菱形翼布局太阳能无人机螺旋桨滑流影响研究

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0438

北京航空航天大学学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 1296-1306.doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0438

菱形翼布局太阳能无人机螺旋桨滑流影响研究

赵炜¹, 黄江流², 周洲³, 张顺家¹, 毕鹏¹

1. 上海机电工程研究所, 上海 201109;
2. 上海航天动力技术研究所, 上海 201109;
3. 西北工业大学航空学院, 西安 710072

收稿日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2020-07-18
通讯作者: 赵炜 E-mail:zhaowei_0203@163.com
作者简介:赵炜男,硕士研究生,工程师。主要研究方向:飞行器总体设计与气动特性研究。

Effects of propeller slipstream on diamond joined-wing configuration solar-powered UAV

ZHAO Wei¹, HUANG Jiangliu², ZHOU Zhou³, ZHANG Shunjia¹, BI Peng¹

1. Shanghai Electro-Mechanical Engineering Institute, Shanghai 201109, China;
2. Shanghai Space Propulsion Technology Institute, Shanghai 201109, China;
3. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

Received:2019-08-12 Published:2020-07-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究螺旋桨滑流对低雷诺数菱形翼布局太阳能无人机气动特性的影响，采用动量源方法（MSM）与k-k_L-ω转捩模型求解雷诺平均Navier-Stokes （RANS）方程对不同转速状态下菱形翼布局太阳能无人机的气动特性进行了准确模拟。并通过对比机翼表面流场结构与压力分布，分析了不同迎角下螺旋桨转速变化对菱形翼布局前后翼气动干扰的机理。研究表明：随着螺旋桨转速增大，小迎角下增升减阻效果明显，最大升阻比在3 000 r/min时提升了18.4%。在小迎角时，前翼气流受到抽吸作用，升力增加，后翼受螺旋桨旋转气流影响，前缘出现大范围吸力区，压差阻力减小。在大迎角时，前翼影响不变，后翼前缘下表面吸力区范围及强度均减弱，前缘负升力区消失，增升效果改善，压差阻力增加。由于在不同迎角时，升力增量的主要贡献部件不同，导致无人机纵向静稳定裕度随着转速的提升而增大。菱形翼布局太阳能无人机通过合理设置螺旋桨位置与转速，可有效利用螺旋桨滑流提升气动性能。

关键词: 菱形翼布局, 太阳能无人机, 螺旋桨滑流, 低雷诺数, 动量源方法(MSM)

Abstract: In order to investigate the influence of propeller slipstream on the aerodynamic characteristics of low Reynolds number diamond joined-wing configuration solar-powered UAV with different rotational speeds. It was simulated accurately by solving the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation based on Momentum Source Method (MSM) and k-k_L-ω transition model. The mechanism of the propeller slipstream effects at different angles of attack and rotational speeds was analyzed by comparing the flow field structure and pressure distribution on the wing surface. The research shows that with the increase of the propeller rotational speed at low angle of attack, the propeller slipstream leads to the obvious increment of lift and decrement of drag. And the maximum lift-to-drag ratio is increased by 18.4% at 3 000 r/min. At low angle of attack, the air flow is accelerated by propeller, and it leads to increment of lift for the Frt-wing. And for the Aft-wing, the rotation of the air flow leads to decrement of pressure drag because of the emergence of low-pressure region at lower surface of leading edge. At high angle of attack, the effects of propeller to the Frt-wing are not changed. However for Aft-wing, the range and strength of low-pressure region at lower surface of leading edge decrease, which leads to the disappearance of negative lift area at leading edge as well as the notable increase of the lift and the pressure drag. Besides, since the main contribution components of lift increment are different at different angles of attack, the longitudinal static stability margin of UAV shows an enhancement with the increase of propeller rotational speed. The diamond joined-wing configuration solar-powered UAV can effectively utilize the slipstream of propeller to improve the aerodynamic performance by reasonably setting the position and speed of propeller.

Key words: diamond joined-wing configuration, solar-powered UAV, propeller slipstream, low Reynolds number, Momentum Source Method (MSM)

中图分类号:

V211

赵炜, 黄江流, 周洲, 张顺家, 毕鹏. 菱形翼布局太阳能无人机螺旋桨滑流影响研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(7): 1296-1306.

ZHAO Wei, HUANG Jiangliu, ZHOU Zhou, ZHANG Shunjia, BI Peng. Effects of propeller slipstream on diamond joined-wing configuration solar-powered UAV[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(7): 1296-1306.

参考文献

[1] 昌敏,周洲,郑志成.太阳能飞机原理及总体参数敏度分析[J].西北工业大学学报,2010,28(5):792-796.CHANG M,ZHOU Z,ZHENG Z C.Flight principles of solar-powered airplane and sensitivity of its conceptual parameters[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University,2010,28(5):792-796(in Chinese).
[2] 邓海强,余雄庆.太阳能飞机的现状和发展趋势[J].航空科学技术, 2006(1):28-30.DENG H Q,YU X Q.Solar aircraft:Status and directions[J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology,2006(1):28-30(in Chinese).
[3] 刘强,刘强,白鹏,等.不同雷诺数下翼型气动特性及层流分离现象演化[J].航空学报,2017,38(4):22-34.LIU Q,LIU Q,BAI P,et al.Aerodynamic characteristics of airfoil and evolution of laminar separation at different Reynolds numbers[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2017,38(4):22-34(in Chinese).
[4] 甘文彪,周洲,许晓平.仿生全翼式太阳能无人机气动数值模拟[J]. 航空学报,2015,36(10):3284-3294.GAN W B,ZHOU Z,XU X P.Aerodynamic numerical simulation of bionic full-wing typical solar-powered unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2015,36(10):3284-3294(in Chinese).
[5] NOLL T E,BROWN J M,PEREZ-DAVIS M E,et al.Investigation of the Helios prototype aircraft mishap.Volume I.Mishap report[R].Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2004.
[6] 王伟,周洲,祝小平,等.考虑几何非线性效应的大柔性太阳能无人机静气动弹性分析[J].西北工业大学学报,2014,32(4):499-504.WANG W,ZHOU Z,ZHU X P,et al.Static aeroelastic characteristics analysis of a very flexible solar powered UAV with geometrical effect considered[J].Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University,2014,32(4):499-504(in Chinese).
[7] DILLSAVER M J,CESNIK C E S,KOLMANOVSKY I V.Gust response sensitivity characteristics of very flexible aircraft[C]//AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference.Reston:AIAA,2012:1-20.
[8] CHARLE T,GREGORY S.Comparsion of computation and experimental studies for a joined wing aircraft:AIAA-2002-0702[R].Reston:AIAA,2002.
[9] LEDOUX S,VASSBERG J,FATTA G,et al.Aerodynamic cruise design of a joined wing sensorcraft:AIAA-2008-7190[R].Reston:AIAA,2008.
[10] 李光里,李国文,黎军,等.连接翼布局气动特性研究[J].空气动力学学报,2006,24(4):513-519.LI G L,LI G W,LI J,et al.The aerodynamic investigation of the joined-wing configuration[J].Acta Aerodynamica Sinica,2006,24(4):513-519(in Chinese).
[11] 吴光辉,王妙香,张健.盒式布局飞机的纵向气动参数优化研究[J].飞行力学,2007,25(4):5-7.WU G H,WANG M X,ZHANG J.Research on longitudinal aerodynamic parameter optimize of a joined-wing configuration aircraft[J].Flight Dynamics,2007,25(4):5-7(in Chinese).
[12] CATALANO F M.On the effects of an installed propeller slipstream on wing aerodynamic characteristics[J].Acta Polytechnica,2004,44(3):8-14.
[13] 王科雷,祝小平,周洲,等.低雷诺数分布式螺旋桨滑流气动影响[J]. 航空学报,2016,37(9):2669-2678.WANG K L,ZHU X P,ZHOU Z,et al. A study of distributed electric propulsion slipstream aerodynamic effects at low Reynolds number[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2016,37(9):2669-2678(in Chinese).
[14] 王红波,祝小平,周洲,等.基于非定常面元/黏性涡粒子法的低雷诺数滑流气动干扰[J].航空学报,2017,38(4):120412.WANG H B,ZHU X P,ZHOU Z,et al.Aerodynamic interactions at low Reynolds number slipstream with unsteady panel/viscous vortex particle method[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2017,38(4):120412(in Chinese).
[15] RAJAGOPALAN R G,LIM C K.Laminar flow analysis of a rotor in hover[J].Journal of the American Helicopter Society,1991,36(1):12-23.
[16] ZORI L A J,RAJAGOPALAN R G. Navier-Stokes calculations of rotor-airframe interaction in forward flight[J].Journal of the American Helicopter Society,1995,40(2):57-67.
[17] O'BRIEN M,SMITH M J.Analysis of rotor-fuselage interactions using various rotor models:AIAA-2005-468[R].Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[18] 宋长红,林永峰,陈文轩,等.基于动量源方法的涵道尾桨CFD分析[J].直升机技术,2009(1):6-11.SONG C H,LIN Y F,CHEN W X,et al.CFD analysis for the ducted tail rotor based on momentum-source method[J].Helicopter Technique,2009(1):6-11(in Chinese).
[19] WALTERS D K,COKLJAT D.A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of transitional flow[J].Journal of Fluids Engineering,2008,130(12):320-327.
[20] LYON C A,BROEREN A P,GIGUERE P,et al.Summary of low-speed airfoil data-Vol.3[M].Virginia Beach:Soartech Publications,1997:279-286.

菱形翼布局太阳能无人机螺旋桨滑流影响研究

Effects of propeller slipstream on diamond joined-wing configuration solar-powered UAV

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王少奇, 马东立, 杨穆清, 张良. 高空太阳能无人机三维航迹优化[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(5): 936-943.
[2]	鲍锋, 刘锦生, 朱睿, 江建华, 王俊伟. 基于涡系相交不稳定性的飞机尾流控制方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(8): 1381-1387.
[3]	杨琳, 冯涛, 邹正平, 李维. 低雷诺数涡轮内部流场分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2005, 31(11): 1194-1197.
[4]	叶建, 邹正平, 陆利蓬, 杨琳. 低雷诺数下翼型前缘流动分离机制的研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2004, 30(08): 693-697.