留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

具有变点的不确定竞争失效退化系统的可靠性建模

刘宝亮 张志强 温艳清 康淑瑰 张磊

刘宝亮, 张志强, 温艳清, 等 . 具有变点的不确定竞争失效退化系统的可靠性建模[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(11): 2039-2044. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0139
引用本文: 刘宝亮, 张志强, 温艳清, 等 . 具有变点的不确定竞争失效退化系统的可靠性建模[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(11): 2039-2044. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0139
LIU Baoliang, ZHANG Zhiqiang, WEN Yanqing, et al. Reliability modeling of uncertain competing failure degradation system with a change point[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(11): 2039-2044. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0139(in Chinese)
Citation: LIU Baoliang, ZHANG Zhiqiang, WEN Yanqing, et al. Reliability modeling of uncertain competing failure degradation system with a change point[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(11): 2039-2044. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0139(in Chinese)

具有变点的不确定竞争失效退化系统的可靠性建模

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0139
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 71601101

山西省高等学校科技创新项目 2019L0738

山西省高等学校科技创新项目 2020L0463

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘宝亮  男, 博士, 副教授。主要研究方向:可靠性理论及其应用

    温艳清  女, 博士, 副教授。主要研究方向:可靠性理论及其应用

    通讯作者:

    温艳清, E-mail: oryqwen@163.com

  • 中图分类号: O213;O211.62

Reliability modeling of uncertain competing failure degradation system with a change point

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71601101

Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi 2019L0738

Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi 2020L0463

More Information
  • 摘要:

    针对具有变点的竞争失效退化系统的可靠性进行了建模,系统同时遭受连续内部磨损退化和外部冲击,内部磨损退化由一个不确定过程表示,外部冲击过程是一个更新回报过程,即外部冲击到达的时间间隔和每次冲击的损坏量都是随机变量。外部环境条件的变化导致随机次数的冲击后损坏量服从的分布发生变化,通过运用不确定理论和机会理论,分别推导出系统在3种不同冲击模式下的确信可靠度公式,并通过数值算例验证了模型的正确性和有效性。

     

  • 图 1  极端冲击退化系统的确信可靠度曲线

    Figure 1.  Curve of belief reliability for extremeshock degradation system

    图 2  累积冲击退化系统的确信可靠度曲线

    Figure 2.  Curve of belief reliability for cumulativeshock degradation system

    图 3  δ-冲击退化系统的确信可靠度曲线

    Figure 3.  Curve of belief reliability for δ-shockdegradation system

  • [1] CUI L R, HUANG J B, LI Y.Degradation models with Wiener diffusion processes under calibrations[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2016, 65(2):613-623. doi: 10.1109/TR.2015.2484075
    [2] QIU Q A, CUI L R.Reliability evaluation based on a dependent two-stage failure process with competing failures[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2018, 64:699-712. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.039
    [3] RAFIEE K, FENG Q M, COIT D W.Reliability modeling for dependent competing failure processes with changing degradation rate[J].IIE Transactions, 2014, 46(5):483-496. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2013.812270
    [4] LIU B D.Uncertainty theory[M].2nd ed.Berlin:Springer, 2007.
    [5] LIU B D.Uncertainty theory:A branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty[M].Berlin:Springer, 2010.
    [6] LIU B D.Fuzzy process, hybrid process and uncertain process[J].Journal of Uncertain System, 2008, 2(1):3-16.
    [7] LIU B D.Some research problems in uncertainty theory[J].Journal of Uncertain Systems, 2009, 3(1):3-10.
    [8] ZHANG Z Q, YANG X F.Uncertain population model[J].Soft Computing, 2020, 24(2):2417-2423.
    [9] YAO K.First hitting time of uncertain random renewal reward process and its application in insurance risk process[J].Soft Computing, 2019, 23(11):3687-3696. doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3024-1
    [10] ZHANG Q Y, KANG R, WEN M L.A new method of level-2 uncertainty analysis in risk assessment based on uncertainty theory[J].Soft Computing, 2018, 22(17):5867-5877. doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3337-0
    [11] YAO K, LIU B D.Parameter estimation in uncertain differential equations[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2020, 19(1):1-12.
    [12] YANG X F, LIU B D.Uncertain time series analysis with imprecise observations[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2019, 18(3):263-278.
    [13] YAO K, ZHOU J.Renewal reward process with uncertain interarrival times and random rewards[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(3):1757-1762. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2017.2718965
    [14] GAO J W, YAO K, ZHOU J, et al.Reliability analysis of uncertain weighted k-out-of-n systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(5):2663-2671. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2806365
    [15] WEN M L, KANG R.Reliability analysis in uncertain random system[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2016, 15(4):491-506.
    [16] YAO K, GAO J W.Uncertain random alternating renewal process with application to interval availability[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2015, 23(5):1333-1342. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2014.2360551
    [17] YAO K, ZHOU J.Uncertain random renewal reward process with application to block replacement policy[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2016, 24(6):1637-1646. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2544354
    [18] ZENG Z G, WEN M L, KANG R.Belief reliability:A new metrics for products' reliability[J].Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2013, 12(1):15-27.
    [19] ZHANG Q Y, KANG R, WEN M L.Belief reliability for uncertain random systems[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 26(6):3605-3614. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2838560
    [20] ZHANG Q Y, ZENG Z G, ZIO E, et al.Probability box as a tool to model and control the effect of epistemic uncertainty in multiple dependent competing failure processes[J].Applied Soft Computing, 2017, 56:570-579. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.06.016
    [21] 潘刚, 尚朝轩, 梁玉英, 等.考虑认知不确定的雷达功率放大系统可靠性评估[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(6):1185-1194. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0390

    PAN G, SHANG C X, LIANG Y Y, et al.Reliability evaluation of radar power amplification system considering epistemic uncertainty[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(6):1185-1194(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0390
    [22] LI X Y, WU J P, LIU L, et al.Modeling accelerated degradation data based on the uncertain process[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 27(8):1532-1542. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2018.2883016
    [23] LIU B L, ZHANG Z Q, WEN Y Q.Reliability analysis for devices subject to competing failure processes based on chance theory[J].Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2019, 75:398-413. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.05.036
    [24] 康锐, 等.确信可靠性理论与方法[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2020.

    KANG R, et al.Belief reliability theory and methodology[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2020(in Chinese).
    [25] 师海燕, 魏淳, 温艳清, 等.不确定环境下竞争失效系统的可靠性分析[J/OL].北京航空航天大学学报, 2020(2020-03-24)[2020-04-13].https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0656.

    SHI H Y, WEI C, WEN Y Q, et al.Reliability analysis for systems subject to competing failure processes based on uncertainty theory[J/OL].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020(2020-03-24)[2020-04-13].https://doi.org/10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0656(in Chinese).
    [26] ZHAO X, CAI K, WANG X Y, et al.Optimal replacement policies for a shock model with a change point[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2018, 118:383-393.
    [27] ERYILMAZ S, KAN C.Reliability and optimal replacement policy for an extreme shock model with a change point[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 190:106513. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.106513
    [28] LIU B D.Toward uncertain finance theory[J].Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 2013, 1:1-15. doi: 10.1186/2195-5468-1-1
    [29] LIU Y H.Uncertain random variables:A mixture of uncertainty and randomness[J].Soft Computing, 2013, 17(4):119-124.
    [30] AGRAWAL G P, DUTTA N K.Semiconductor laser[M].Berlin:Springer, 2013.
  • 加载中
图(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  576
  • HTML全文浏览量:  90
  • PDF下载量:  76
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-13
  • 录用日期:  2020-06-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-11-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答