New method to evaluate crew workload and application
-
摘要: 评估机组工作负荷是适航审核的重要指标之一,FAA(Federal Aviation Administration)适航标准CFR-25.1523和中国适航标准CCAR-25.1523中都对机组工作负荷的审核提出了要求.研究了适航标准、波音737和空客320机组操作手册及其他相关文献,通过与飞行员面谈建立评价体系基本框架.应用德尔菲法进行咨询确定评价体系指标,应用序关系分析法进行指标权重系数调查,最终建立机组工作负荷综合评价体系.基于所建立的评价体系,应用模糊综合评价法对B737和A320机组工作负荷进行了综合评价,评价结果表明:研究所建立的民机机组工作负荷评价体系合理,具有实用性.所获得的机组工作负荷评估体系及评价结果可为C919等同类机型的机组工作负荷设计提供参考.Abstract: Crew workload assessment is an important index of airworthiness certification.Wokload assessment is required by both CFR-25.1523 of federal aviation administration(FAA) airworthiness certification and CCAR-25.1523 of Chinese airworthiness certification. The basic frame of evaluation index system was established by studying airworthiness certification, crew operation manual of Boeing 737 and Airbus 320, other correlated references and interviewing with pilots. The crew workload comprehensive evaluation index system was established by consultation with Delphi method, and index weight coefficients questionnaire with order relation analysis method. The crew workload of Boeing 737 and Airbus 320 was evaluated with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on the built evaluation index. The result shows that this index is reasonable and practicable. The evaluation index system and evaluation results can provide design reference on crew workload for C919.
-
Key words:
- crew workload /
- evaluation index /
- weight coefficients /
- fuzzy comprehensive evaluation /
- airworthiness
-
[1] Federal aviation administration.Minimum flight crew[R].AC 25.1523-1,2005 [2] Roscoe A H.Assessing pilot workload.Why measure heart rate,HRV and respirootion [J].Biological Psychology,1992,34(2/3):259-287 [3] Williges R C,Wierwille W W.Behavioral measures of aircrew mental workload[J].Human Factors,1979,21:549-574 [4] CCAR-25-R3 中国民用航空规章第25部运输类飞机适航标准[S]
CCAR-25-R3 Civil aviation regulations part 25 airworthiness standards:transport category airplanes[S](in Chinese)[5] The boeing company.Boeing 737 flight crew training manual[R].FCT 737 (TM),2006 [6] The airbus company.A318/A319/A320/A321 flight crew operating manual[R].Fcom Rev041E,2008 [7] 《飞机设计手册》总编委会.飞机设计手册[M].北京:航空工业出版社,2001
General editions of aircraft design manual.Aircraft design manual [M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press,2001(in Chinese)[8] Obsborne j,Collins S,Ratcliffe M,et al.What "ideas-about-science" schould be taught in school science A delphi study of the expert community[J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching,2003,40(7):692-720 [9] 郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007
Guo Yajun.Comprehensive evaluation theory method and application[M].Beijing:Science Press,2007(in Chinese)[10] 荩垆.实用模糊数学[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1989
Jin Lu.Practical fuzzy math [M].Beijing:Science and Technology Document Press,1989(in Chinese)[11] 王黎静,郭奋飞,何雪丽,等.大型客机飞行员操作程序综合评价,北京航空航天大学学报,2010,36(11):1436-1439
Wang Lijing,Guo Fenfei,He Xueli,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of pilot operation procedures for commercial airliner[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2010,36(11):1436-1439(in Chinese) 期刊类型引用(8)
1. 吴鹏,穆荣军,邓雁鹏,崔乃刚. 月球探测器鲁棒环形山检测及光学导航方法. 哈尔滨工程大学学报. 2024(02): 238-246 . 百度学术
2. 刘晓慧,刘世瑛,刘少然,王镓,钱雪茹. 基于阴影特征的月面凹障碍自动识别检测方法. 深空探测学报(中英文). 2023(06): 659-666 . 百度学术
3. 熊月容,康志伟. 基于快照集成卷积神经网络的陨石坑图像分类识别. 中国科技论文在线精品论文. 2022(01): 104-111 . 百度学术
4. 肖扬,李帅,王光泽,邵巍,姚文龙. 小天体导航陆标深度学习预测框匹配算法. 深空探测学报(中英文). 2022(04): 400-406 . 百度学术
5. 钱洲元,贺亮,张瀚墨,胡阳修,曹涛. 基于灰度特征与几何约束的月面陨石坑自动提取方法. 载人航天. 2021(02): 158-168 . 百度学术
6. 王光泽,邵巍,郗洪良,姚文龙,黄翔宇. 小天体表面纹理曲线精准匹配算法. 深空探测学报(中英文). 2021(03): 306-314 . 百度学术
7. 花玮,顾梅花,李立瑶,崔琳. 改进SOLOv2的服装图像分割算法. 纺织高校基础科学学报. 2021(04): 74-81 . 百度学术
8. 胡涛,贺亮,曹涛,韩宇,张翰墨. 行星陨石坑检测算法研究综述. 载人航天. 2020(05): 656-663 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(11)
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 2758
- HTML全文浏览量: 271
- PDF下载量: 554
- 被引次数: 19