留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于多种微结构的机翼结构/材料多尺度气动弹性优化

黎珂宇 杨超 王晓喆 万志强 李畅

黎珂宇,杨超,王晓喆,等. 基于多种微结构的机翼结构/材料多尺度气动弹性优化[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1635-1646
引用本文: 黎珂宇,杨超,王晓喆,等. 基于多种微结构的机翼结构/材料多尺度气动弹性优化[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(5):1635-1646
LI K Y,YANG C,WANG X Z,et al. Aeroelastic optimization of wing structure and material using multiple microstructures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1635-1646 (in Chinese)
Citation: LI K Y,YANG C,WANG X Z,et al. Aeroelastic optimization of wing structure and material using multiple microstructures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(5):1635-1646 (in Chinese)

基于多种微结构的机翼结构/材料多尺度气动弹性优化

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0178
基金项目: 

航空科学基金(2022Z012051001)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:wangxiaozhemvp@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V224

Aeroelastic optimization of wing structure and material using multiple microstructures

Funds: 

Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2022Z012051001)

More Information
  • 摘要:

    微结构材料具有质量轻、功能多的特点,在航空航天领域具有广阔的应用前景。然而,单种微结构材料的刚度特性无法适应飞机进一步的减重要求。基于此,针对大展弦比机翼的宏/微结构构型,提出一种基于多种微结构构型的机翼结构和材料的多尺度气动弹性优化方法。由均匀化方法等效微结构材料的力学特性,结合宏观结构单元密度,计算整体刚度,通过求解气动弹性平衡方程获得弹性气动力及位移,基于敏度信息实现机翼结构和材料的协同设计。优化结果表明:在相同载荷下,基于多种微结构材料的整体结构柔顺度较单种微结构材料减小了18.6%。与刚性气动力下的优化结果相比,机翼弹性效应对微结构拓扑构型影响较小,而宏观结构的外段被加强。所提方法可有效优化复杂边界条件下的机翼结构,实现机翼内合理的刚度分布。

     

  • 图 1  多尺度气动弹性优化框架

    Figure 1.  Framework of multiscale aeroelastic optimization

    图 2  无人机机翼模型

    Figure 2.  Unmanned aerial vehicle wing model

    图 3  微结构材料分布

    Figure 3.  Distribution of microstructured materials

    图 4  目标函数和体积约束收敛

    Figure 4.  Convergence of the objective functions and volume constraints

    图 5  优化宏观结构拓扑

    Figure 5.  Macrostructural topology of optimization

    图 6  后处理的宏观结构拓扑

    Figure 6.  Macrostructural topology of post-processing

    图 7  单种微结构优化拓扑

    Figure 7.  Optimization topology for a single microstructure

    图 8  多种微结构优化拓扑

    Figure 8.  Optimization topology for multiple microstructure

    图 9  展向位置的最优多尺度设计

    Figure 9.  Optimal multiscale design of span position

    图 10  机翼的飞行载荷分布

    Figure 10.  Flight load distribution of the wing

    图 11  机翼的气动力分布

    Figure 11.  Aerodynamic load distribution of the wing

    图 12  刚性和弹性气动力下宏观结构拓扑

    Figure 12.  Macrostructural topology under rigid loading and elastic aerodynamic loads

    图 13  不同展向位置单元体积对总体积的百分比

    Figure 13.  Ratio of percentage of element volume to total volume at different spanwise stations

    图 14  刚性气动力下的微结构拓扑

    Figure 14.  Microstructural topology under rigid aerodynamic load

    图 15  弹性气动力下的微结构拓扑

    Figure 15.  Microstructural topology under elastic aerodynamic load

    表  1  优化及后处理结果

    Table  1.   Optimization and post-processing results

    结构 单种微结构
    柔顺度/J
    多种微结构
    柔顺度/J
    最优结构 762 620
    后处理结构 847 667
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] COMPTON B G, LEWIS J A. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites[J]. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(34): 5930-5935.
    [2] ZHENG X Y, LEE H, WEISGRABER T H, et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials[J]. Science, 2014, 344(6190): 1373-1377.
    [3] 倪维宇, 张横, 姚胜卫. 考虑阻尼性能的复合结构多尺度拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 332-342.

    NI W Y, ZHANG H, YAO S W. Concurrent topology optimization of composite structures for considering structural damping[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(3): 332-342(in Chinese).
    [4] JENETT B, CALISCH S, CELLUCCI D, et al. Digital morphing wing: active wing shaping concept using composite lattice-based cellular structures[J]. Soft Robotics, 2017, 4(1): 33-48.
    [5] CRAMER N B, CELLUCCI D W, FORMOSO O B, et al. Elastic shape morphing of ultralight structures by programmable assembly[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2019, 28(5): 055006.
    [6] CRAMER N B, KIM J, JENETT B, et al. Simulated scalability of discrete lattice materials substructures to commercial scale aircraft[C]//AIAA Aviation 2020 Forum. Reston: AIAA, 2020: 2656.
    [7] WANG C, ZHU J H, WU M Q, et al. Multi-scale design and optimization for solid-lattice hybrid structures and their application to aerospace vehicle components[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(5): 386-398.
    [8] WANG X Z, ZHANG S S, WAN Z Q, et al. Aeroelastic topology optimization of wing structure based on moving boundary meshfree method[J]. Symmetry, 2022, 14(6): 1154.
    [9] OTOMORI M, YAMADA T, IZUI K, et al. Matlab code for a level set-based topology optimization method using a reaction diffusion equation[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2015, 51(5): 1159-1172.
    [10] WANG S Y, WANG M Y. Radial basis functions and level set method for structural topology optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 65(12): 2060-2090.
    [11] XIE Y M, STEVEN G P. A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization[J]. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885-896.
    [12] XIA L, XIA Q, HUANG X D, et al. Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization on advanced structures and materials: a comprehensive review[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2018, 25(2): 437-478.
    [13] BENDSØE M P, SIGMUND O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization[J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 1999, 69(9): 635-654.
    [14] 闫浩, 吴晓明. 载荷敏度抑制下涡轮盘拓扑优化及结构演化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 339-348.

    YAN H, WU X M. Topology optimization and structure evolution of turbine disks based on load sensitivity suppression[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 339-348(in Chinese).
    [15] RODRIGUES H, GUEDES J M, BENDSOE M P. Hierarchical optimization of material and structure[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(1): 1-10.
    [16] GAO J, LUO Z, XIA L, et al. Concurrent topology optimization of multiscale composite structures in Matlab[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 60(6): 2621-2651.
    [17] WANG C, ZHU J H, ZHANG W H, et al. Concurrent topology optimization design of structures and non-uniform parameterized lattice microstructures[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(1): 35-50.
    [18] ZHANG Y, LI H, XIAO M, et al. Concurrent topology optimization for cellular structures with nonuniform microstructures based on the Kriging metamodel[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59(4): 1273-1299.
    [19] LI K Y, YANG C, WANG X Z, et al. Multiscale aeroelastic optimization method for wing structure and material[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(10): 866.
    [20] HASSANI B, HINTON E. A review of homogenization and topology optimization I: homogenization theory for media with periodic structure[J]. Computers & Structures, 1998, 69(6): 707-717.
    [21] XIA Z H, ZHOU C W, YONG Q L, et al. On selection of repeated unit cell model and application of unified periodic boundary conditions in micro-mechanical analysis of composites[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(2): 266-278.
    [22] MEI Y L, WANG X M. A level set method for structural topology optimization and its applications[J]. Advances in Engineering Software, 2004, 35(7): 415-441.
    [23] WENDLAND H. Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree[J]. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 1995, 4(1): 389-396.
    [24] LUO Z, TONG L Y, KANG Z. A level set method for structural shape and topology optimization using radial basis functions[J]. Computers & Structures, 2009, 87(7-8): 425-434.
    [25] KIM N H, DONG T, WEINBERG D, et al. Generalized optimality criteria method for topology optimization[J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11(7): 3175.
  • 加载中
图(15) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  501
  • HTML全文浏览量:  228
  • PDF下载量:  8
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-03-27
  • 录用日期:  2024-06-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-06-21
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-05-26

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答