Volume 50 Issue 6
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG X L,YIN H,HE M. Potential conflict prediction of mobile targets in airfield areas based on LSTM[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(6):1850-1860 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0505
Citation: WANG X L,YIN H,HE M. Potential conflict prediction of mobile targets in airfield areas based on LSTM[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(6):1850-1860 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0505

Potential conflict prediction of mobile targets in airfield areas based on LSTM

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0505
Funds:  National Key R & D Program of China (2020YFB1600101); National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2133207); Natural Science Key Project of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission (2020ZD01); The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3122020052)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:xinglong1979@163.com
  • Received Date: 20 Jun 2022
  • Accepted Date: 18 Sep 2022
  • Available Online: 30 Sep 2022
  • Publish Date: 28 Sep 2022
  • In view of the problem of frequent conflicts in airfield areas, a method to predict the potential conflicts of mobile targets in airfield areas based on long short-term memory (LSTM) network was proposed. According to the complex network theory, aircraft and vehicles were taken as the research objects, and the network of mobile targets in the airfield area was established. The dynamic evolution model of the network was set, and the operation data was input to calculate multiple characteristic indicators of the network. In addition, the principal component analysis of the indicator time series was carried out to synthesize the potential conflict indicator. A LSTM network model was built by using the Keras framework, and the indicator time series were input into LSTM network for training and prediction and compared with other prediction methods. The actual operation data of Xi’an Xianyang Airport were used for experiments. The predicted values were compared with the real values. The mean square errors of the predicted results of each indicator were 1.608%, 13.126%, 0.072%, 0.004%, and 0.014%, respectively. The results show that the potential conflicts can be described from different perspectives by using characteristic indicators of the network after the network model of mobile targets in the airfield area is built. LSTM network can effectively predict the potential conflicts in the network of mobile targets in the airfield area, remind relevant personnel to prevent conflicts, and reduce the probability of conflicts.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CAI C T, WU K J, YAN Y J. Rapid detection and social media supervision of runway incursion based on deep learning[J]. International Journal of Innovative Computing and Applications, 2018, 9(2): 98-106. doi: 10.1504/IJICA.2018.092600
    [2]
    SONG I, CHO I, TESSITORE T, et al. Data-driven prediction of runway incursions with uncertainty quantification[J]. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 2018, 32(2): 04018004. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000733
    [3]
    朱新平, 汤新民, 韩松臣. A-SMGCS滑行道冲突预测与避免控制[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2011, 43(4): 504-510. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2011.04.012

    ZHU X P, TANG X M, HAN S C. Conflict prediction and avoidance control for A-SMGCS taxiway[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2011, 43(4): 504-510 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2615.2011.04.012
    [4]
    肖琴, 罗帆. 机场场面交通冲突风险演化的SD模型研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(6): 187-193.

    XIAO Q, LUO F. SD model of risk evolution for airport surface traffic conflict[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(6): 187-193(in Chinese).
    [5]
    ZHU X P, TANG X M, HAN S C. Aircraft intersection collision conflict detection and resolution under the control of A-SMGCS[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Modelling. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2012: 626-631.
    [6]
    XIA Z H, ZHENG B, WAN J, et al. Recognition algorithm and risk assessment of airport hotspots[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2019, 24(6): 769-774. doi: 10.1007/s12204-019-2110-6
    [7]
    CAI K Q, ZHANG J, DU W B, et al. Analysis of the Chinese air route network as a complex network[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2012, 21(2): 028903. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/21/2/028903
    [8]
    王兴隆, 苗尚飞. 空域扇区网络结构特性分析及韧性评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2021, 47(5): 904-911.

    WANG X L, MIAO S F. Structural characteristics analysis and resilience assessment of airspace sector network[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 47(5): 904-911 (in Chinese).
    [9]
    王岩韬, 刘毓. 基于复杂网络的航班运行风险传播分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2020, 20(1): 198-205.

    WANG Y T, LIU Y. Flight operation risk propagation based on complex network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2020, 20(1): 198-205 (in Chinese).
    [10]
    黄洋, 汤俊, 老松杨. 基于复杂网络的无人机飞行冲突解脱算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 322222.

    HUANG Y, TANG J, LAO S Y. UAV flight conflict resolution algorithm based on complex network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 322222 (in Chinese).
    [11]
    曾航, 张红梅, 任博, 等. 基于改进LSTM模型的航空安全预测方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(2): 569-576. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.02.26

    ZENG H, ZHANG H M, REN B, et al. Aviation safety prediction method research based on improved LSTM model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(2): 569-576 (in Chinese). doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.02.26
    [12]
    李昂, 聂党民, 温祥西, 等. 管制-飞行状态相依网络演化过程[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 324726.

    LI A, NIE D M, WEN X X, et al. Evolution process of control-aircraft state interdependent network[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(9): 324726 (in Chinese).
    [13]
    李忠斌. 基于深度学习的机场场面延误的预测研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2020: 49-63.

    LI Z B. Research on airport scene delay prediction based on deep learning[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020: 49-63(in Chinese).
    [14]
    李小伟. P/H机场坐标系与2000国家大地坐标系的转换[J]. 林业科技情报, 2020, 52(2): 108-109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303.2020.02.043

    LI X W. Conversion between P/H airport coordinate system and CGCS2000[J]. Forestry Science and Technology Information, 2020, 52(2): 108-109 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3303.2020.02.043
    [15]
    DING C, HE X F. Cluster structure of K-means clustering via principal component analysis[C]//Proceedings of the Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 414-418.
    [16]
    TAKASE S, SUZUKI J, NAGATA M. Input-to-output gate to improve RNN language models[C]//Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Taipei: A sian Tederation of Natural Language Processing, 2017, 2: 43-48.
    [17]
    ROMANUKE V. ARIMA model optimal selection for time series forecasting[J]. Maritime Technical Journal, 2022, 224(1): 28-40. doi: 10.2478/sjpna-2022-0003
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(141) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return