Volume 49 Issue 4
Apr.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SU D C,WANG Z Z,WU L H,et al. Flight characteristics of coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter during deck landing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(4):832-841 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0358
Citation: SU D C,WANG Z Z,WU L H,et al. Flight characteristics of coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter during deck landing[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2023,49(4):832-841 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0358

Flight characteristics of coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter during deck landing

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0358
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:1462177095@qq.com
  • Received Date: 29 Jun 2021
  • Accepted Date: 18 Oct 2021
  • Available Online: 02 Jun 2023
  • Publish Date: 15 Nov 2021
  • A coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter flight dynamics model, which can be coupled with unsteady ship airwake, was developed to investigate flight characteristics of the rotorcraft during deck landing. In the numerical simulation of ship flowfield, the detached eddy simulation method was used to obtain high-precision data of the flowfield. In building the flight dynamic model, an interaction factor of coaxial twin rotor was introduced to develop the induced velocity model of the coaxial rigid rotor, and the concept of equivalent flapping was adopted to establish the flapping movement function of coaxial rigid rotor. Then, a strategy which can transmit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) data to the flight dynamics model was established based on the “one-way” coupling idea. The accuracies of the flight dynamics model and the data transfer strategy were verified by analyzing the XH-59A coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter and the combination of UH-60A/SFS2, respectively. Next, the combination of SFS2 ship model and XH-59A coaxial-rigid-rotor helicopter was chosen to investigate the influences of the ship airwake on the helicopter in terms of control margins and unsteady loading level. The time-averaged results showed that due to the differences in disturbance between the upper and lower rotor, pilots had to reduce the differential collective pitch to maintain the direction of the helicopter nose, while increasing the collective pitch to maintain the altitude at the same time. Furthermore, the unsteady level results indicated that for coaxial configuration, the disturbances in its thrust and pitch moment are the primary causes of pilot workload.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    KÄÄRIÄ C H, WANG Y, PADFIELD G D, et al. Aerodynamic loading characteristics of a model-scale helicopter in a ship’s airwake[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(5): 1271-1278. doi: 10.2514/1.C031535
    [2]
    YUE M, WEI W, HAO H, et al. A visual/inertial integrated landing guidance method for UAV landing on the ship[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 85: 474-480. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.12.030
    [3]
    JI H L, CHEN R L, LI P. Real-time simulation model for helicopter flight task analysis in turbulent atmospheric environment[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 92: 289-299. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.066
    [4]
    FORREST J S, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Ship-helicopter operating limits prediction using piloted flight simulation and time-accurate airwakes[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2012, 49(4): 1020-1031. doi: 10.2514/1.C031525
    [5]
    ALPMAN E, LONG L N, BRIDGES D O, et al. Fully-coupled simulations of the rotorcraft/ship dynamic interface[J]. Annual Forum Proceedings-American Helicopter Society, 2007, 63(2): 1367.
    [6]
    HODGE S J, ZAN S J, ROPER D M. Time-accurate ship airwake and unsteady aerodynamic loads modeling for maritime helicopter simulation[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2009, 54(2): 022005. doi: 10.4050/JAHS.54.022005
    [7]
    BOGSTAD M C, HABASHI W G, AKEL I. Computational-fluid-dynamics based advanced ship-airwake database for helicopter flight simulators[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2002, 39(5): 830-838. doi: 10.2514/2.3003
    [8]
    ROPER D M, OWEN I, PADFIELD G D, et al. Integrating CFD and piloted simulation to quantify ship-helicopter operating limits[J]. Aeronautical Journal, 2006, 110(1109): 419-428. doi: 10.1017/S0001924000001329
    [9]
    LEE D, HORN J F , LONG L N , et al. Simulation of helicopter shipboard launch and recovery with time-accurate airwakes[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2005, 42(2): 448-461.
    [10]
    杨俊. 共轴式直升机舰面起降风限图计算[J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2017, 32(1): 149-153. doi: 10.7682/j.issn.1673-1522.2017.01.009

    YANG J. Calculation of save operation envelope of a coaxial helicopter on shipboard[J]. Journal of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, 2017, 32(1): 149-153(in Chinese). doi: 10.7682/j.issn.1673-1522.2017.01.009
    [11]
    PHELPS A E, MINECK R E. Aerodynamic characteristics of a counter-rotating, coaxial, hingeless rotor helicopter model with auxiliary propulsion: NASA-TM-78705[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1978.
    [12]
    FELKER F F. Performance and loads data from a wind tunnel test of a full-scale, coaxial, hingeless rotor helicopter: NASA-TM-81329[R]. Washirgton, D.C.: NASA, 1981.
    [13]
    LIESHMAN J G, ANANTHAN S. An optimum coaxial rotor system for axial flight[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2008, 53(4): 367-381.
    [14]
    BURGESS R K. The ABCTM rotor: A historical perspective[C]// The American Helicopter Society 60th Annual Forum. Virginia: American Helicopter Society, 2004: 2306-2352.
    [15]
    WALSH D, WEINER S, ARIFIAN K. High airspeed testing of the sikorsky X-2 technologyTM demonstrator[C]// The 67th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society International. Virginia: American Helicopter Society, 2011: 2999-3010.
    [16]
    袁野, 陈仁良, 李攀. 共轴刚性旋翼旋翼飞行器配平特性及验证[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 48(2): 186-193.

    YUAN Y, CHEN R L, LI P. Trim characteristics and verification of coaxial rigid rotor aircraft[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2016, 48(2): 186-193(in Chinese).
    [17]
    袁野, 陈仁良, 李攀, 等. 共轴刚性旋翼直升机旋翼控制相位角问题分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(10): 2047-2053. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0812

    YUAN Y, CHEN R L, LI P, et a1. Rotor control phase angle analysis for coaxial rigid rotor helicopter[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(10): 2047-2053(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0812
    [18]
    KÄÄRIÄ C H, FORREST J S, OWEN I , et al. Simulated aerodynamic loading of an SH-60B helicopter in a ship’s airwake[C]// 35th European Rotorcraft Forum. Hamburg: German Aerospace Society, 2009: 101296.
    [19]
    ZHANG F, XU H, BALL N G. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow over SFS2 ship model[C]// 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2009: 090081.
    [20]
    LEE R G, ZAN S J. Unsteady aerodynamic loading on a helicopter fuselage in a ship airwake[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2004, 49(2): 149-159. doi: 10.4050/JAHS.49.149
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(13)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(314) PDF downloads(44) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return