留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

强阵风下大柔性机翼的非线性流固耦合响应分析

苏进鑫 席梓严 戴玉婷

苏进鑫,席梓严,戴玉婷. 强阵风下大柔性机翼的非线性流固耦合响应分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(6):2172-2183
引用本文: 苏进鑫,席梓严,戴玉婷. 强阵风下大柔性机翼的非线性流固耦合响应分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(6):2172-2183
SU J X,XI Z Y,DAI Y T. Nonlinear fluid-structure interaction response analysis of a large flexible wing under strong gusts[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(6):2172-2183 (in Chinese)
Citation: SU J X,XI Z Y,DAI Y T. Nonlinear fluid-structure interaction response analysis of a large flexible wing under strong gusts[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(6):2172-2183 (in Chinese)

强阵风下大柔性机翼的非线性流固耦合响应分析

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0278
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:yutingdai@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: V221+.3;TB553

Nonlinear fluid-structure interaction response analysis of a large flexible wing under strong gusts

More Information
  • 摘要:

    大柔性机翼在较大阵风来流下会产生显著变形,其中,几何非线性和气动非线性不可忽略。为研究大柔性机翼在强阵风下的响应,建立了基于几何非线性梁理论与计算流体力学(CFD)方法的流固耦合分析方法。通过对比倒置柔性板风洞试验,验证了该流固耦合仿真的准确性。在此基础上,建立了半展弦比为9的大柔性机翼流体模型和几何非线性梁模型,在雷诺数为105的条件下,对其进行阵风响应计算,研究了不同阵风比下(RG=0.1~0.4)大柔性机翼的动响应特性,特别是对大阵风比(RG=0.4)时阵风诱导的机翼动态失速气动特性进行分析。研究结果表明:随着阵风比的增大,机翼出现了显著的非线性弯曲变形,在RG=0.4时,机翼的最大弯曲变形达63%半展长,同时,机翼的弯曲变形使前缘涡(LEV)的展向分布宽度减小,影响了气动力的分布,降低了阵风载荷。

     

  • 图 1  3D梁单元广义坐标

    Figure 1.  Generalized coordinates of 3D beam element

    图 2  CFD/CSD弱耦合仿真流程

    Figure 2.  CFD/CSD weak coupling simulation process

    图 3  倒置柔性板有限元模型

    Figure 3.  Finite element model of the inverted flexible plate

    图 4  流域及网格

    Figure 4.  Flow field and mesh

    图 5  U=4.2 m/s时仿真与实验位移对比

    Figure 5.  Comparison of simulation and experimental displacements at U=4.2 m/s

    图 6  t=0.77 s时流场网格变形示意

    Figure 6.  Schematic of flow field grid deformation at t=0.77 s

    图 7  不同来流速度下倒置柔性板自由端位移曲线

    Figure 7.  Displacement curves of free end of an inverted flexible plate under different incoming flow velocities

    图 8  仿真所得不同流速下倒置柔性板动态轮廓叠加

    Figure 8.  Dynamic contour superposition of an inverted flexible plate under different flow velocities obtained from simulation

    图 9  阵风模型

    Figure 9.  Gust model

    图 10  机翼几何模型

    Figure 10.  Geometrical model of the wing

    图 11  机翼前四阶模态振型

    Figure 11.  The first four modes shape of the wing

    图 12  机翼前景网格

    Figure 12.  Foreground grid around the wing

    图 13  背景网格及流场域

    Figure 13.  Background grid and flow field

    图 14  网格和时间步长收敛性曲线

    Figure 14.  Grid and time-step convergence curves

    图 15  工况1、2升力曲线对比

    Figure 15.  Comparison of lift curves for case 1 and case 2

    图 16  工况2动响应结果

    Figure 16.  Dynamic response results for case 2

    图 17  翼尖扭转角度示意

    Figure 17.  Schematic of wingtip twist angle

    图 18  工况2下不同时刻压力云图及变形

    Figure 18.  Pressure contours and deformation at different moments under case 2

    图 19  工况1、2截面升力时空分布

    Figure 19.  Spatiotemporal distributions of the sectional lift for case 1 and case 2

    图 20  C时刻机翼升力沿展向变化趋势及上表面压力分布

    Figure 20.  Trend of wing lift along the spreading direction and pressure distribution on the upper surface at the moment C

    图 21  不同时刻机翼周围的Q准则等值面(Q = 2 000)

    Figure 21.  The Q-criterion iso-surfaces around the wing at different time (Q = 2 000)

    图 22  工况3、4升力曲线对比

    Figure 22.  Comparison of lift curves for case 3 and case 4

    图 23  工况4动响应结果

    Figure 23.  Dynamic response results for case 4

    图 24  工况4下不同时刻压力云图及变形

    Figure 24.  Pressure contours and deformation at different moments under case 4

    图 25  工况3、4截面升力时空分布

    Figure 25.  Spatiotemporal distributions of the sectional lift for case 3 and case 4

    图 26  不同时刻机翼周围的 Q 准则等值面(Q = 5 000)

    Figure 26.  The Q-criterion iso-surfaces around the wing at different time (Q = 5 000)

    图 27  c时刻机翼升力沿展向变化趋势及上表面压力分布

    Figure 27.  Trend of wing lift along the spreading direction and pressure distribution on the upper surface at the moment c

    表  1  时间和空间离散方案

    Table  1.   Time and space discrete schemes

    设置项目方案
    瞬态一阶隐式
    梯度基于单元的最小二乘法
    压力二阶
    动量二阶迎风
    湍动能二阶迎风
    比耗散率二阶迎风
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  倒置柔性板参数

    Table  2.   Parameters of inverted flexible plate

    弹性模量/GPa 泊松比 密度/(kg·m−3 板长/m 板宽/m 板厚/m
    2.38 0.38 1200 0.27 0.3 0.0008
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  机翼材料属性

    Table  3.   Material properties of the wing

    结构密度/(kg·m−3)弹性模量/GPa泊松比
    柔性体翼梁5 800193.10.38
    刚体翼肋7 125
    刚体翼尖配重6 525
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  前四阶模态频率

    Table  4.   Frequency of the first four modes

    模态阶数模态描述模态频率/Hz
    机翼面外一弯2.46
    机翼面外二弯19.54
    机翼面内一弯23.87
    机翼一扭38.21
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  网格参数

    Table  5.   Parameters of the mesh

    网格名称 背景网格
    数量
    前景网格
    数量
    壁面距离 网格增长率
    粗网格 862 580 294 524 1.5 1.23
    中等网格 862 580 355 460 1.0 1.20
    细网格 862 580 457 020 0.5 1.17
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  仿真工况参数

    Table  6.   Simulated operating conditions parameters

    工况编号机翼刚柔性机翼迎角/(°)阵风速度幅值/
    (m·s−1)
    RG阵风频率/Hz
    1刚性02.50.13
    2柔性02.50.13
    3刚性0100.43
    4柔性0100.43
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] HU P, TANG Y, HAN Y, et al. Numerical study on self-excited forces and flow fields for a thin plate under a sinusoidal non-stationary wind condition[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(6): 063602.
    [2] BADRYA C, BILER H, JONES A R, et al. Effect of gust width on flat-plate response in large transverse gust[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(1): 49-64.
    [3] CORKERY S J, BABINSKY H, HARVEY J K. On the development and early observations from a towing tank-based transverse wing-gust encounter test rig[J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2018, 59(9): 135.
    [4] TANG D, DOWELL E H. Experimental and theoretical study of gust response for high-aspect-ratio wing[J]. AIAA Journal, 2002, 40: 419-429.
    [5] NEUMANN J, MAI H. Gust response: simulation of an aeroelastic experiment by a fluid-structure interaction method[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2013, 38: 290-302.
    [6] AN C, YANG C, XIE C C, et al. Flutter and gust response analysis of a wing model including geometric nonlinearities based on a modified structural ROM[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(1): 48-63.
    [7] ZHENG Y, DAI Y T, YANG C, et al. Effect of wingtip bending morphing on gust-induced aerodynamics based on fluid-structure interaction method[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(11): 115124.
    [8] 陈利丽, 宋笔锋, 宋文萍, 等. 柔性扑翼气动结构耦合特性数值研究[J]. 空气动力学学报, 2015, 33(1): 125-133.

    CHEN L L, SONG B F, SONG W P, et al. Numerical aerodynamic-structural coupling research for flexible flapping wing[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 125-133(in Chinese).
    [9] MIAN H H, WANG G, YE Z Y. Numerical investigation of structural geometric nonlinearity effect in high-aspect-ratio wing using CFD/CSD coupled approach[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 49: 186-201.
    [10] 聂雪媛, 黄程德, 杨国伟. 基于CFD/CSD耦合的结构几何非线性静气动弹性数值方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(8): 48-53.

    NIE X Y, HUANG C D, YANG G W. Numerical analysis for aeroelastic with structural geometrical nonlinearity using a CFD/CSD-coupled method[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(8): 48-53(in Chinese).
    [11] 吴金洋, 吴光辉, 魏小辉, 等. 临近空间太阳能飞行器着陆状态阵风响应[J]. 海军航空大学学报, 2024, 39(1): 153-158.

    WU J Y, WU G H, WEI X H, et al. Gust Loads in the landing state of solar-powered aircraft in near space[J]. Journal of Naval Aviation University, 2024, 39(1): 153-158(in Chinese).
    [12] SIMO J C. A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1985, 49(1): 55-70.
    [13] SIMO J C, VU-QUOC L. A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: computational aspects[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1986, 58(1): 79-116.
    [14] REN H. A computationally efficient and robust geometrically-exact curved beam formulation for multibody systems[C]//Proceedings of the 7th Asian Conference on Multibody Dynamics. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 285-296.
    [15] REN H, KHUDE N, ORTIZ J, et al. A shear-locking free model of Timoshenko beams with large deformation and large rotation[C]//Proceedings of the ECCOMAS Thematic Conference. Berlin: Springer, 2013: 457-468.
    [16] Hexagon AB. Adams 2020: Adams FE Part User's Guide[EB/OL]. [2024-02-10]. https://nexus.hexagon.com/documentationcenter/en-US/bundle/Adams_2020_Adams_FE_Part_User_Guide/resource/Adams_2020_Adams_FE_Part_User_Guide.pdf
    [17] MENTER F R. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8): 1598-1605.
    [18] BOOKSTEIN F L. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1989, 11(6): 567-585.
    [19] KIM D, COSSÉ J, CERDEIRA C H, et al. Flapping dynamics of an inverted flag[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2013, 736: R1.
    [20] LEE Y L, BAEDER J D. Implicit hole cutting-A new approach to overset grid connectivity: AIAA-2003-4128[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
    [21] JEONG J, HUSSAIN F. On the identification of a vortex[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 285: 69-94.
  • 加载中
图(27) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  265
  • HTML全文浏览量:  119
  • PDF下载量:  23
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-05-06
  • 录用日期:  2024-08-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-11-27
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答