Volume 40 Issue 4
Apr.  2014
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Rong Shuanglong, Li Chuanri, Xu Fei, et al. Method optimization of optimum measurement point selection in experiential modal analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(4): 536-543. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2013.0292(in Chinese)
Citation: Rong Shuanglong, Li Chuanri, Xu Fei, et al. Method optimization of optimum measurement point selection in experiential modal analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2014, 40(4): 536-543. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2013.0292(in Chinese)

Method optimization of optimum measurement point selection in experiential modal analysis

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2013.0292
  • Received Date: 27 May 2013
  • Publish Date: 20 Apr 2014
  • As an important basis of the validation of the finite element model, the result of experimental modal analysis is influenced by various aspects, one significant aspect is the measurement point selection. A new optimal measurement point selection method, namely effective independent-coefficient variance of modal kinetic energy (EI-CVMKE) method was proposed based on the effective independent (EI) method and the modal kinetic energy (MKE) method. Besides, a new criterion called the coefficient variance of modal kinetic energy (CVMKE) was presented. The obtained optimal measurement points using the new method were compared with those gained by EI method and MKE method. The advantage and disadvantage of those three methods were demonstrated by three evaluation criteria which are CVMKE, modal assurance criterion (MAC) and singular value decomposition ratio (SVD ratio). A computational simulation and a modal test on an aluminum alloy plate were carried out to demonstrate the feasibility of the optimal measurement point selection method. The result shows that EI-CVMKE method can not only make the truncated mode shapes as linearly as possible but also enable the measured MKE to maintain the maximum value. The new method is most feasible in the three methods.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Ewins D J.Modal testing:theory, practice, and application[M].London:Research Studies Press, 2000:118-123
    [2]
    Heylen W, Lammens S, Sas P.Modal analysis theory and testing[M].Heverlee:Universiteit Leuven, 1997:119-120
    [3]
    Friswell M I, Mottershead J E.Finite element model updating in structural dynamics[M].Netherlands:Springer, 1995:78-97
    [4]
    Penny J E T, Friswell M I, Garvey S D.Automatic choice of measurement locations for dynamic testing[J].AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2):407-414
    [5]
    Papadopoulos M, Garcia E.Sensor placement methodologies for dynamic testing[J].AIAA Journal, 1998, 36(2):256-263
    [6]
    Kammer D C.Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2005, 19(4):700-713
    [7]
    Meo M, Zumpano G.On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure[J].Engineering Structures, 2005, 27(10):1488-1497
    [8]
    Peck J, Torres I.A DMAP program for the selection of accelerometer locations in MSC/NASTRAN[C]//The 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference.Palm Springs:American Inst Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, 2004, 1:281-289
    [9]
    Hemez F M.Theoretical and experimental correlation between finite element models and modal tests in the context of large flexible space structures[D].Denver:University of Colorado, 1993
    [10]
    Larson C B, Zimmerman D C, Marek E L.A comparison of modal test planning techniques:excitation and sensor placement using the NASA 8-bay truss[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC).Bellingham, WA:Society for Experimental Mechanics Inc, 1994:205-211
    [11]
    Li D S, Fritzen C P, Li H N.Extended minmac algorithm and comparison of sensor placement methods[C]//Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series.New York:Springer, 2008:78-95
    [12]
    Li D S, Li H N, Fritzen C P.The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 305(4/5):945-955
    [13]
    Li Z N, Tang J, Li Q S.Optimal sensor locations for structural vibration measurements[J].Applied Acoustics, 2004, 65(8):807-818
    [14]
    Papadimitriou C.Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 278(4):923-947
    [15]
    Kammer D C.Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures[J].Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1991, 14(2):251-259
    [16]
    Kammer D C.Effect of model error on sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification of large space structures[J].Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 1992, 15(2):334-341
    [17]
    Kammer D C.Effect of noise on sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures[J].Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control-Transactions of ASME, 1992, 114(3):436-443
    [18]
    Li D.Sensor placement methods and evaluation criteria in structural health monitoring[D].Siegen:Universitat Siegen, 2011
    [19]
    Allemang R J, Brown D L.A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis[C]//Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference & Exhibit.Schenectad:Union Coll, 1982:110-116
    [20]
    Imamovic N.Model validation of large finite element model using test data[D].London:Imperial College, 1998
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views(1634) PDF downloads(609) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return