Volume 50 Issue 7
Jul.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TAN J F,XING X B,CUI Z,et al. Investigation on aerodynamics of a helicopter approaching an active control deck[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(7):2206-2217 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0615
Citation: TAN J F,XING X B,CUI Z,et al. Investigation on aerodynamics of a helicopter approaching an active control deck[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(7):2206-2217 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0615

Investigation on aerodynamics of a helicopter approaching an active control deck

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0615
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (12172165); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211259); Outstanding Young Backbone Teacher Project of Jiangsu Qinglan Project
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:Jianfengtan@njtech.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 13 Jul 2022
  • Accepted Date: 05 Sep 2022
  • Available Online: 31 Oct 2022
  • Publish Date: 09 Oct 2022
  • Passive and active flow controls were used to reduce the turbulence intensity of ship airwake, but there was a recirculation zone on the deck resulting in intensively unsteady airloads of a helicopter. Thus, a novel active control deck (ACD) which can be automatically lifted up and descended is firstly proposed to weaken the recirculation. Helicopter airloads are examined by combining a viscous vortex particle approach with the lattice Boltzmann approach (LBM) via a one-way coupling model. This establishes a flow field analysis method of the ship with ACD. The accuracy of the method is validated by comparing the present prediction with the SFS2 experiment, detached eddy simulation (DES), and large eddy simulation (LES) results. The influences of the ACD on the ship flow field and airloads of a helicopter approaching the ship are analyzed. It is demonstrated that the ACD clearly suppresses the recirculation bubble when compared to the baseline SFS2. Additionally, the reduction of the rotor thrust, rolling, and pitching moments is weakened, with the largest reductions being 21.6%, 55.1%, 74.6%.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    NEDA T, DANIELE Z, ALEX Z, et al. Experimental study of a helicopter model in shipboard operations[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2021, 115: 106774. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106774
    [2]
    OWEN I, LEE R, WALL A, et al. The NATO generic destroyer–A shared geometry for collaborative research into modelling and simulation of shipboard helicopter launch and recovery[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 228: 108428. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108428
    [3]
    李旭, 祝小平, 周洲, 等. 动基座近舰面流场数值模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 122131.

    LI X, ZHU X P, ZHOU Z, et al. Numerical simulation of flow field during landing for carrier-based aircraft near a moving base[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 122131(in Chinese).
    [4]
    CROZON C, STEIJL R, BARAKOS G N. Coupled flight dynamics and CFD–demonstration for helicopters in shipborne environment[J]. The Aeronautical Journal, 2018, 122(1247): 42-82. doi: 10.1017/aer.2017.112
    [5]
    FORREST J S, OWEN I. An investigation of ship airwakes using detached-eddy simulation[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2010, 39(4): 656-673.
    [6]
    SHAFER D, GHEE T. Active and passive flow control over the flight deck of small naval vessels[C]//Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston: AIAA, 2005: 5265.
    [7]
    FINDLA D B, GHEE T. Experimental investigation of ship airwake flow control for a US navy flight II-A class destroyer (DDG)[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2006: 1-10.
    [8]
    GREENWELL D, BARRETT R. Inclined screens for control of ship air wakes[C]// Proceedings of the 3rd AIAA Flow Control Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2006: 3502.
    [9]
    BARDERA R, MESEGUER J. Flow in the near air wake of a modified frigate[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 229(6): 1003-1012. doi: 10.1177/0954410014542449
    [10]
    FORREST J S, KAARIA C H, OWEN I. Determining the impact of hangar-edge modifications on ship-helicopter operations using offline and piloted helicopter flight simulation[C]//American Helicopter Society 66th Annual Forum. Montreal: AHS, 2010: 11-13.
    [11]
    SHI Y J, HE X, XU Y, et al. Numerical study on flow control of ship airwake and rotor airload during helicopter shipboard landing[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(2): 324-336. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2018.12.020
    [12]
    BARDERA-MORA R, CONESA A, LOZANO I. Simple frigate shape plasma flow control[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2016, 230(14): 2693-2699. doi: 10.1177/0954410016630333
    [13]
    SHI Y J, SU D C, XU G H. Numerical investigation of the influence of passive/active flow control on ship/helicopter dynamic interface[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 106: 106205. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106205
    [14]
    李光印, 徐国华, 史勇杰, 等. 主动射流控制对直升机着舰飞行的影响分析[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2021, 53(12): 68-79.

    LI G Y, XU G H, SHI Y J, et al. Influence of active flow control on shipborne helicopter landing[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2021, 53(12): 68-79(in Chinese).
    [15]
    BARDERA J, MATIAS J C. A comparison of helicopter recovery maneuvers on frigates by means of PIV measurements[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 219: 108393. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108393
    [16]
    KOELMAN J M V A. A simple lattice boltzmann scheme for navier-stokes fluid flow[J]. Europhysics Letters (EPL), 1991, 15(6): 603-607. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/15/6/007
    [17]
    RANDLES A P, KALE V, HAMMOND J, et al. Performance analysis of the lattice boltzmann model beyond navier-stokes[C]//Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2013: 1063-1074.
    [18]
    LÉVÊQUE E, TOSCHI F, SHAO L, et al. Shear-improved Smagorinsky model for large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded turbulent flows[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 570: 491-502. doi: 10.1017/S0022112006003429
    [19]
    DOOLEY G, EZEQUIEL MARTIN J, BUCHHOLZ J H J, et al. Ship airwakes in waves and motions and effects on helicopter operation[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2020, 208: 104627.
    [20]
    谭剑锋, 周天熠, 王畅, 等. 旋翼地面效应的气动建模与特性[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(6): 122602.

    TAN J F, ZHOU T Y, WANG C, et al. Aerodynamic model and characteristics of rotor in ground effect[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(6): 122602(in Chinese).
    [21]
    谭剑锋, 何龙, 于领军, 等. 基于粘性涡粒子VVPM/沙粒DEM的直升机沙盲建模研究[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 125536.

    TAN J F, HE L, YU L J, et al. Investigation on method of helicopter brownout based on viscous vortex particle and sand particle DEM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(3): 125536(in Chinese).
    [22]
    CHENEY B, ZAN S. CFD code validation data and flow topology for the technical co-operation program AER-TP2 simple frigate shape NRCIAR-LTR-A-035[R]. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada Technical Report NRCIAR-LTR-A-035, 1999.
    [23]
    QUON E W, CROSS P A, SMITH M J. Investigation of ship airwakes using a hybrid computational methodology[C]//Proceedings of the AHS 70th Annual Forum. Montreal: AHS, 2014: 3001-3014.
    [24]
    THEDIN R, KINZEL M P, SCHMITZ S. High-fidelity simulations of the interaction of atmospheric turbulence with ship airwakes[C]//Proceedings of the AHS International 73rd Annual Forum & Technology Display. Montreal: AHS, 2017: 1-14.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(18)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(323) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return