留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

航空柱塞泵缸体倾覆行为仿真及试验研究

谷建宁 张小波 夏天翔 王天照

谷建宁,张小波,夏天翔,等. 航空柱塞泵缸体倾覆行为仿真及试验研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1666-1679
引用本文: 谷建宁,张小波,夏天翔,等. 航空柱塞泵缸体倾覆行为仿真及试验研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1666-1679
GU J N,ZHANG X B,XIA T X,et al. Simulation and experimental research for overturning behavior of aviation plunger pump cylinder bodies[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1666-1679 (in Chinese)
Citation: GU J N,ZHANG X B,XIA T X,et al. Simulation and experimental research for overturning behavior of aviation plunger pump cylinder bodies[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1666-1679 (in Chinese)

航空柱塞泵缸体倾覆行为仿真及试验研究

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0054
基金项目: 

航空科学基金(20182876003)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:www.1198@foxmail.com

  • 中图分类号: TH137;V233.91

Simulation and experimental research for overturning behavior of aviation plunger pump cylinder bodies

Funds: 

Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20182876003)

More Information
  • 摘要:

    航空柱塞泵是航空液压系统的核心,其内部零部件倾覆过大可能会使整个系统性能下降,甚至失效。如何提高航空柱塞泵的稳定性、减小零部件倾覆一直是其高压高速化发展研究的关键问题。为此,从缸体振动位移角度出发,建立一种基于数据驱动的高保真动力学模型,探究柱塞泵出口压力和转速对缸体倾覆的影响,提出减小配流盘腰形槽尺寸的改进措施,并通过数值仿真进行验证。研究结果表明:减小配流盘腰形槽尺寸能使缸体倾覆有所改善;修正后的模型能够反映实际的倾覆状态,与试验测量结果相对误差在5%以内。研究成果为航空柱塞泵的仿真和稳定性研究提供了研究思路,为批产一致性制造提供理论和试验支撑。

     

  • 图 1  典型柱塞泵结构示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of typical plunger pump structure

    图 2  柱塞受力分析示意图

    Figure 2.  Schematic diagram of plunger force analysis

    图 3  柱塞滑靴组件运动分析简图

    Figure 3.  Schematic diagram of piston slide boot assembly motion analysis

    图 4  航空柱塞泵系统仿真模型

    Figure 4.  System simulation model of aviation plunger pump

    图 5  负载压力-负载流量特性曲线对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of load pressure-load flow characteristic curves

    图 6  主轴-缸体系统多刚体动力学仿真模型

    Figure 6.  Multi rigid body dynamic simulation model of spindle-cylinder system

    图 7  多刚体动力学仿真结果与理论结果的对比

    Figure 7.  The comparison of multi rigid body dynamics simulation results with theoretical results

    图 8  联合仿真结果与理论结果的对比

    Figure 8.  The comparison between joint simulation results and theoretical results

    图 9  主轴-缸体系统刚柔耦合动力学模型

    Figure 9.  The rigid flexible coupling dynamic model of the spindle-cylinder system

    图 10  仿真得到的缸体振动位移

    Figure 10.  Simulated cylinder vibration displacement

    图 11  柱塞泵试验台

    Figure 11.  Plunger pump test bench

    图 12  缸体倾覆示意图

    Figure 12.  Schematic diagram of cylinder overturning

    图 13  额定工况和初始状态前4个周期的测量结果

    Figure 13.  Measurement results for the first four cycles of rated operating conditions and initial state

    图 14  额定工况时的缸体倾覆角变化曲线

    Figure 14.  Cylinder overturning angle variation curve under rated operating conditions

    图 15  额定工况时的径向偏离位移变化曲线

    Figure 15.  Radial deviation displacement variation curve under rated operating conditions

    图 16  缸体倾覆方位角示意图

    Figure 16.  Schematic diagram of cylinder overturning azimuth angle

    图 17  额定工况时缸体倾覆最剧烈的位置

    Figure 17.  The position where the cylinder overturns the most severely under rated operating conditions

    图 18  配流盘端面磨损情况

    Figure 18.  Wear condition of the end face of the distribution plate

    图 19  压力区包角示意图

    Figure 19.  The schematic diagram of pressure zone envelope angle

    图 20  压力区包角在一个周期内的变化情况

    Figure 20.  The variation of pressure zone envelope angle within one cycle

    图 21  改进前后数值仿真结果对比

    Figure 21.  The comparison of numerical simulation results before and after improvement

    图 22  径向偏离位移均方根值与修正参数的关系

    Figure 22.  The relationship between radial deviation displacement root mean square value and correction parameters

    图 23  径向偏离位移1倍频幅值与修正参数的关系

    Figure 23.  The relationship between radial deviation displacement 1 fold frequency amplitude and correction parameters

    表  1  电涡流位移传感器的技术指标

    Table  1.   Technical specifications of eddy current displacement sensors

    参数值及
    要求
    探头到缸体
    的距离/mm
    零点/
    mm
    灵敏度/
    (V·mm−1)
    平均灵敏度
    误差/%
    典型分辨
    率/μm
    工作
    温度/℃
    承受
    压力/MPa
    非线性
    误差/%
    探头
    直径/mm
    频响/kHz 探头
    长度/mm
    校核
    方式
    供电
    电压/V
    CWY-DO电涡流
    位移传感器参数
    0.2~1.2 0.2 8 不超过±5 1 −20~120 0.2~0.4 不超过±1 5 0~10 40 铁磁性
    校核
    12~15
    试验环境要求 >0.3 ≤1 室温 约0.3 ≤6 >6.92 >21.3 不锈钢
    材质
    +9/±15
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  相同转速、不同出口压力时缸体径向偏离位移的均方根值和1倍频幅值

    Table  2.   The root mean square value and 1st harmonic amplitude of radial deviation displacement of cylinder body at the same rotational speed and different outlet pressures

    测量
    工况
    径向偏离位移
    均方根值/mm
    径向偏离位移
    1倍频幅值/mm
    10 MPa 0.07104 0.00871
    20 MPa 0.03066 0.00156
    35 MPa 0.03741 0.00546
    75%全流量 0.03931 0.00768
    50%全流量 0.03347 0.00579
    25%全流量 0.03022 0.00517
    0流量 0.03461 0.00698
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  相同出口压力、不同转速时缸体径向偏离位移的均方根值和1倍频幅值

    Table  3.   The root mean square value and 1st harmonic amplitude of radial deviation displacement of cylinder body at the same outlet pressure and different rotational speeds

    测量工况 径向偏离位移
    均方根值/mm
    径向偏离位移
    1倍频幅值/mm
    20%额定转速 0.04589 0.03231
    40%额定转速 0.04085 0.01493
    60%额定转速 0.04062 0.01110
    80%额定转速 0.03949 0.00623
    100%额定转速 0.03741 0.00546
    110%额定转速 0.03613 0.00596
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  相同转速、不同出口压力时缸体倾覆最剧烈的位置

    Table  4.   The most severe overturning position of the cylinder body at the same rotational speed and different outlet pressures

    测量工况 缸体倾覆最剧烈的位置区间/(°)
    10 MPa 130.56~167.59
    20 MPa 32.41~57.28
    35 MPa 29.61~56.91
    75%全流量 48.63~84.39
    50%全流量 41.43~73.84
    25%全流量 16.12~51.39
    0流量 49.89~74.80
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  相同出口压力、不同转速时缸体倾覆最剧烈的位置

    Table  5.   The most severe overturning position of the cylinder body at the same outlet pressure and different rotational speeds

    测量工况 缸体倾覆最剧烈的位置区间/(°)
    20%额定转速 40.63~80.13
    40%额定转速 57.43~66.77
    60%额定转速 9.26~40.90
    80%额定转速 45.92~79.81
    100%额定转速 29.61~56.91
    110%额定转速 44.45~46.96
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李玉龙, 何永勇, 雒建斌. 航空柱塞泵关键摩擦副表面改性与性能增强[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 61(12): 1405-1422.

    LI Y L, HE Y Y, LUO J B. Surface modifications and performance enhancements of key friction pairs in aviation hydraulic piston pumps[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2021, 61(12): 1405-1422(in Chinese).
    [2] 刘伟. 航空柱塞泵常见故障原因与分析[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2023(9): 59-61.

    LIU W. Causes and analysis of common faults in aviation piston pump[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2023(9): 59-61(in Chinese).
    [3] 杨毅博, 李运华. 全飞行剖面下的航空液压泵热载荷分析与温度预测[J]. 液压与气动, 2021, 45(8): 34-38.

    YANG Y B, LI Y H. Thermal load analysis and temperature prediction of aviation hydraulic pump under full flight profile[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2021, 45(8): 34-38(in Chinese).
    [4] 陈远玲, 班成周, 刘银水, 等. 航空柱塞泵配流副磨损模型与寿命预测[J]. 液压与气动, 2020, 44(12): 1-7.

    CHEN Y L, BAN C Z, LIU Y S, et al. Wear model and life prediction of port pair in aircraft piston pump[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2020, 44(12): 1-7(in Chinese).
    [5] 欧阳小平, 王天照, 方旭. 高速航空柱塞泵研究现状[J]. 液压与气动, 2018, 42(2): 1-8.

    OUYANG X P, WANG T Z, FANG X. Research status of the high speed aircraft piston pump[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2018, 42(2): 1-8(in Chinese).
    [6] 陈金华, 郭生荣, 卢岳良. 民机发动机驱动泵的长寿命设计技术[J]. 液压与气动, 2021, 45(8): 160-170.

    CHEN J H, GUO S R, LU Y L. Long life design technology of civil aircraft engine driven pump[J]. Chinese Hydraulics & Pneumatics, 2021, 45(8): 160-170(in Chinese).
    [7] 郭生荣. 飞机机电流体系统综合技术[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2020: 63.

    GUO S R. Integrated technology of aircraft electromechanical fluid system[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2020: 63(in Chinese).
    [8] 张绍九. 液压密封[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012.

    ZHANG S J. Hydraulics seals[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2012(in Chinese).
    [9] MANRING N D. Tipping the cylinder block of an axial-piston swash-plate type hydrostatic machine[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2000, 122(1): 216-221.
    [10] BERGADA J M, DAVIES D L, KUMAR S, et al. The effect of oil pressure and temperature on barrel film thickness and barrel dynamics of an axial piston pump[J]. Meccanica, 2012, 47(3): 639-654.
    [11] ZHANG J H, CHAO Q, XU B. Analysis of the cylinder block tilting inertia moment and its effect on the performance of high-speed electro-hydrostatic actuator pumps of aircraft[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(1): 169-177.
    [12] 胡骁, 王少萍, 韩磊. 轴向柱塞泵配流副动态压力分布建模与仿真[J]. 液压气动与密封, 2012, 32(8): 68-71.

    HU X, WANG S P, HAN L. Modeling and simulation on pressure distribution of plane port pair in axial piston pump[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2012, 32(8): 68-71(in Chinese).
    [13] WEGNER S, GELS S, JANG D S, et al. Experimental investigation of the cylinder block movement in an axial piston machine[C]//Proceedings of the ASME/BATH 2015 Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control. New York: ASME, 2016.
    [14] 闫伟鹏. 轴向柱塞泵配流副抗倾覆稳定性及油膜润滑特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020.

    YAN W P. Research on stability against tipping and lubrication characteristics of cylinder block/valve plate in axial piston pumps[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020(in Chinese).
    [15] XU H G, ZHANG J H, SUN G M, et al. The direct measurement of the cylinder block dynamic characteristics based on a non-contact method in an axial piston pump[J]. Measurement, 2021, 167: 108279.
    [16] 张英臣, 卢岳良, 夏天翔, 等. 恒压式变量柱塞泵建模及特性分析[C]//第八届中国航空学会青年科技论坛. 北京: 中国航空学会, 2018: 610-616.

    ZHANG Y C, LU Y L, XIA T X, et al. Modeling and analyzing of the characteristics of the constant-pressure variable plunger pump[C]//Proceedings of the 8th China Aviation Society Youth Science and Technology Forum. Beijing: Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018: 610-616(in Chinese).
    [17] 辛永发. 基于刚-柔-液耦合的轴向柱塞泵缸体振动特性分析[D]. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2022.

    XIN Y F. Analysis of vibration characteristics of axial piston pump cylinder based on rigid-flex-liquid coupling[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University of Technology, 2022(in Chinese).
    [18] 邓海顺, 黄坤, 王传礼, 等. 平衡式两排轴向柱塞泵缸体倾覆力矩[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1468-1473.

    DENG H S, HUANG K, WANG C L, et al. Overturning moment of cylinder of balanced two-ring axial piston pump[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2015, 45(5): 1468-1473(in Chinese).
    [19] 李壮云. 液压元件与系统[M]. 3版. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2011.

    LI Z Y. Hydraulic components and systems[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Mechine Press, 2011(in Chinese).
    [20] 李晶, 吴双伟. 轴向柱塞泵配流副楔形油膜温度特性[J]. 中国工程机械学报, 2019, 17(1): 8-14.

    LI J, WU S W. Temperature characteristics of plane port pair of axial piston pump[J]. Chinese Journal of Construction Machinery, 2019, 17(1): 8-14(in Chinese).
    [21] YANG H J, JIANG J H, CHEN G P, et al. Dynamic load identification based on deep convolution neural network[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2023, 185: 109757.
    [22] 张昊冉, 陈国平, 何欢. C/SiC复合材料结构件热模态模型建模和修正方法[J]. 振动工程学报, 2023, 36(6): 1546-1554.

    ZHANG H R, CHEN G P, HE H. Modeling and modification methods of thermal modal model of C/SiC composite structure[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2023, 36(6): 1546-1554(in Chinese).
    [23] HAGAN M T, DEMUTH H B, BEALE M H. 神经网络设计[M]. 戴葵译. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2002.

    HAGAN M T, PEMUTH H B, BEALE M H. Neural network design[M]. DAI K translated. Beijing: China Mechine Press, 2002(in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(23) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  88
  • HTML全文浏览量:  25
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-01-22
  • 录用日期:  2024-04-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-24
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-05-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答