Volume 49 Issue 9
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XING Z W,ZHANG L,LUO Q,et al. Causal analysis framework of flight service[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(9):2234-2243 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0679
Citation: XING Z W,ZHANG L,LUO Q,et al. Causal analysis framework of flight service[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(9):2234-2243 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0679

Causal analysis framework of flight service

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0679
Funds:  National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFB1601200); Sichuan Youth Science and Technology Innovation Research Team Program (2019JDTD0001)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:luoqian@caacetc.com
  • Received Date: 10 Nov 2021
  • Accepted Date: 13 Dec 2021
  • Publish Date: 11 Jan 2022
  • Flight departure delay is a key and difficult problem that the civil aviation industry is unanimously concerned about. Aiming at the problem of unclear reasons for flight delays, the BLCNS-LV-IDA causality analysis framework is proposed. In the discipline of flight ground support business, causal analysis of flight departure delays is done on both a qualitative and quantitative level from the standpoint of causal inference. Firstly, a causal network model is built with the departure delay time as the goal variable using the BLCNS local causal structure learning algorithm, which combines feature selection with greedy search for maximal ancestral graph (GSMAG). Secondly, the causal effect of each edge in each equivalent network is evaluated based on the LV-IDA algorithm according to the obtained causal network. The experimental results show that the BLCNS causality discovery method has certain advantages in dealing with large sample data sets of multiple variables. In a data set with 50 nodes, compared with the baseline algorithm, the F1 value of BLCNS increased by −0.303, 0.008, and 0.132, respectively, with sample sizes of 1000, 5000, and 10000. It presents a clear upward trend. In addition, the running time of BLCNS has been shortened by 16.29%. The causal effect between nodes clarifies the specific strength of each node's impact on flight delays. It provides guidance for the fine management of flight guarantees and reducing flight delays.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李彪, 王立文, 邢志伟. 过站航班地面保障流程效能评估[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.07.16

    LI B, WANG L W, XING Z W. Effectiveness evaluation of ground support process for transit flight[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(7): 1543-1549(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2020.07.16
    [2]
    RODRÍGUEZ-SANZ Á, COMENDADOR F G, VALDÉS R A, et al. Assessment of airport arrival congestion and delay: Prediction and reliability[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2019, 98: 255-283. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.015
    [3]
    曹卫东. 基于改进贝叶斯网络结构学习的航班延误波及分析[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2009.

    CAO W D. Flight delay propagation analysis based on improving Bayesian networks structure[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2009(in Chinese).
    [4]
    许保光, 刘倩倩, 高敏刚. 基于机场繁忙程度的航班延误波及分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 87-95.

    XU B G, LIU Q Q, GAO M G. The flight delay propagation analysis based on airport busy state[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(8): 87-95(in Chinese).
    [5]
    刘玉洁. 基于贝叶斯网络的航班延误与波及预测[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2009.

    LIU Y J. Flight delay the estimation of flight delay and propagation based on Bayesian networks[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2009(in Chinese).
    [6]
    周覃, 高强, 马农. 基于聚类分析和CHAID决策树算法的航班延误预测研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2017, 39(11): 32-40.

    ZHOU T, GAO Q, MA N. Flight delay prediction based on clustering analysis and CHAID decision tree algorithm[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2017, 39(11): 32-40(in Chinese).
    [7]
    REBOLLO J J, BALAKRISHNAN H. Characterization and prediction of air traffic delays[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2014, 44: 231-241. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.04.007
    [8]
    陈超. 基于GP-LVM和LS-SVM航班延误等级预测研究[J]. 无线互联科技, 2020, 17(6): 10-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6944.2020.06.004

    CHEN C. Study on flight delay grade prediction based on GP-LVM and LS-SVM[J]. Wireless Internet Technology, 2020, 17(6): 10-11(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6944.2020.06.004
    [9]
    KHANMOHAMMADI S, TUTUN S, KUCUK Y. A new multilevel input layer artificial neural network for predicting flight delays at JFK airport[C]//Conference on Engineering Cyber Physical Systems: Applying Theory to Practice. Berlin: Springer, 2016, 95: 237-244.
    [10]
    TRIANTAFILLOU S, TSAMARDINOS I. Score-based vs constraint-based causal learning in the presence of confounders[C]//Procecding of “Causation: Foundation to Application” Workshop, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2016: 59-67.
    [11]
    AHMED A A M, DEO R C, GHAHRAMANI A, et al. LSTM integrated with Boruta-random forest optimiser for soil moisture estimation under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 global warming scenarios[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2021, 35: 1851-1881.
    [12]
    RICHARDSON T, SPIRTES P. Ancestral graph Markov models[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 2002, 30(4): 962-1030.
    [13]
    DRTON M, EICHLER M, RICHARDSON T S. Computing maximum likelihood estimates in recursive linear models with correlated errors[J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2009, 10: 2329-2348.
    [14]
    TIAN J. Identifying direct causal effects in linear models[C]//Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Reston: AIAA, 2005: 346-353.
    [15]
    RICHARDSON T S. A factorization criterion for acyclic directed mixed graphs[EB/OL]. (2014-06-26)[2021-11-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6764.
    [16]
    NOWZOHOUR C, MAATHUIS M, BÜHLMANN P. Structure learning with bow-free acyclic path diagrams[EB/OL]. (2017-12-02)[2021-11-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.01717v2.
    [17]
    MAATHUIS M H, KALISCH M, BÜHLMANN P. Estimating high-dimensional intervention effects from observational data[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 2009, 37(6A): 3133-3164.
    [18]
    MALINSKY D, SPIRTES P. Estimating causal effects with ancestral graph Markov models[C]//Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models. Brookline: Microsoft Publishing, 2016: 299-309.
    [19]
    MAATHUIS M H, COLOMBO D. A generalized back-door criterion[J]. The Annals of Statistics, 2015, 43(3): 1060-1088.
    [20]
    TSIRLIS K, LAGANI V, TRIANTAFILLOU S, et al. On scoring maximal ancestral graphs with the max-min hill climbing algorithm[J]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2018, 102: 74-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.08.002
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(438) PDF downloads(29) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return