基于代理模型的高超声速飞行器协同优化设计

马树微; 杜斌; 陈万春

基于代理模型的高超声速飞行器协同优化设计

北京航空航天大学宇航学院, 北京 100191

基金项目: 航天支撑技术基金资助项目(2011115155)

详细信息

中图分类号: V211.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 1667
- HTML全文浏览量: 245
- PDF下载量: 550
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-01-22
- 修回日期: 2013-08-08
- 网络出版日期: 2013-08-30

Collaborative optimization of hypersonic vehicle based on surrogate model

School of Astronautics, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 建立了类X-51A高超声速飞行器的多学科模型,包括外形、气动、推进、质量、热流、弹道等学科.采用多学科设计优化(MDO, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization)方法中的协同优化(CO, Collaborative Optimization)进行了计算,计算流程中构建了两个子系统优化器与弹道学科的代理模型,使用代理模型替代了计算耗时的真实模型.同时为了对比,采用了多学科可行法(MDF, Multidisciplinary Feasible Method)进行了优化计算.结果表明,二者的优化结果基本一致,优化之后的飞行器质量比初始构型飞行器降低了15.2%,航程提升了63.5%,并且使用代理模型后计算效率也得到了很大的提升.验证了基于代理模型的协同优化方法应用于高超声速飞行器设计中的有效性.
- 高超声速飞行器 /
- 多学科设计优化 /
- 协同优化 /
- 代理模型
Abstract: The multidisciplinary models of hypersonic vehicle which similar to the X-51A were built, including configuration, aerodynamics, propulsion, mass, heat and trajectory. The collaborative optimization (CO) method which is one of the multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) method was used, the surrogate models of two subsystem optimizers and trajectory model were built to replace the real models which are time-consuming in the process. Meanwhile, multidisciplinary feasible (MDF) method was used to calculate for comparison. The results show that both the optimization results are basically the same, the mass of the vehicle is 15.2% lower and the range is 63.5% higher than the initial vehicle after optimization,and the computational efficiency has also been greatly improved by using the surrogate models. The validity of the CO based on surrogate model applying to hypersonic vehicle design is verified.
- hypersonic vehicle /
- multidisciplinary design optimization /
- collaborative optimization /
- surrogate model

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] Bowcutt K G.Multidisciplinary optimization of airbreathing hypersonic vehicles[J].Journal of Propulsion and Power,2001,17(6) :1184-1190 [2] Tsuchiya T,Takenaka Y,Taguchi H.Multidisciplinary design optimization for hypersonic experimental vehicle[J].AIAA Journal,2007,45(7):1655-1662 [3] 车竞,王文正,何开锋.高超声速飞行器并行子空间优化设计[J].航空动力学报,2010,25(4):912-917 Che Jing,Wang Wanzheng,He Kaifeng.Concurrent subspace optimization design of hypersonic cruise vehicle[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2010,25(4):912-917(in Chinese) [4] Kroo I,Altus S,Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J,et al.Multidisciplinary optimization methods for aircraft preliminary design[R].AIAA 94-4235,1994 [5] 李响,李为吉.利用协同优化方法实现复杂系统的分解并行设计优化[J].宇航学报,2004,25(3):300-304 Li Xiang,Li Weiji.A new collaborative optimization algorithm and its applications to complex system parallel design[J].Journal of Astronautics,2004,25(3):300-304(in Chinese) [6] 穆雪峰,姚卫星,余雄庆,等.多学科设计优化中常用代理模型的研究[J].计算力学学报,2005,22(5):608-612 Mu Xuefeng,Yao Weixing,Yu Xiongqing,et al.A survey of surrogate models used in MDO[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2005,22(5):608-612(in Chinese) [7] Bolender M A,Doman D B.Nonlinear longitudinal dynamical model of an air-breathing hypersonic vehicle[J].Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets,2007,44(2):374-387 [8] Rodriguez A A,Dickeson J J,Cifdaloz O.Modeling and control of scramjet-powered hypersonic vehicles:chanllenges,traneds,&tradeoffs[R].AIAA 2008-6793,2008 [9] Chaput A J.Preliminary sizing methodology for hypersonic vehicles[J].Journal of Aircraft,1992,29(2):172-179 [10] 罗世彬.高超声速飞行器机体/发动机一体化及总体多学科设计优化方法研究[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学航天与材料工程学院,2004 Luo Shibin.Resrarch on airframe/engine in integration issues and multidisciplinary optimization methods for air-breathing hypersonic vehicle[D].Changsha:Inst of Aerospace & Material Engineering,National University of Defense Technology,2004(in Chinese) [11] 许林.飞行器MDO过程及相关技术研究与应用[D].长沙:国防科学技术大学航天与材料工程学院,2009 Xu Lin.Research and application of aerospace vehicle MDO process and related technologies[D].Changsha:Inst of Aerospace & Material Engineering,National University of Defense Technology,2009(in Chinese)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计