留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

航空电子AFDX与AVB传输实时性抗干扰对比

赵琳 何锋 熊华钢

赵琳, 何锋, 熊华钢等 . 航空电子AFDX与AVB传输实时性抗干扰对比[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(12): 2359-2369. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0908
引用本文: 赵琳, 何锋, 熊华钢等 . 航空电子AFDX与AVB传输实时性抗干扰对比[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(12): 2359-2369. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0908
ZHAO Lin, HE Feng, XIONG Huaganget al. Comparison of real-time anti-jamming transmission for avionics AFDX and AVB[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(12): 2359-2369. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0908(in Chinese)
Citation: ZHAO Lin, HE Feng, XIONG Huaganget al. Comparison of real-time anti-jamming transmission for avionics AFDX and AVB[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(12): 2359-2369. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0908(in Chinese)

航空电子AFDX与AVB传输实时性抗干扰对比

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0908
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金 61301086

中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金 YWF-15-GJSYS-055

详细信息
    作者简介:

    赵琳 女, 博士研究生。主要研究方向:实时网络

    何锋 男, 博士, 讲师。主要研究方向:航空电子综合、实时调度、实时网络

    熊华钢 男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向:航空电子综合、机载网络

    通讯作者:

    何锋, E-mail: robinleo@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V247;TP393

Comparison of real-time anti-jamming transmission for avionics AFDX and AVB

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61301086

the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities YWF-15-GJSYS-055

More Information
  • 摘要:

    为满足未来航电系统音视频信息传输的需求,考虑车载嵌入式系统的候选实时多媒体网络AVB在航电环境中的应用,并对AVB与AFDX的传输进行了对比研究。首先构建AVB与AFDX标准对比;其次提出基于网络演算的AVB和AFDX端到端延迟计算方法;然后通过定义不同的消息传输场景,采用理论方法分析消息传输实时性的干扰要素;最后利用仿真方法予以验证。在典型1 000条虚拟链路的组网规模下,结果显示:AFDX高优先级流量的端到端延迟优于AVB,对于低优先级流量端到端延迟,则AVB和AFDX各有优劣;但受突发的流量影响,在增加50条各0.22 Mbit/s带宽的低优先级流量干扰情况下,高优先级流量平均端到端延迟的变化率在AVB中为0.25%,在AFDX中为0.38%;在增加50条各0.22 Mbit/s带宽的高优先级流量干扰情况下,低优先级流量平均端到端延迟的变化率在AVB中为5.17%,在AFDX中为10.25%。结果表明:时间敏感消息在AVB网络中传输实时性的抗干扰能力优于AFDX。

     

  • 图 1  AFDX流量调度机制

    Figure 1.  Traffic scheduling mechanism in AFDX

    图 2  AVB流量调度机制

    Figure 2.  Traffic scheduling mechanism in AVB

    图 3  CBS算法

    Figure 3.  CBS algorithm

    图 4  网络演算模型对比

    Figure 4.  Comparison of network calculus models

    图 5  AVB中的帧传输模型Ⅰ

    Figure 5.  The first model of frame transmission in AVB

    图 6  AVB中的帧传输模型Ⅱ

    Figure 6.  The second model of frame transmission in AVB

    图 7  简单AFDX拓扑

    Figure 7.  Simple AFDX topology

    图 8  网络拓扑

    Figure 8.  Network topology

    图 9  AVB与AFDX流量延迟对比

    Figure 9.  Comparison of traffic delay in AVB and AFDX

    图 10  VL151延迟变化对比

    Figure 10.  Comparison of VL151 delay variation

    表  1  SR_A类和SR_B类参数

    Table  1.   Parameters of SR_A and SR_B

    类型 优先级 最大帧长/Byte 发送频率/μs 7跳最大延迟/ms 最大抖动/μs
    SR_A 1 171 125 2 125
    SR_B 1 500 250 50 1 000
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  端到端延迟对比

    Table  2.   Comparison of end-to-end delay

    μs
    VL 最小延迟 平均延迟 最大延迟 真实最坏延迟[21] 组网络演算最坏延迟[21]
    1 152.14 152.76 267.47 272 273.6
    2 152.14 152.42 190.12 192 192.4
    3 152.17 153.10 254.06 272 273.6
    4 152.16 152.82 271.10 272 273.6
    5 96.08 96.57 160.15 176 177.6
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  配置信息

    Table  3.   Configuration information

    VLi 源节点 目的节点 帧长/Byte AFDX AVB
    BAG/ms 流量类型 ServiceRate/ms MIF 流量类型
    1~50 72 2 低优先级 40 20 SR_B
    51~150 172 16 高优先级 160 10 SR_A
    151~350 800 128 低优先级 1 280 10 SR_B
    351~450 100 8 高优先级 40 5 SR_A
    451~650 200 32 高优先级 320 10 SR_A
    651~850 372 64 低优先级 320 5 SR_B
    851~950 72 4 高优先级 40 10 SR_A
    951~1 000 872 32 高优先级 160 5 SR_A
    951~1 000 872 32 低优先级 160 5 SR_B
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  VL151~350平均端到端延迟对比

    Table  4.   Comparison of average end-to-end delay for VL151~350

    场景 平均端到端延迟/ms
    AFDX AVB
    场景1 19.292 15.053
    场景2 21.270 15.831
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  VL851~950平均端到端延迟对比

    Table  5.   Comparison of average end-to-enddelay for VL851~950

    场景 平均端到端延迟/ms
    AFDX AVB
    场景1 2.901 3.561
    场景2 2.912 3.570
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ARINC 664.Aircraft data network, Part 7:Avionics full duplex switched Ethernet(AFDX)network[S].Annapolis:Aeronautical Radio, 2005:9-18.
    [2] 蒲小勃.现代航空电子系统与综合[M].北京:航空工业出版社, 2013:55-89.

    PU X B.Modern avionics system and integration[M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2013:55-89(in Chinese).
    [3] IEEE 802.1 AVB Task Group.IEEE 802.1 audio/video bridging (AVB)[EB/OL].(2013-03-20)[2016-04-10].http://www.ieee802.org/1/pages/avbridges.html.
    [4] STEINBACH T, LIM H T, KORF F, et al.Tomorrow's in-car interconnect A competitive evaluation of IEEE 802.1 AVB and time-triggered ethernet(AS6802)[C]//2012 IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:1-5. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6398932/
    [5] ALDERISI G, IANNIZZOTTO G, BELLO L L.Towards 802.1 Ethernet AVB for advanced driver assistance systems:A preliminary assessment[C]//2012 IEEE 17th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:1-4. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6489775/
    [6] ZINNER H, NOEBAUER J, SEITZ J, et al.A comparison of time synchronization in AVB and FlexRay in-vehicle networks[C]//2011 Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Intelligent Solutions in Embedded Systems. Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2011:67-72. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6086021/
    [7] 熊华钢, 王中华.先进航空电子综合技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2009:85-90.

    XIONG H G, WANG Z H.Advanced avionics integration techniques[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2009:85-90(in Chinese).
    [8] GEYER F, HEIDINGER E, SCHNEELE S, et al.Evaluation of audio/video bridging forwarding method in avionics switched Ethernet context[C]//2013 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2013:000711-000716. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6755032/
    [9] HEIDINGER E, GEYER F, SCHNEELE S, et al.A performance study of audio video bridging in aeronautic Ethernet networks[C]//7th IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:67-75. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6356571/
    [10] JEON S, LEE J, PARK S.Dual-path method for enhancing the performance of IEEE 802.1 AVB with time-triggered scheme[C]//201521st Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2015:519-523. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7412564/
    [11] MEYER P, STEINBACH T, KORF F, et al.Extending IEEE 802.1 AVB with time-triggered scheduling:A simulation study of the coexistence of synchronous and asynchronous traffic[C]//IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2011:47-54. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6737589/
    [12] ALDERISI G, IANNIZZOTTO G, BELLO L L.Simulative assessments of IEEE 802.1 Ethernet AVB and time-triggered Ethernet for advanced driver assistance systems and in-car infotainment[C]//2012 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2012:187-194.
    [13] 王彤, 赵琳, 何锋.航空电子音视频传输AVB以太网络[J].电光与控制, 2016, 23(1):1-6. http://www.doc88.com/p-5117628076628.html

    WANG T, ZHAO L, HE F.Research on audio video bridging(AVB) for avionics network[J].Electronics Optics & Control, 2016, 23(1):1-6(in Chinese). http://www.doc88.com/p-5117628076628.html
    [14] IEEE.IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks, virtual bridged local area networks, Amendment 14:Stream reservation protocol (SRP)[S].New York:IEEE, 2010:1-5.
    [15] IEEE.IEEE standard for local and metropolitan area networks, virtual bridged local area networks, Amendment 12:Forwarding and queuing enhancements for time-sensitive streams[S].New York:IEEE, 2009:1-17.
    [16] BOUDEC J Y L.Network calculus:A theory of deterministic queuing systems for the Internet[M].Berlin:Springer, 2001:7-24.
    [17] CRUZ R L.A calculus for network delay.Part Ⅰ. Network elements in isolation[J].IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 1991, 37(1):114-131. doi: 10.1109/18.61109
    [18] CRUZ R L. A calculus for network delay. Part Ⅱ. Network analysis[J].IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, 1991, 37(1):132-141. doi: 10.1109/18.61110
    [19] CHANG C S.Performance guarantees in communication networks[M].London:Springer, 2000:4-22.
    [20] SCHARBARG J L, RIDOUARD F, FRABOUL C.A probabilistic analysis of end-to-end delays on an AFDX avionic network[J]. IEEE Transaction on Industrial Informatics, 2009, 5(1):28-41. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4799340/
    [21] BAUER H, SCHARBARG J L, FRABOUL C.Improving the worst-case delay analysis of an AFDX network using an optimized trajectory approach[J].IEEE Transaction on Industrial Information, 2010, 6(4):521-533. doi: 10.1109/TII.2010.2055877
    [22] MANDERSCHEID M, LANGER F.Network calculus for the validation of automotive Ethernet in-vehicle network configuration[C]//2011 International Conference on Cyber-Enable Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2011:206-211. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?reload=true&tp=&arnumber=6079426&contentType=Conference+Publications&matchBoolean%3Dtrue%26searchField%3DSearch_All%26queryText%3D%28%28ethernet%29+AND+automotive%29
    [23] BAUER H, SCHARBARG J L, FRABOUL C. Applying trajectory approach to AFDX avionics network[C]//14th Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation.Piscataway, NJ:IEEE Press, 2009:1-8.
    [24] 代真, 何锋, 张宇静, 等.AFDX虚拟链路路径实时寻优算法[J].航空学报, 2015, 36(6):1924-1932. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/91925X/201506/665073753.html

    DAI Z, HE F, ZHANG Y J, et al.Real-time path optimization algorithm of AFDX virtual link[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(6):1924-1932(in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/91925X/201506/665073753.html
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1040
  • HTML全文浏览量:  130
  • PDF下载量:  638
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-12-01
  • 录用日期:  2017-02-24
  • 网络出版日期:  2017-12-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答