Volume 42 Issue 1
Jan.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Jianping, SHI Xinhong, ZHANG Jianyu, et al. Life up and down method for determining WFD average behavior of aircraft structures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(1): 147-151. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0056(in Chinese)
Citation: ZHANG Jianping, SHI Xinhong, ZHANG Jianyu, et al. Life up and down method for determining WFD average behavior of aircraft structures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(1): 147-151. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0056(in Chinese)

Life up and down method for determining WFD average behavior of aircraft structures

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0056
  • Received Date: 27 Jan 2015
  • Publish Date: 20 Jan 2016
  • The widespread fatigue damage (WFD) problem is a serious threat to the integrity and safety of aircraft structures.Evaluation of the WFD average behavior is the base for establishing a limit of validity of the engineering data that supports the structural maintenance program. A life up and down method for evaluating the WFD average behavior of aircraft structures was proposed based on the theory of strength up and down method in fatigue applied statistics. The residual strength test was conducted following the fatigue test with a specified fatigue life level (FLL) to determine whether the residual strength meet the requirement. Taking the mean value of the adjacent two FLL with contrasted results as the FLL could lead to a residual strength equal to the required one. By repeating the tests and statistical analysis of the results, the WFD average behavior could be found out. Test on multiple site damage structure with 5-details was conducted with the proposed method, and a WFD average behavior, with a requested residual strength and a specified loading condition, was provided. The proposed method based on the fatigue reliability can be used both in multiple site damage structures and multiple element damage structures, independent of the specific forms of the structures and the load conditions.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Aircraft accident report:Aloha Airlines,Flight 243,Boeing 737-200,N73711,near Maui,Hawaii,April 28,1988:NTSB/AAR-89/03[R].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,1989:1-27.
    [2]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Establishing and implementing limit of validity to preventwidespread fatigue damage:AC No.120-104[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,2011:1-10.
    [3]
    SWIFT T.Widespread fatigue damage monitoring-issues and concerns:95N19488[R].Washington,D.C.:Langley Research Center,1993:27-42.
    [4]
    PITT S,JONES R.Multiple-site and widespread fatigue damage in aging aircraft[J].Engineering Failure Analysis,1997,4(4):237-257.
    [5]
    HARRIS C E,JAMES C,NEWMAN J,et al.Analytical methodology for predicting widespread fatigue damage onset in fuselage structure[J].Journal of Aircraft,1998,35(2):307-317.
    [6]
    李嘉骞,沈海军.老龄飞机广布疲劳问题研究综述[J].飞机设计,2014,34(1):28-32. LI J Q,SHEN H J.Widespread fatigue problem of aging aircrafts[J].Aircraft Design,2014,34(1):28-32(in Chinese).
    [7]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure:AC No.25.571-1C[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,1998:2-20.
    [8]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Aging aircraft program:Widespread fatigue damage,proposed rule[J].Federal Register,2006,74(71):19927-19951.
    [9]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Aging airplane inspections and records reviews:AC No.120-84[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,2009:7-14.
    [10]
    Federal Aviation Administration.Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure:AC No.25.571-1D[S].Washington,D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,2011:5-23.
    [11]
    EASTIN R.‘WFD’-what is it and what's ‘LOV’ got to do with it [J].International Journal of Fatigue,2009,31(6):1012-1016.
    [12]
    XIE J,LU Y.Study on airworthiness requirements of composite aircraft structure for transport category aircraft in FAA[J].Procedia Engineering,2011,17:270-278.
    [13]
    王生楠,郑晓玲.运输类飞机防止广布疲劳损伤的新规章解读[J].航空学报,2010,31(9):1758-1768. WANG S N,ZHENG X L.Study on proposed rules to preclude widespread fatigue damage for transport category aircraft[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2010,31(9):1758-1768(in Chinese).
    [14]
    詹福宇,杨伟,王生楠,等.确定机队WFD 平均行为的方法研究[J].西北工业大学学报,2013,31(1):103-108. ZHAN F Y,YANG W,WANG S N,et al.A method for determining WFD average behavior of aircraft fleet[J].Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University,2013,31(1):103-108 (in Chinese).
    [15]
    DIXON W J,MOOD A M.A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,1948,43:109-126.
    [16]
    高镇同.疲劳应用统计[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1986:336-343. GAO Z T.Applied statistics in fatigue[M].Beijing:Defense Industrial Press,1986:336-343(in Chinese).
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views(979) PDF downloads(440) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return