Citation: | CHENG Kai, LYU Zhenzhou, SHI Yanet al. Global sensitivity analysis under mixed uncertainty based on possibilistic moments[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(8): 1705-1712. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0626(in Chinese) |
For the structures with fuzzy uncertainty and random uncertainty simultaneously, to measure the influence of fuzzy and random input variables on the statistical characteristic of output response, a new global sensitivity index is proposed. Based on the definition of possibilistic moments of the fuzzy variable, the characteristic of the output response under mixed uncertainty is analyzed. With respect to the possibilistic moments of the output response, the possibilistic expectation of output response is taken as an example, and the average difference between the unconditional probability density function (PDF) and the conditional PDF of the model output possibilistic expectation is used to establish the global sensitivity indices for both the fuzzy input and the random input. The properties of the proposed global sensitivity indices are discussed, and the Kriging surrogate model is applied to solving the proposed index efficiently. Finally, some examples are used to verify the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed method.
[1] |
BORGONOVO E.Measuring uncertainty importance:Investigation and comparison of alternative approaches[J].Risk Analysis, 2006, 26(5):1349-1361. doi: 10.1111/risk.2006.26.issue-5
|
[2] |
HAMBY D M.A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 1994, 32(2):135-154. doi: 10.1007/BF00547132
|
[3] |
SALTELLI A, MARIVOET J.Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output:A comparison of selected techniques[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990, 28(2):229-253. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095183209090065U
|
[4] |
STORLIE C B, SWILER L P, HELTON J C, et al.Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(11):1735-1763. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832009001112
|
[5] |
SOBOL I M.Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models[J].Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiment, 1993, 1(4):407-414. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/sensitivity-estimates-nonlinear-mathematical-models/
|
[6] |
SOBOL I M.Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates[J].Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1):271-280. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378475400002706
|
[7] |
BORGONOVO E.A new uncertainty importance measure[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(6):771-784. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832006000883
|
[8] |
LIU Q, HOMMA T.A new computational method of a moment-independent uncertainty importance measure[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2009, 94(7):1205-1211. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832008002573
|
[9] |
SONG S F, LU Z Z, CUI L J.A generalized Borgonovo's importance measure for fuzzy input uncertainty[J].Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2012, 189(1):53-62. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011411002727
|
[10] |
LI L Y, LU Z Z, LI W.Importance measure system of fuzzy and random input variables and its solution by point estimates[J].Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(8):2167-2179. doi: 10.1007/s11431-011-4402-4
|
[11] |
GREEGAR G, MANOHAR C.Global response sensitivity analysis of uncertain structures[J].Structural Safety, 2016, 58(10):94-104. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473015000806
|
[12] |
LI L Y, LU Z Z.Importance analysis for model with mixed uncertainties[J].Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2017, 310(6):90-107. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011415006119
|
[13] |
陈超, 吕震宙.模糊分布参数的全局灵敏度分析新方法[J].工程力学, 2016, 2(3):25-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201602005.htm
CHEN C, LV Z Z.A new method for global sensitivity analysis of fuzzy distribution parameters[J].Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 2(3):25-33(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GCLX201602005.htm
|
[14] |
CHRISTER C, ROBERT F.On possibilistic mean value and variance of fuzzy numbers[J].Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2012, 122(2):315-326.
|
[15] |
SAEIDIFAR A, PASHA E.The possibilistic moments of fuzzy numbers and their applications[J].Journal of Computational & Applied Mathematics, 2009, 223(2):1028-1042. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037704270800143X
|
[16] |
KAYMAZ I.Application of Kriging method to structural reliability problems[J].Structural Safety, 2005, 27(2):133-151. doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001
|
[17] |
OLSSON A, SANDBERG G, DAHLBLOM O.On Latin hypercube sampling for structural reliability analysis[J].Structural Safety, 2003, 25(2):47-68. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167473002000395
|
[18] |
LV Z Y, LU Z Z, WANG P.A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering[J].Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2015, 70(5):1182-1197. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122115003399
|
[19] |
PIERRIC K, BRUNO S, NADÈGE V, et al.A new surrogate modeling technique combining Kriging and polynomial chaos expansions -Application to uncertainty analysis in computational dosimetry[J].Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 286(10):103-117. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999115000388
|
[20] |
KOEHLER J R, OWEN A B.9 computer experiments[J].Handbook of Statistics, 1996, 13(2):261-308. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016971619613011X
|
[21] |
ZHANG L G, LU Z Z, WANG P.Efficient structural reliability analysis method based on advanced Kriging model[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(2):781-793. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.07.008
|
[22] |
ROBERT H S, MARK A C.System reliability and sensitivityfactors via the MPPSS method[J].Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 20(2):148-157. doi: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.02.001
|