留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一维阵列多液滴蒸发模型及实验

韩琪炜 金捷 赖根鸿 黄俊琦 王方

韩琪炜,金捷,赖根鸿,等. 一维阵列多液滴蒸发模型及实验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1680-1690
引用本文: 韩琪炜,金捷,赖根鸿,等. 一维阵列多液滴蒸发模型及实验[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1680-1690
HAN Q W,JIN J,LAI G H,et al. Experimental study of multi-droplet evaporation model of one-dimensional array[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1680-1690 (in Chinese)
Citation: HAN Q W,JIN J,LAI G H,et al. Experimental study of multi-droplet evaporation model of one-dimensional array[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1680-1690 (in Chinese)

一维阵列多液滴蒸发模型及实验

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0138
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(20232ACB204026,12172345,92041001)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:fwang@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V231.2.3

Experimental study of multi-droplet evaporation model of one-dimensional array

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (20232ACB204026,12172345,92041001)

More Information
  • 摘要:

    在航空发动机燃烧室内,燃料液滴群蒸发时往往受液滴间相互作用影响,然而单液滴蒸发特性难以表征液滴群蒸发状态,因此,需要进行多液滴蒸发实验,探究多液滴蒸发机理。搭建实验平台,采用挂滴法开展航空煤油/甘油的双液滴和直线排列三液滴蒸发实验,结合液滴蒸发理论和实验数据,建立液滴蒸发模型。结果表明:多液滴蒸发速率随着液滴间距增长而上升,趋近于单液滴蒸发速率,蒸发速率和液滴间距呈指数关系,模型整体精度较高。实验所得实验数据和提出的液滴蒸发模型,有效补充了多液滴蒸发特性的研究内容,并对液滴群蒸发特性的研究和航空发动机燃烧室的设计有着积极的意义。

     

  • 图 1  蒸发实验平台

    Figure 1.  Evaporation experimental platform

    图 2  直线排列3液滴

    Figure 2.  Three droplets in a straight line

    图 3  数据处理方法

    Figure 3.  Data processing method

    图 4  液滴初始直径误差

    Figure 4.  Initial droplet diameter error

    图 5  单滴正庚烷蒸发

    Figure 5.  A single drop of n-heptane evaporation

    图 6  蒸发速率和温度关系图

    Figure 6.  Evaporation rate and temperature diagram

    图 7  400 ℃甘油双液滴蒸发

    Figure 7.  Glycerol double droplets evaporation at 400 ℃

    图 8  400 ℃甘油3液滴蒸发

    Figure 8.  Evaporation of glycerol triacylglycerol three-droplets at 400 ℃

    图 9  ηs/d0的关系图

    Figure 9.  Relationship diagram between η and s/d0

    图 10  实验数据和拟合曲线

    Figure 10.  Experimental data and fitting curves

    图 11  实验数据和拟合曲线

    Figure 11.  Experimental data and fitting curves

    图 12  表4中公式相对误差

    Figure 12.  Relative error of the formula of table 4

    表  1  加权因子w

    Table  1.   Weighting factor w

    排列方式 影响→被影响液滴 加权因子
    2液滴 1
    3液滴 边滴→中滴 1/2
    边滴→边滴 1/3
    中滴→边滴 2/3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2液滴蒸发拟合公式和拟合优度

    Table  2.   Two-droplet evaporation fitting formula and goodness-of-fit

    组分 温度/℃ 拟合公式 拟合优度R2
    航空煤油 400 f(x)= 1.000733− 0.000733e 6.8439/x 0.97870
    500 f(x)= 1.00204− 0.00204e 5.4340/x 0.98869
    600 f(x)= 1.00642− 0.00642e 3.7501/x 0.99491
    甘油 400 f(x)= 1.00243− 0.00243e 5.8955/x 0.99614
    500 f(x)= 1.00506− 0.00506e 4.7616/x 0.98804
    600 f(x)= 1.00838− 0.00838e 3.8144/x 0.98553
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  3液滴蒸发拟合公式和拟合优度

    Table  3.   Three-droplet evaporation fitting formula and goodness-of-fit

    蒸发条件 拟合公式 拟合优度R2
    400 ℃甘油边滴 f(x)= 1.002530.00253e 6.95977/x 0.99620
    400 ℃甘油中滴 f(x)= 1.002370.00237e 6.29522/x 0.99181
    600 ℃甘油边滴 f(x)=1.006−0.006e 4.67651/x 0.98643
    600 ℃甘油中滴 f(x)= 1.007850.00785e 5.06098/x 0.99028
    400 ℃航空煤油边滴 f(x)= 1.0009350.000935e 7.99669/x 0.99557
    400 ℃航空煤油中滴 f(x)= 1.001080.00108e 6.78782/x 0.98773
    600 ℃航空煤油边滴 f(x)= 1.006010.00601e 5.14685/x 0.98546
    600 ℃航空煤油中滴 f(x)= 1.005310.00531e 4.38485/x 0.97102
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  公式和低误差率

    Table  4.   formulas and low error rates

    蒸发条件 推导公式 低误差率/%
    400 ℃甘油边滴 f(x)= 1.00109950.000733e 6.8439/x0.0003665e 6.8439/(2x) 96.5
    400 ℃甘油中滴 f(x)= 1.004860.00486e 5.8955/x 99.1
    600 ℃甘油边滴 f(x)= 1.0036450.00243e 5.8955/x0.001215e 5.8955/(2x) 97.6
    600 ℃甘油中滴 f(x)= 1.016760.01676e 3.8144/x 98.2
    400 ℃航空煤油边滴 f(x)= 1.012570.00838e 3.8144/x0.00419e 3.8144/(2x) 95.0
    400 ℃航空煤油中滴 f(x)= 1.0017660.001766e 6.8439/x 96.2
    600 ℃航空煤油边滴 f(x)= 1.009630.00642e 3.7501/x0.00321e 3.7501/(2x) 98.9
    600 ℃航空煤油中滴 f(x)= 1.012840.01284e 3.7501/x 97.8
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 郑晓峰, 冯耀勋, 贾明生. 富氧燃烧的节能特性及其对环境的影响[J]. 节能, 2006, 25(7): 26-28.

    ZHENG X F, FENG Y X, JIA M S. Environmental influence and energy-saving characteristic of oxygen-enriched combustion[J]. Energy Conservation, 2006, 25(7): 26-28 (in Chinese).
    [2] JIANG X, SIAMAS G A, JAGUS K, et al. Physical modelling and advanced simulations of gas–liquid two-phase jet flows in atomization and sprays[J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(2): 131-167.
    [3] GODSAVE G A E. Studies of the combustion of drops in a fuel spray: the burning of single drops of fuel[J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1953, 4(1): 818-830.
    [4] SPALDING D B. Combustion of liquid fuels[J]. Nature, 1950, 165(4187): 160.
    [5] LAW C K. Unsteady droplet combustion with droplet heating[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1976, 26: 17-22.
    [6] LAW C K, SIRIGNANO W A. Unsteady droplet combustion with droplet heating: II: Conduction limit[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1977, 28: 175-186.
    [7] PRAKASH S, SIRIGNANO W A. Theory of convective droplet vaporization with unsteady heat transfer in the circulating liquid phase[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1980, 23(3): 253-268.
    [8] PRAKASH S, SIRIGNANO W A. Liquid fuel droplet heating with internal circulation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1978, 21(7): 885-895.
    [9] RANZ W E, MARSHALL W R. Evaporation from drops[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48(173): 141-146.
    [10] ABRAMZON B, SIRIGNANO W A. Droplet vaporization model for spray combustion calculations[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1989, 32(9): 1605-1618.
    [11] WANG F, LIU R, LI M, et al. Kerosene evaporation rate in high temperature air stationary and convective environment[J]. Fuel, 2018, 211: 582-590.
    [12] BRZUSTOWSKI T A, TWARDUS E M, WOJCICKI S, et al. Interaction of two burning fuel droplets of arbitrary size[J]. AIAA Journal, 1979, 17(11): 1234-1242.
    [13] MIN J L, BAO J R, CHEN W, et al. Numerical simulation of liquid hydrogen droplets “group” evaporation and combustion[J]. Cryogenics, 2020, 108: 103091.
    [14] JIANG T L, CHIANG W T. Effects of multiple droplet interaction on droplet vaporization in subcritical and supercritical pressure environments[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1994, 97(1): 17-34.
    [15] WRAY A W, DUFFY B R, WILSON S K. Competitive evaporation of multiple sessile droplets[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2020, 884: A45.
    [16] LIU Q Z, LU R B, QIAO Y L, et al. Analysis of the correction factors and coupling characteristics of multi-droplet evaporation[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 195: 123138.
    [17] KHILIFI D, FOUDHIL W, FAHEM K, et al. Study of the phenomenon of the interaction between sessile drops during evaporation[J]. Thermal Science, 2019, 23(2 Part B): 1105-1114.
    [18] BALAKRISHNAN P, SUNDARARAJAN T, NATARAJAN R. Interference effects during burning of tandem porous spheres in mixed convective environment[J]. AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(10): 1889-1898.
    [19] ELKOTB M M, ALY S L, ELSALMAWY H A. Evaporation characteristics of fuel and multifuel droplets[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1991, 85(3-4): 300-308.
    [20] MAQUA C, CASTANET G, GRISCH F, et al. Monodisperse droplet heating and evaporation: Experimental study and modelling[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2008, 51(15-16): 3932-3945.
    [21] JAVED I, BAEK S W, WAHEED K. Evaporation characteristics of heptane droplets with the addition of aluminum nanoparticles at elevated temperatures[J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(1): 170-183.
    [22] DENG H W, ZHANG C B, XU G Q, et al. Density measurements of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel at sub-and supercritical conditions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2011, 56(6): 2980-2986.
    [23] DENG H W, ZHANG C B, XU G Q, et al. Viscosity measurements of endothermic hydrocarbon fuel from (298 to 788) K under supercritical pressure conditions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2012, 57(2): 358-365.
    [24] DENG H W, ZHU K, XU G Q, et al. Isobaric specific heat capacity measurement for kerosene RP-3 in the near-critical and supercritical regions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2012, 57(2): 263-268.
    [25] XU G Q, JIA Z X, WEN J, et al. Thermal-conductivity measurements of aviation kerosene RP-3 from (285 to 513)K at sub- and supercritical pressures[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2015, 36(4): 620-632.
    [26] 张志强, 郝毓雅, 陈战斌. 航空喷气燃料RP-3运动粘度特性研究[J]. 现代机械, 2020(1): 38-40.

    ZHANG Z Q, HAO Y Y, CHEN Z B. Kinematic viscosity characteristics of aviation jet fuel RP-3[J]. Modern Machinery, 2020(1): 38-40 (in Chinese).
    [27] 周力行. 燃烧理论和化学流体力学[M]. 北京: 科学普及出版社, 1986.

    ZHOU L X. Combustion theory and chemical fluid mechanics[M]. Beijing: Popular Science Press, 1986 (in Chinese).
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  323
  • HTML全文浏览量:  85
  • PDF下载量:  3
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-03-11
  • 录用日期:  2024-04-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-05-06
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-05-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答