Influence of transport aircraft wake vortex on parachute and calculation method of formation airdrop spacing
-
摘要:
运输机编队空投能在最短的时间内让更多的物资投送到指定地点,追求高效的同时也要考虑运输机尾涡给空投带来的危险。针对此问题,提出运输机尾涡对空投伞的影响与编队空投间距计算方法。建立空投伞降落过程遭遇尾涡的风险评估模型;对运输机编队空投的危险性计算分析;对空投中的运输机编队飞行的安全间距计算分析。研究结果表明:“一”字形编队空投时空投伞处于尾涡危险区域的时间是“人”字形编队空投的2.0倍。随着空投高度的增加,运输机飞行速度、空投伞伞冠半径、开始打开空投伞的时间点、温度偏差这4个因素对空投伞降落过程中处于尾涡危险区域的时间的影响都是先增加再减小。3架C-17运输机“人”字形编队空投,当空投高度从100~1 000 m变化时,若左右间距为100 m不变,安全的前后间距随着空投高度的升高在逐渐变大,从500 m开始,空投高度每增加100 m,安全的前后间距就增加20 m。若前后间距为3 500 m不变,空投高度为100~200 m对应安全的左右间距为100 m;空投高度为300~
1000 m对应安全的左右间距为110 m。Abstract:The pursuit of high efficiency should take into account the risk that the transport aircraft wake vortex poses to the parachute, even though the transport aircraft formation airdrop can carry more equipment and commodities to the designated location in the shortest amount of time. In order to solve this problem, the research on the influence of transport aircraft wake vortex on parachute and the calculation method of formation airdrop spacing is proposed. Firstly, the risk assessment model of the wake vortex encountered during the airdrop parachute landing process was established. Secondly, the danger of the transport aircraft formation airdrop was calculated and analyzed. Thirdly, the safety transport aircraft formation airdrop spacing was calculated and analyzed. The results show that the time of the single file formation airdrop in the wake vortex danger area is 2.0 times that of the herringbone formation airdrop. With the increase of the airdrop altitude, the influence of the four factors of the transport aircraft's flight speed, the radius of the parachute canopy, the time to open the parachute, and the temperature deviation on the time of the airdrop parachute during landing in the wake vortex danger area increases first and then decreases. Three C-17 transport aircraft were airdropped in a herringbone formation when the airdrop altitude changed from 100 meters to
1000 meters. If the left and right spacing is 100 meters, the safe front and back spacing gradually increases with the increase of the airdrop altitude, starting from 500 meters, the airdrop altitude increases by 20 meters for every 100 meters. When the airdrop altitude shifts from 100 to 200 meters, the safe left and right spacing is 100 meters; when the airdrop altitude shifts from 300 to 1 000 meters, the safe left and right spacing is 110 meters if the front and rear spacing is 3 500 meters.-
Key words:
- wake vortex field /
- formation airdrop /
- parachute /
- wake vortex encounter /
- airdrop altitude
-
表 1 空投伞参数
Table 1. Airdrop parachute parameters
空投伞及
附属物的
质量/kg空投伞未打开前
附属物的
阻力系数附属物的
参考面积/
m2空投伞的最小参考
面积(即空投伞
未打开时)/m2118 0.5 1.6 0.25 -
[1] HARTJES S, VAN HELLENBERG HUBAR M E G, VISSER H G. Multiple-phase trajectory optimization for formation flight in civil aviation[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2019, 10(2): 453-462. [2] HU Y, DAI W, PRATS MENÉNDEZ X. An optimization method of formation flight for minimizing fuel consumption[J]. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2021, 38(2): 306-315. [3] ANTCZAK A, LASEK M, SIBILSKI K. Efficient positioning of two long-range passenger aircraft in formation flight[J]. Transactions on Aerospace Research, 2022(3): 21-31. [4] ZHANG J, SHENG H L, CHEN Q, et al. A four-dimensional space-time automatic obstacle avoidance trajectory planning method for multi-UAV cooperative formation flight[J]. Drones, 2022, 6(8): 192. [5] SHENG H L, ZHANG J, YAN Z Y, et al. New multi-UAV formation keeping method based on improved artificial potential field[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(11): 249-270. [6] 徐肖豪, 孟令航, 赵嶷飞. 基于几何方法的洲际航空编队飞行路径规划[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2015, 41(7): 1155-1164.XU X H, MENG L H, ZHAO Y F. Geometric approach for intercontinental formation flight path planning[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2015, 41(7): 1155-1164(in Chinese). [7] 谷润平, 代树旺, 魏志强. 基于尾流效应的编队飞行优化分析[J]. 飞行力学, 2021, 39(1): 23-28.GU R P, DAI S W, WEI Z Q. Analysis of wake effect based formation flight optimization[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2021, 39(1): 23-28(in Chinese). [8] 朱战霞, 袁建平. 无人机编队飞行问题初探[J]. 飞行力学, 2003, 21(2): 5-7.ZHU Z X, YUAN J P. Discuss on formation flight of UAV[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2003, 21(2): 5-7(in Chinese). [9] 张佳龙, 闫建国, 张普, 等. 三架固定翼无人机协同编队飞行避障策略[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2019, 41(1): 123-129.ZHANG J L, YAN J G, ZHANG P, et al. Collision avoidance strategy of three fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles cooperative formation flight[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2019, 41(1): 123-129(in Chinese). [10] 郑锐平, 史静平, 屈晓波. 紧密编队飞行的建模控制与仿真[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2022, 40(5): 1039-1045.ZHENG R P, SHI J P, QU X B. Modeling, simulation, analysis and control of close formation flight[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2022, 40(5): 1039-1045(in Chinese). [11] CHEN J, SHI Z K. Aircraft modeling and simulation with cargo moving inside[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2009, 22(2): 191-197. [12] XU B, CHEN J. Review of modeling and control during transport airdrop process[J]. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2016, 13(6): 1729881416678142. [13] CAO Y H, WEI N. Flight trajectory simulation and aerodynamic parameter identification of large-scale parachute[J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2020, 2020: 5603169. [14] LI Y J, QU C Y, LI J, et al. Modelling of parachute airborne clusters flight dynamics and parachute interactions[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(1): 51. [15] 马骏, 孙秀霞, 董文瀚, 等. 运输机重装连续空投建模与特性分析[J]. 计算机仿真, 2013, 30(2): 66-70.MA J, SUN X X, DONG W H, et al. Modeling and analysis of transport aircraft heavy-weight sequential airdrop[J]. Computer Simulation, 2013, 30(2): 66-70(in Chinese). [16] 李山, 权文, 苏力德, 等. 基于改进NSGA-Ⅱ算法的双运输机重装空投研究[J]. 电光与控制, 2023, 30(10): 40-45.LI S, QUAN W, SU L D, et al. Heavy equipment airdrop of dual transport aircraft based on improved NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2023, 30(10): 40-45(in Chinese). [17] 郭鲲, 黄立桓, 谢秀川. 运输机空投降落伞落点散布影响因素仿真研究[J]. 长江信息通信, 2023, 36(1): 61-64.GUO K, HUANG L H, XIE X C. A simulation research on the impact factors of the dispersion of transport aircraft airdrop parachute’s landing positions[J]. Changjiang Information & Communications, 2023, 36(1): 61-64(in Chinese). [18] BORER N, BARROWS T, LEVINE D, et al. Formation airdrop scaling effects on aircraft wake vortex formation and interaction[C]//Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2013. -


下载: