-
摘要:
先进接收机自主完好性监测(ARAIM)技术可用于多星座组合定位时的完好性监测,ARAIM技术子组推荐的多假设分离解(MHSS)标准算法,存在子集数量过多带来大量计算负载的问题。针对此问题,在双星座组合定位情景下,通过分析子集之间的包含关系及空间位置精度因子(PDOP)的变化,提出了使用一个子集代替多个子集减少子集数量的方法。所提方法可以明显地减少子集数量,不同参数下的仿真结果表明,优化后的算法效率至少提高2倍以上,并且优化前后的ARAIM可用性变化最大不超过3%。
-
关键词:
- 先进接收机自主完好性监测(ARAIM) /
- 多假设分离解(MHSS) /
- 双星座 /
- 子集 /
- 空间位置精度因子(PDOP)
Abstract:Advanced Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (ARAIM) technology can be used for integrity monitoring in multi-constellation combination positioning. The Multi-Hypothesis Separation Solution (MHSS) standard algorithm, recommended by the ARAIM technology subgroup, may produce lots of subsets to bring heavy computational load. Aimed at this problem, in the dual-constellation combined positioning scenario, by analyzing the inclusion relationship between subsets and the change of Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP), a method of reducing the number of subsets by using one subset to replace multiple subsets is proposed. This method can significantly reduce the number of subsets. The simulation results under different parameters show that the efficiency of the optimized algorithm is at least tripled, and the maximum ARAIM availability difference before and after optimization is no more than 3%.
-
LPV-200服务告警值 数值 水平保护级告警值/m 40 垂直保护级告警值/m 35 垂向有效监测阈值/m 15 完好性风险限值 2×10-7(进近) 表 2 标准算法在相关参数下产生的子集数量
Table 2. Number of subsets produced by standard algorithm with related parameters
各星座可见星数 子集数 Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-3,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-4Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-4,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-4Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-5,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-46/6 106 106 106 6/8 697 137 137 6/10 988 172 172 8/6 137 137 137 8/8 988 172 172 8/10 1 351 211 211 10/6 172 172 172 10/8 1 351 211 211 10/10 1 794 254 254 表 3 优化后算法产生的子集数量
Table 3. Number of subsets produced by optimized algorithm
各星座可见星数 子集数 Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-3,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-4Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-4,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-4Psat, 1=10-4, Psat, 2=10-5,
Pconst, 1=10-4, Pconst, 2=10-46/6 26 26 26 6/8 30 30 30 6/10 34 34 34 8/6 30 30 30 8/8 34 34 34 8/10 38 38 38 10/6 34 34 34 10/8 38 38 38 10/10 42 42 42 表 4 相关参数设定
Table 4. Related parameter setting
组别 Nsat Psat Pconst bnom σURA σURE 1 27 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 23 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 2 24 10-5 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 24 10-3 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 3 23 10-5 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 23 10-4 10-4 0.5 2 1.32 4 27 10-5 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 24 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 5 24 10-5 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 24 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 6 24 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 24 10-4 10-4 0.5 1 0.66 表 5 优化前后子集数量范围及仿真用时对比
Table 5. Comparison of subset number range and simulation time before and after optimization
组别 子集数量 仿真用时/min 用时比 优化前 优化后 优化前 优化后 1 92~352 26~52 82 24 3.4 2 92~2 325 26~49 603 34 17.7 3 79~301 24~48 78 21 3.7 4 106~352 28~53 87 23 3.8 5 92~301 26~49 80 22 3.6 6 92~301 26~49 77 20 3.9 表 6 优化前后的算法可用性比较
组别 算法可用性/% 优化前 优化后 1 63.4 60.5 2 96.9 96.6 3 8.18 8.49 4 100 100 5 97.7 98.2 6 97.5 97.5 -
[1] GEAS Panel.GNSS evolutionary architecture study: Phase Ⅰ-Panel report[R].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2008: 36-39. [2] GEAS Panel.Phase Ⅱ of the GNSS evolutionary architecture study[S].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2010: 27-99. [3] Working Group C, EU-U.S.ARAIM technical subgroup interim report[R].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2012: 22-34. [4] Working Group C, EU-U.S.ARAIM technical subgroup milestone 2 report[R].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2015: 69-73. [5] Working Group C, EU-U.S.ARAIM technical subgroup milestone 3 report[R].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2016: 73-97. [6] WALTER T, BLANCH J, ENGE P.Reduced subset analysis for multi-constellation ARAIM[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation.Manassas: The Institute of Navigation, 2014: 89-98. [7] GE Y S, WANG Z P, ZHU Y B.Reduced ARAIM monitoring subset method based on satellites in different orbital planes[J].GPS Solutions, 2017, 21:1443-1456. doi: 10.1007/s10291-017-0658-x [8] 葛奕杉.多星座H-ARAIM的可用性预测优化算法研究[D].北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2017: 11-32.GE Y S.Research on optimization availability predicting algorithm of H-ARAIM based on multi-constellation[D].Beijing: Beihang University, 2017: 11-32(in Chinese). [9] BLANCH J, WALTER T, ENGE P.Fixed subset selection to reduce advanced RAIM complexity[C]//Proceedings of the 2018 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation.Manassas: The Institute of Navigation, 2018: 88-98. [10] BLANCH J, WALTER T, ENGE P, et al.A proposal for multi-constellation advanced RAIM for vertical guidance[C]//Proceedings of the 24th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation.Manassas: The Institute of Navigation, 2011: 2665-2680. [11] Working Group C, EU-U.S.ARAIM concept of operation[R].Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2017: 1-7. [12] ICAO.Aeronautical telecommunications[M].Montreal:International Civil Aviation Organization, 2018:3-72. [13] BLANCH J, WALTER T, ENGE P.Exclusion for advanced RAIM: Requirements and a baseline algorithm[C]//Proceedings of the 2014 International Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation.Manassas: The Institute of Navigation, 2014: 99-107. [14] 丛丽, 谈展中.提高卫星导航定位精度和实时性的选星算法[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2008, 30(10):1914-1917. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.10.024CONG L, TAN Z Z.Satellite selection algorithm to improve precision and real-time performance of GPS positioning[J].Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, 30(10):1914-1917(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.10.024 [15] Global Positioning Systems Directorate.Navstar GPS space/navigation user interfaces: IS-GPS-200K[EB/OL].(2019-05-06)[2019-09-20].https: //www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200K.pdf.