Research on integrated scheduling of shipboard helicopters sortie operation on amphibious assault ship
-
摘要:
甲板作业调度是提升舰载机出动率的关键技术。针对两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业多阶段、高耦合特性,提出一种包含出库及甲板调运、机务勤务保障、出动离场在内的调度模型和优化算法。深入分析舰载直升机出动作业流程,基于各阶段的逻辑约束和资源约束,以最小化机群出动时间为优化目标,建立舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度模型;将该问题转化为具有转移时间特征的资源受限项目调度问题,基于串行调度生成机制,设计一种两段编码的遗传-邻域搜索算法求解。通过对12架舰载直升机集中出动案例进行仿真实验,验证了调度模型和优化算法在优化出动流程方面的有效性,显著降低了机群出动准备时间,进一步发现机务勤务保障阶段的决策在全局调度中更为关键。
Abstract:Deck operation scheduling is the key technology to improve the sortie rate of carrier-based aircraft. In view of the multi-stage and high coupling characteristics of amphibious assault ship carrier-borne helicopters operation, an integrated scheduling model and optimization algorithm were proposed, which included warehousing and deck transportation, maintenance service support, and sortie departure. First, an integrated scheduling model of carrier helicopter sortie operation was developed based on the resource and logical restrictions of each stage in order to reduce the duration of the sortie. Then, the problem is abstracted as a resource-constrained project scheduling problem with transition times, and a two-segment genetic-neighborhood search algorithm is designed to solve the problem based on a serial schedule generation scheme. Through simulation experiments conducted on the concentrated sortie cases of 12 shipboard helicopters, the effectiveness of the scheduling model and algorithm in optimizing the sortie process was verified. This significantly reduced the sortie preparation time for the helicopter group. Additionally, it was shown that the entire scheduling is more significantly impacted by decisions made during the maintenance service support phase.
-
表 1 停机位分配优先级
Table 1. Priority for gate assignment
初始机位 目标机位 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 停机区Ⅰ 停机区Ⅱ C1 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8 C2 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 7 停机区Ⅰ 1 2 3 4 5 6 停机区Ⅱ 6 5 4 3 2 1 表 2 保障工序及对资源需求
Table 2. Guaranteed processes and resource requirements
工序号 内容 设备 专业 1 虚拟开始 2 平台区机械检查 机械 3 下部机械检查 机械 4 旋翼展开 供电站 特设/机械 5 航电外观检查 航电 6 航电座舱检查 供电站 航电 7 任务数据加载 供电站 特设/航电 8 平台区特设检查 特设 9 下部特设检查 特设 10 特设座舱检查 供电站 特设 11 燃油加注 加油站 机械 12 惯导对准 航电 13 军械外观检查 军械 14 机载弹药挂载 军械 15 虚拟结束 表 3 不同算法对比结果
Table 3. Comparison results of different algorithms
算法 最小化机群出动时间/min 收敛到最优值的
最小评价次数平均值平均值 最优值 方差 G-NSA 76.7 75.9 0.958 2940 GA 77.1 75.5 1.172 3749 PSO 78.5 75.9 2.312 3724 DE 79.8 78.1 0.733 2757 表 4 个体分段优化对比结果
Table 4. Comparison results of individual segment optimization
算法 最小化机群出动时间/min 收敛到最优值的
最小评价次数平均值平均值 最优值 方差 G-NSA 76.7 75.9 0.958 2940 G-NSA
(第一段编码)83.5 82.3 0.776 1833 G-NSA
(第二段编码)77.7 76.7 1.231 3900 -
[1] 刘翱, 刘克. 舰载机保障作业调度问题研究进展[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(1): 49-60.LIU A, LIU K. Advances in carrier-based aircraft deck operation scheduling[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(1): 49-60(in Chinese). [2] WU Y, HU N, QU X J. A general trajectory optimization method for aircraft taxiing on flight deck of carrier[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 233(4): 1340-1353. [3] LI Y T, WU Y, SU X C, et al. Path planning for aircraft fleet launching on the flight deck of carriers[J]. Mathematics, 2018, 6(10): 175. [4] 薛均晓, 孔祥燕, 郭毅博, 等. 基于深度强化学习的舰载机动态避障方法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2021, 33(7): 1102-1112.XUE J X, KONG X Y, GUO Y B, et al. Dynamic obstacle avoidance method for carrier aircraft based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2021, 33(7): 1102-1112(in Chinese). [5] 刘洁, 董献洲, 韩维, 等. 采用牛顿迭代保辛伪谱算法的舰载机甲板路径规划[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(9): 1827-1838.LIU J, DONG X Z, HAN W, et al. Trajectory planning for carrier aircraft on deck using Newton symplectic pseudo-spectral method[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(9): 1827-1838(in Chinese). [6] LIU J, HAN W, WANG X W, et al. Research on cooperative trajectory planning and tracking problem for multiple carrier aircraft on the deck[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(2): 3027-3038. [7] 刘洁, 韩维, 徐卫国, 等. 基于滚动时域的舰载机甲板运动轨迹跟踪最优控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 322842.LIU J, HAN W, XU W G, et al. Research on optimal path tracking control of carrier-based aircraft on the deck based on RHC[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 322842(in Chinese). [8] WANG X W, LI B, SU X C, et al. Autonomous dispatch trajectory planning on flight deck: a search-resampling-optimization framework[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 119: 105792. [9] 韩维, 刘子玄, 苏析超, 等. 结合启发式与最优控制的舰载机甲板路径规划算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1098-1110.HAN W, LIU Z X, SU X C, et al. Deck path planning algorithm of carrier-based aircraft based on heuristic and optimal control[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(4): 1098-1110(in Chinese). [10] 韩维, 崔荣伟, 苏析超, 等. 基于双种群模糊引力搜索算法的舰载机甲板作业调度[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(11): 2751-2759.HAN W, CUI R W, SU X C, et al. Flight deck operations scheduling based on dual population fuzzy gravitational search algorithm[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36(11): 2751-2759(in Chinese). [11] CUI R W, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A dual population multi-operator genetic algorithm for flight deck operations scheduling problem[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(2): 331-346. [12] 苏析超, 韩维, 张勇, 等. 考虑人机匹配模式的舰载机甲板机务勤务保障调度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 222314.SU X C, HAN W, ZHANG Y, et al. Scheduling algorithm for maintenance and service support of carrier-based aircraft on flight deck with different man-aircraft matching patterns[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 222314(in Chinese). [13] SU X C, CUI R W, LI C J, et al. A heuristic solution framework for the resource-constrained multi-aircraft scheduling problem with transfer of resources and aircraft[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 228: 120430. [14] 李亚飞, 高磊, 蒿宏杰, 等. 舰载机保障作业人机协同决策方法[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2023, 53(12): 2493-2510.LI Y F, GAO L, HAO H J, et al. Man-machine cooperative decision-making method for carrier-based aircraft support operation [J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2020, 53(12): 2493-2510(in Chinese). [15] 万兵, 苏析超, 郭放, 等. 不确定性工时下甲板作业的前摄性鲁棒调度[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 325971.WAN B, SU X C, GUO F, et al. Proactive robust scheduling of aircraft carrier flight deck operations with uncertain activity durations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 325971(in Chinese). [16] 曾斌, 陈媛媛, 李厚朴. 考虑保障装备可用度的舰载机作业调度优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1856-1865.ZENG B, CHEN Y Y, LI H P. Launch scheduling optimization considering availability of maintenance equipment for carrier aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1856-1865(in Chinese). [17] YUAN P L, XIAO W, LI Z Y, et al. A robust optimization scheduling for carrier aircraft support operation based on critical chain method[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 627(1): 012007. [18] SU X C, HAN W, WU Y, et al. A robust scheduling optimization method for flight deck operations of aircraft carrier with ternary interval durations[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 69918-69936. [19] SU X C, HAN W, WU Y, et al. A proactive robust scheduling method for aircraft carrier flight deck operations with stochastic durations[J]. Complexity, 2018, 2018: 6932985. [20] 范加利, 黄葵, 朱兴动, 等. 基于禁忌算法的舰载机甲板作业动态调度优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(10): 3172-3182.FAN J L, HUANG K, ZHU X D, et al. Carrier aircraft deck operations dynamic scheduling optimization algorithm based on the tabu algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(10): 3172-3182(in Chinese). [21] YUAN P L, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A dynamic scheduling method for carrier aircraft support operation under uncertain conditions based on rolling horizon strategy[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(9): 1546. [22] 刘珏, 王能建, 罗旭, 等. 采用改进遗传算法的舰载机保障调度方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42(2): 194-205.LIU J, WANG N J, LUO X, et al. Deck operation scheduling method of carrier-based aircraft based on improved genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42(2): 194-205(in Chinese). [23] 袁培龙, 韩维, 苏析超, 等. 不确定环境下舰载机保障预反应式动态调度优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1265-1277.YUAN P L, HAN W, SU X C, et al. Predictive-reactive dynamic scheduling strategy for carrier aircraft support in uncertain environment[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(6): 1265-1277(in Chinese). [24] LIU Z X, HAN W, WU Y, et al. Automated sortie scheduling optimization for fixed-wing unmanned carrier aircraft and unmanned carrier helicopter mixed fleet based on offshore platform[J]. Drones, 2022, 6(12): 375. [25] 刘子玄, 万兵, 苏析超, 等. 基于HA算法的舰载机出动作业调度方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(5): 1691-1702.LIU Z X, WAN B, SU X C, et al. Dispatching operation scheduling method of carrier-based aircraft based on HA algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(5): 1691-1702(in Chinese). [26] 刘玉杰, 崔凯凯, 韩维, 等. 基于IPSO的舰载机出动离场规划研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1337-1345.LIU Y J, CUI K K, HAN W, et al. Research on departure planning of carrier aircraft based on IPSO[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1337-1345(in Chinese). [27] LIU J, HAN W, LI J, et al. Integration design of sortie scheduling for carrier aircrafts based on hybrid flexible flowshop[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(1): 1503-1511. [28] 万兵, 韩维, 苏析超, 等. 基于CE-PF算法的舰载机离场调度优化问题[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 48(5): 771-785.WAN B, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A survey of carrier-based aircraft departure scheduling optimization problem based on CE-PF algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48(5): 771-785(in Chinese). [29] 万兵, 韩维, 梁勇, 等. 舰载机出动离场调度优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3624-3634.WAN B, HAN W, LIANG Y, et al. Optimization algorithm of carrier-based aircraft sortie departure scheduling[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3624-3634(in Chinese). [30] CUI J P, WU Y, SU X C, et al. A task allocation model for a team of aircraft launching on the carrier[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 7920806. [31] WU Y, WANG Y Y, QU X J, et al. Exploring mission planning method for a team of carrier aircraft launching[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1256-1267. [32] 郝桐, 黄斌, 何巍. 两栖攻击舰直升机出动回收流程分析[J]. 船舶工程, 2020, 42(5): 11-16.HAO T, HUANG B, HE W. Analysis of dispatch recovery process of helicopter on LHD[J]. Ship Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 11-16(in Chinese). [33] 李铭鑫. 基于UE4的舰载直升机机群调度优化及仿真研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2022: 21-34.LI M X. Research on scheduling optimization and simulation of shipborne helicopter fleet based on UE4[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2022: 21-34(in Chinese). [34] HAN W, WANG Y L, SU X C, et al. A multi-objective optimization problem research for amphibious operational mission of shipboard helicopters[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(9): 256-279. -


下载: