[R].Reston:AIAA,2003.
[12]	Ladson C L,Hill A S,Johnson Jr W G.Pressure distributions from high Reynolds number transonic tests of an NACA 0012 airfoil in the Langley 0.3-meter transonic cryogenic tunnel,NASA-TM-100526[R].Washington,D.C.:NASA Langley Research Center,1987.
[13]	Andersen P B,Gaunaa M,Bak C,et al.A dynamic stall model for airfoils with deformable trailing edges[J].Wind Energy,2009,12(8):734-751.
[14]	柳杨,邱志平. 翼型气动性能鲁棒性优化设计[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2011,37(1):41-44. Liu Y,Qiu Z P.Airfoil robust design with uncertainty parameters[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2011,37(1):41-44(in Chinese).
[15]	Whitley D. A genetic algorithm tutorial[J].Statistics and Computing,1994,4(2):65-85.
[16]	穆雪峰,姚卫星,余雄庆,等.多学科设计优化中常用代理模型的研究[J].计算力学学报,2005,22(5):608-612. Mu X F,Yao W X,Yu X Q,et al.A survey of surrogate models used in MDO[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2005,22(5):608-612(in Chinese).
[17]	方开泰. 均匀设计与均匀设计表[M].北京:科学出版社,1994:2-9. Fang K T.Uniform design and uniform design table[M].Beijing:Science Press,1994:2-9(in Chinese).
[18]	丁继锋,李为吉,张勇,等.基于响应面的翼型稳健设计研究[J].空气动力学学报,2007,25(1):19-22. Ding J F,Li W J,Zhang Y,et al.Robust airfoil optimization based on response surface method[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2007,25(1):19-22(in Chinese).
[19]	Zingg D W,Elias S.Aerodynamic optimization under a range of operating conditions[J].AIAA Journal,2006,44(11):2787-2792.
[20]	Forster E,Sanders B,Eastep F.Synthesis of a variable geometry trailing edge control surface,AIAA-2003-1717[R].Reston:AIAA,2003.