Design, analysis, and experimentation of SMA-driven multi-state variable camber wing
-
摘要:
变弯度作为变形机翼最典型的一种变形形式,在未来智能飞行器设计领域具有广阔应用前景。针对多状态、连续变弯度机翼的设计需求,提出一种结合模块化刚柔耦合结构、交叉簧片式铰链、多级形状记忆合金(SMA)驱动器的新型变弯度机翼设计方案。针对该方案,结合交叉簧片式铰链等效刚度计算方法,推导单级、多级模块单元的等效刚度结构力学模型,并通过有限元分析完成对比验证;搭建准静态流固耦合分析模型,通过SMA完全相变驱动方式验证所提变弯度机翼方案的多状态调节能力、多工况适应性,并给出各变形状态对气动系数的影响规律;研制原理样机并搭建测试平台,完成基于前馈开环控制策略的多状态变形控制效果,验证了所提多状态变弯度机翼设计的工程可行性。
Abstract:The most common type of morphing wing in the field of intelligent aircraft design for the future is variable camber, which offers a wealth of opportunities. This paper addresses the design requirements of a multi-state, continuously variable camber wing and proposes a novel design scheme integrating a modular rigid-flexible coupling structure, cross-leaf hinge, and multi-stage shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators. According to the scheme, the equivalent stiffness structural mechanics model of single-stage and multi-stage modular elements is derived by combining the equivalent stiffness calculation method of the cross-leaf hinge, and the comparison and verification are completed by finite element analysis. Furthermore, a quasi-static fluid-structure coupling analysis model was established, verifying the proposed variable camber wing scheme’s multi-state adjustment capability and adaptability under various conditions using SMA’s full phase transition driving, and providing the impact patterns of each deformation state on aerodynamic coefficients. Finally, a conceptual prototype was developed, and a testing platform was constructed. A feedforward open-loop control technique based on multi-state deformation control was successfully implemented, confirming the engineering feasibility of the suggested multi-state variable camber wing design.
-
Key words:
- variable camber wing /
- cross-leaf hinge /
- multi-state /
- shape memory alloy /
- experimental verification
-
表 1 机翼多状态变形
Table 1. Multiple-state deformation of the wing
加热位置 变形状态 SET1 状态1 SET2 状态2 SET3 状态3 SET1、SET2 状态4 SET2、SET3 状态5 SET1、SET2、SET3 状态6 表 2 计算工况
Table 2. Calculate operating conditions
Ma Re α/(°) 0.3 105 4 表 3 实验数据与仿真数据相对误差
Table 3. Relative error between experimental and simulation data
变形状态 相对误差/% 状态1 3.88 状态2 3.09 状态3 2.59 状态4 7.36 状态5 7.08 状态6 8.96 表 4 机翼各变形状态的等效偏转角
Table 4. The equivalent deflection angles of the wing in various deformation states
变形状态 等效偏转角/(°) 状态1 5.0 状态2 8.0 状态3 10.5 状态4 11.8 状态5 15.6 状态6 17.8 -
[1] 周文雅, 张宗宇, 王晓明, 等. 机翼中小尺度主动变形研究进展及关键技术[J]. 机械工程学报, 2021, 57(2): 121-138.ZHOU W Y, ZHANG Z Y, WANG X M, et al. Research progress and key techniques of active morphing wing at medium and small scales[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 57(2): 121-138(in Chinese). [2] 王彬文, 杨宇, 钱战森, 等. 机翼变弯度技术研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 024943.WANG B W, YANG Y, QIAN Z S, et al. Technical development of variable camber wing: review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(1): 024943(in Chinese). [3] SHI X T, YANG Y, WANG Z G, et al. Design and shape monitoring of a morphing wing trailing edge[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(2): 127. [4] LI Y Z, GE W J, ZHOU J, et al. Design and experiment of concentrated flexibility-based variable camber morphing wing[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(5): 455-469. [5] ZHAO A M, ZOU H, JIN H C, et al. Structural design and verification of an innovative whole adaptive variable camber wing[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 89: 11-18. [6] CAMPANILE L F, SACHAU D. The belt-rib concept: a structronic approach to variable camber[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2000, 11(3): 215-224. [7] 张盛, 杨宇, 王志刚, 等. 变弯度机翼后缘偏心梁设计与验证[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 525892.ZHANG S, YANG Y, WANG Z G, et al. Design and validation of eccentric beam for variable camber trailing edge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 525892(in Chinese). [8] GONG X B, REN C W, SUN J, et al. 3D zero Poisson’s ratio honeycomb structure for morphing wing applications[J]. Biomimetics, 2022, 7(4): 198. [9] 王志刚, 杨宇, 段世慧. 基于参数化分析的柔性后缘优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(增刊1): 721562.WANG Z G, YANG Y, DUAN S H. Optimal design of flexible trailing edge based on parametric analysis[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(Sup 1): 721562(in Chinese). [10] 赵立杰, 邸超, 李凯, 等. 多相材料机翼前缘柔性机构拓扑优化设计[J]. 机械设计, 2019, 36(1): 86-90.ZHAO L J, DI C, LI K, et al. Topology optimization for the compliant wing’s leading edge based on the multi-phase materials[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2019, 36(1): 86-90(in Chinese). [11] 徐钧恒, 杨晓钧, 李兵. 基于交叉簧片式铰链的变弯度机翼机构设计[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(3): 444-451.XU J H, YANG X J, LI B. Design of wing mechanism with variable camber based on cross-spring flexural pivots[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(3): 444-451(in Chinese). [12] BRAGA R, RODRIGUES P F, CORDEIRO H, et al. The study of new NiTi actuators to reinforce the wing movement of aircraft systems[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(14): 4787. [13] LEE S Y, LEE G Y. Largely deformable torsional soft morphing actuator created by twisted shape memory alloy wire and its application to a soft morphing wing[J]. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13(1): 17629. [14] SILVA G C, SILVESTRE F, DONADON M V. A nonlinear aerothermoelastic model for slender composite beam-like wings with embedded shape memory alloys[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 287: 115367. [15] PICCIRILLO V, GÓES L C S, BALTHAZAR J M, et al. Deflection control of an aeroelastic system utilizing an antagonistic shape memory alloy actuator[J]. Meccanica, 2018, 53(4-5): 727-745. [16] CHEN J J, SHEN X, LI J F. Zero Poisson’s ratio flexible skin for potential two-dimensional wing morphing[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 45: 228-241. [17] ZHAO H Z, BI S S. Accuracy characteristics of the generalized cross-spring pivot[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2010, 45(10): 1434-1448. [18] BRINSON L C. One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable[J]. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 1993, 4(2): 229-242. -


下载: