Volume 50 Issue 1
Jan.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Y,ZHAO X Y,YANG S H,et al. Quality control model of CYGNSS sea surface wind speed retrieval based on ML combination[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(1):20-29 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0220
Citation: ZHANG Y,ZHAO X Y,YANG S H,et al. Quality control model of CYGNSS sea surface wind speed retrieval based on ML combination[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(1):20-29 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0220

Quality control model of CYGNSS sea surface wind speed retrieval based on ML combination

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0220
Funds:  National Natural Science Foundation of China (41871325,42176175); National Key R & D Program of China (2019YFD0900805)
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:shyang@shou.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 06 Apr 2022
  • Accepted Date: 11 Jun 2022
  • Available Online: 27 Jul 2022
  • Publish Date: 27 Jul 2022
  • Convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used for sea surface wind speed retrieval of cyclone global navigation satellite system (CYGNSS). There are still anomalous values in the observation data of CYGNSS, despite the fact that numerous quality control indicators have been set up to detect and weaken the abnormal observation data of CYGNSS before model training, which results in a drop in model retrieval accuracy and even incorrect retrieval results. Therefore, this paper proposes a wind speed retrieval model based on machine learning (ML) combination. Based on the CYGNSS retrieval of sea surface wind speed based on the CNN regression model, the ML classification model generates the quality flag of the CNN regression result, which can detect and remove the outliers of the CNN regression results to further improve the data quality of the wind speed retrieval results, and the ML classification model can better consider the interaction between various data errors, instead of using the threshold for each condition individually, to achieve better results. The effect of retrieval accuracy of sea surface wind speed. Six classification models were compared in the experiments, including Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), naive Bayes model, K-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithm, neural network (NN) model, and support vector machine (SVM). It was ultimately determined that the classification model based on KNN algorithm had the best impact on the quality control of wind speed retrieval. The wind speed retrieval combined model significantly improves the accuracy of the retrieval results. In the range of 0−20 m/s, the filtering rate of abnormal samples is 81.27%, and in all filtered data, the filtering correct rate is 86.03%; the root mean square error of the error is reduced from 1.7 m/s for the classification model without ML to 1.44 m/s for the classification model with ML. Among them, the training sample is 0−10 m/s retrieval results, and the accuracy improvement effect is more obvious, which proves the effectiveness of the ML combination model proposed in this paper for wind speed quality control.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    MASHBURN J, AXELRAD P, ZUFFADA C, et al. Improved GNSS-R ocean surface altimetry with CYGNSS in the seas of Indonesia[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(9): 6071-6087. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2020.2973079
    [2]
    HUANG F X, GARRISON J L, RODRIGUEZ-ALVAREZ N, et al. Sequential processing of GNSS-R delay-Doppler maps to estimate the ocean surface wind field[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(12): 10202-10217. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2931847
    [3]
    ZHU Y C, TAO T Y, YU K G, et al. Sensing sea ice based on Doppler spread analysis of spaceborne GNSS-R data[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2020, 13: 217-226. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2955175
    [4]
    YIN C, LOPEZ-BAEZA E, MARTIN-NEIRA M, et al. Intercomparison of soil moisture retrieved from GNSS-R and from passive L-band radiometry at the Valencia anchor station[J]. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 19(8): 1900. doi: 10.3390/s19081900
    [5]
    CLARIZIA M P, RUF C S, JALES P, et al. Spaceborne GNSS-R minimum variance wind speed estimator[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(11): 6829-6843. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2303831
    [6]
    VALENCIA E, ZAVOROTNY V U, AKOS D M, et al. Using DDM asymmetry metrics for wind direction retrieval from GPS ocean-scattered signals in airborne experiments[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2014, 52(7): 3924-3936. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2278151
    [7]
    GLEASON S, RUF C, CLARIZIA M P, et al. Calibration and unwrapping of the normalized scattering cross section for the cyclone global navigation satellite system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2016, 54(5): 2495-2509. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2015.2502245
    [8]
    骆黎明, 白伟华, 孙越强. 基于树模型机器学习方法的GNSS-R海面风速反演[J]. 空间科学学报, 2020, 40(4): 595-601.

    LUO L M, BAI W H, SUN Y Q. GNSS-R sea surface wind speed retrieval based on tree model machine learning method[J]. Journal of Space Science, 2020, 40(4): 595-601(in Chinese).
    [9]
    CARDELLACH E, NAN Y, LI W. Variational retrievals of high winds using uncalibrated CyGNSS observables[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(23): 3930. doi: 10.3390/rs12233930
    [10]
    SAÏD F, JELENAK Z, PARK J, et al. The NOAA track-wise wind retrieval algorithm and product assessment for CyGNSS[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2021, 60: 1-24.
    [11]
    GLEASON S. Level 1B DDM calibration : 148-0137[R]. Washington, D. C. : NASA, 2020.
    [12]
    LI X, MECIKALSKI J R, LANG T J. A study on assimilation of CYGNSS wind speed data for tropical convection during 2018 January MJO[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(8): 1243. doi: 10.3390/rs12081243
    [13]
    ZHANG Y, YIN J, YANG S, et al. High wind speed retrieval model of CYGNSS sea surface data based on machine learning[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(16): 3324. doi: 10.3390/rs13163324
    [14]
    RUF C, CHANG P, CLARIZIA M P, et al. CYGNSS handbook[M]. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, 2016.
    [15]
    HERSBACH H, BELL B, BERRISFORD P, et al. ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present[EB/OL]. (2018-10-23)[2022-04-01]. https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-single-levels?tab=form.
    [16]
    ROSKA T, CHUA L O. The CNN universal machine: An analogic array computer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 2015, 40(3): 163-173.
    [17]
    徐嘉兴, 李钢, 陈国良. 基于logistic回归模型的矿区土地利用演变驱动力分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(20): 247-255.

    XU J X, LI G, CHEN G L. Analysis of driving force of land use evolution in mining area based on logistic regression model[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 28(20): 247-255(in Chinese).
    [18]
    张增伟, 吴萍. 基于朴素贝叶斯算法的改进遗传算法分类研究[J]. 计算机工程与设计, 2012, 33(2): 750-753.

    ZHANG Z W, WU P. Research on classification of improved genetic algorithm based on naive Bayes algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2012, 33(2): 750-753(in Chinese).
    [19]
    ALIMJAN G, SUN T L, LIANG Y, et al. A new technique for remote sensing image classification based on combinatorial algorithm of SVM and KNN[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 32(7): 1859012. doi: 10.1142/S0218001418590127
    [20]
    BOLLWEIN F, WESTPHAL S. A branch & bound algorithm to determine optimal bivariate splits for oblique decision tree induction[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2021, 51: 7552-7572.
    [21]
    ALIMJAN G, SUN T L, JUMAHUN H, et al. A hybrid classification approach based on support vector machine and K-nearest neighbor for remote sensing data[J]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 31(10): 1750034. doi: 10.1142/S0218001417500343
    [22]
    BALASUBRAMANIAM R, RUF C. Neural network based quality control of CYGNSS wind retrieval[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(17): 2859. doi: 10.3390/rs12172859
    [23]
    SUN X K, LIU L, LI C F, et al. Classification for remote sensing data with improved CNN-SVM method[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 164507-164516. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2952946
    [24]
    RUF C, GLEASON S, MCKAGUE D. Assessment of CYGNSS wind speed retrieval uncertainty[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2019, 12(1): 87-97.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(479) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return