Volume 49 Issue 9
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHU Z H,XIAO T H,XU Y N,et al. Adjoint-based adaptive Cartesian mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(9):2432-2441 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0689
Citation: ZHU Z H,XIAO T H,XU Y N,et al. Adjoint-based adaptive Cartesian mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(9):2432-2441 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0689

Adjoint-based adaptive Cartesian mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0689
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (11672133); National Science Foundation of Shanxi Province (2021JQ-078); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (F2021110); Open Foundations of EDL Laboratory (EDL19092111)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:xthang@nuaa.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 16 Nov 2021
  • Accepted Date: 05 Jan 2022
  • Publish Date: 25 Jan 2022
  • In view of the sonic boom prediction for supersonic transport, this paper develops a numerical method for supersonic near-field based on a finite volume scheme and an adjoint-based Cartesian adaptive mesh refinement for the governing equations. By solving the adjoint equation on an embedded-boundary Cartesian mesh, it can be determined that how sensitive the chosen output functional is to the residual of the discretized Euler equations, such as the surface integral of the related pressure signatures. Then, the computed adjoint variables render a correction term to improve the accuracy of the function on the coarse mesh and direct estimation of the remaining error to form an error estimate and a localized refinement parameter, according to which the Cartesian grid cells are locally refined subsequently. As a result, local mesh refinement steadily reduces each cell’s remaining error, improving the output function’s computational correctness. The 69° delta wing-body and NASA C25D configuration with powered nacelle are employed as validation cases where the computed results are compared with the documented experimental tests. Results show that compared with feature-based mesh refinement, the present adjoint-based refinement method captures the shock and expansion waves and the near-field pressure signatures with higher accuracy at a less computational cost, indicating its effectiveness and efficiency for sonic boom prediction.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    朱自强, 兰世隆. 超声速民机和降低音爆研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(8): 2507-2528.

    ZHU Z Q, LAN S L. Study of supersonic commercial transport and reduction of sonic boom[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(8): 2507-2528(in Chinese).
    [2]
    韩忠华, 乔建领, 丁玉临, 等. 新一代环保型超声速客机气动相关关键技术与研究进展[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 620-635. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0288

    HAN Z H, QIAO J L, DING Y L, et al. Key technologies for next-generation environmentally-friendly supersonic transport aircraft: A review of recent progress[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 620-635(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0288
    [3]
    钱战森, 韩忠华. 声爆研究的现状与挑战[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 601-619. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0054

    QIAN Z S, HAN Z H. Progress and challenges of sonic boom research[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 601-619(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2019.0054
    [4]
    SMITH H. A review of supersonic business jet design Issues[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2007, 111(1126): 761-776. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000001883
    [5]
    SUN Y C, SMITH H. Review and prospect of supersonic business jet design[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2017, 90: 12-38. doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.003
    [6]
    钱战森, 刘中臣, 冷岩, 等. OS-X0试验飞行器声爆特性飞行测量与数值模拟分析[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 675-682. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0276

    QIAN Z S, LIU Z C, LENG Y, et al. Flight measurement and numerical simulation of sonic boom signature of OS-X0 experimental aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 675-682(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0276
    [7]
    王刚, 马博平, 雷知锦, 等. 典型标模音爆的数值预测与分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(1): 121458.

    WANG G, MA B P, LEI Z J, et al. Simulation and analysis for sonic boom on several benchmark cases[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(1): 121458(in Chinese).
    [8]
    冯晓强, 李占科, 宋笔锋. 超音速客机音爆问题初步研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2010, 28(6): 21-23. doi: 10.13645/j.cnki.f.d.2010.06.005

    FENG X Q, LI Z K, SONG B F. Preliminary analysis on the sonic boom of supersonic aircraft[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2010, 28(6): 21-23(in Chinese). doi: 10.13645/j.cnki.f.d.2010.06.005
    [9]
    兰世隆. 超声速民机声爆理论、预测和最小化方法概述[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2019, 37(4): 646-654. doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0294

    LAN S L. Overview of sonic boom theory, prediction and minimization methods for supersonic civil aircraft[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2019, 37(4): 646-654(in Chinese). doi: 10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0294
    [10]
    PLOTKIN K J. Review of sonic boom theory[C]//12th Aeroacoustic Conference. Reston: AIAA, 1989: 1105.
    [11]
    MAGLIERI D J, BOBBITT P J, PLOTKIN K J, et al. Sonic boom: Six decades of research[M]. Hampton: Langley Research Center, 2014.
    [12]
    PLOTKIN K J. State of the art of sonic boom modeling[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002, 111(1): 530-536. doi: 10.1121/1.1379075
    [13]
    HAERING E, MURRAY J, PURIFOY D, et al. Airborne shaped sonic boom demonstration pressure measurements with computational fluid dynamics comparisons[C]//Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2005: 9.
    [14]
    MEREDITH K, DAHLIN J, GRAHAM D, et al. Computational fluid dynamics comparison and flight test measurement of F-5E off-body pressures[C]//Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2005: 6.
    [15]
    CASTNER R. Analysis of exhaust plume effects on sonic boom for a 59-degree wing body model[C]//Proceedings of the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2011: 917.
    [16]
    KIRZ J. DLR TAU simulations for the third AIAA sonic boom prediction workshop near-field cases[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2021 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2021: 472.
    [17]
    PARK M A, CAMPBELL R L, ELMILIGUI A A, et al. Specialized CFD grid generation methods for near-field sonic boom prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2014: 115.
    [18]
    ISHIKAWA H, MAKINO Y, ITO T, et al. Sonic boom prediction using multi-block structured grids CFD code considering jet-on effects[C]//Proceedings of the 27th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2009: 3508.
    [19]
    CLIFF S E, THOMAS S D. Euler/experiment correlations of sonic boom pressure signatures[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1993, 30(5): 669-675. doi: 10.2514/3.46396
    [20]
    LYU F X, XIAO T H, YU X Q. A fast and automatic full-potential finite volume solver on Cartesian grids for unconventional configurations[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(3): 951-963. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2017.03.001
    [21]
    吕凡熹, 肖天航, 余雄庆. 基于自适应直角网格的二维全速势方程有限体积解法[J]. 计算力学学报, 2016, 33(3): 424-430.

    LYU F X, XIAO T H, YU X Q. A finite volume method for 2D Full-Potential equation on adaptive Cartesian grids[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2016, 33(3): 424-430(in Chinese).
    [22]
    吕凡熹, 李正洲, 邓经枢, 等. 面向飞行器概念设计的全速域气动分析工具[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2017, 35(5): 625-632.

    LYU F X, LI Z Z, DENG J S, et al. An aerodynamic analysis tool for aircraft conceptual design at full speed range[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2017, 35(5): 625-632(in Chinese).
    [23]
    NAYANI S. Evaluation of grid modification methods for on-and off-track sonic boom analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013: 798.
    [24]
    CLIFF S E, THOMAS S D, MCMULLEN M S, et al. Assessment of unstructured Euler methods for sonic boom pressure signatures using grid refinement and domain rotation methods: TM-2008-214568[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 2008.
    [25]
    OZCER I, KANDIL O. Fun3D/OptiGRID coupling for unstructured grid adaptation for sonic boom problems[C]//Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008: 61.
    [26]
    VENDITTI D A, DARMOFAL D L. Grid adaptation for functional outputs: Application to two-dimensional inviscid flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 176(1): 40-69. doi: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6967
    [27]
    JONES W, NIELSEN E, PARK M. Validation of 3D adjoint based error estimation and mesh adaptation for sonic boom prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2006: 1150.
    [28]
    NEMEC M, AFTOSMIS M, WINTZER M. Adjoint-based adaptive mesh refinement for complex geometries[C]//Proceedings of the 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2008: 725.
    [29]
    WINTZER M, NEMEC M, AFTOSMIS M. Adjoint-based adaptive mesh refinement for sonic boom prediction[C]//Proceedings of the 26th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2008: 6593.
    [30]
    NEMEC M, RODRIGUEZ D L, AFTOSMIS M J. Adjoint-based mesh adaptation and shape optimization for simulations with propulsion[C]//Proceedings of the AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2019: 3488.
    [31]
    XIAO T H, QIN N, LUO D M, et al. Deformable overset grid for multibody unsteady flow simulation[J]. AIAA Journal, 2016, 54(8): 2392-2406. doi: 10.2514/1.J054861
    [32]
    HUNTON L W, HICKS R M, MENDOZA J P. Some effects of wing planform on sonic boom: TN D-7160[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1973.
    [33]
    CELIK I, KARATEKIN O. Numerical experiments on application of Richardson extrapolation with nonuniform grids[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1997, 119(3): 584-590. doi: 10.1115/1.2819284
    [34]
    ORDAZ I, WINTZER M, RALLABHANDI S K. Full-carpet design of a low-boom demonstrator concept[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2015: 2261.
    [35]
    WINTZER M, ORDAZ I. Under-track CFD-based shape optimization for a low-boom demonstrator concept[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2015: 2260.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(110) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return