Approach of UAS airspace integration based on systematic classification and level of safety assessment
-
摘要: 无人机的空域集成，即无人机进入非隔离空域飞行与有人机共享空域，是未来发展的必然趋势，这也给空中交通管理带来了新的挑战.参照美国的空域集成计划，需要建立在空域详细分类的基础上，根据无人机的综合能力逐步实现无人机从单一空域到多空域，从隔离空域到非隔离空域的动态运行.而无人机的综合能力分类可以从体系划分和安全能力两个角度出发，综合衡量；其中，无人机体系基于自主能力和监管方式两个关键因素来划分.基于这种方法，分析可以初步确定一类无人机可以飞行的空域类型，以及跨越不同空域的方式，从而实现无人机空域集成.Abstract: UAS (Unmanned Aircraft System) airspace integration, which means UAVs entering non-segregated airspace, is the trend of next generation air transportation system,which will also bring new challenges to the air traffic management.Referring to the airspace integration project of United States, the classification of airspace should be proposed. Based on the comprehensive capacity of the UAS, the operations profile can lead to a full dynamic operation solution. Aiming at evaluating UAS, two aspects are taken into consideration: the classification of the systems and the assessment of safety level; in which the two key factors of system classification are autonomouscontrolabilityand surveillance method. The airspace integration of a certain type of UAS can be achieved by define the accessible airspace and the mode of operating through different types of airspace.
-
[1] Loh R.Safety requirements for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in future civil airspace[C]//Record-IEEE PLANS, Position Location and Navigation Symposium.2006:1151-1163 [2] Burkle M W M T.The integrated airport-a NextGen testbed/[C]/Integrated Communications, Navigation, and Surveillance Conference 2008.2008:375-381 [3] Ryan N, Van Dyk D H P R, Yacov Y, et al.Systems integration of unmanned aircraft into the national airspace:part of the federal aviation administration next generation air transportation system[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Systems and InformationEngineering Design Symposium.2012:151-156 [4] Euteneuer E A, George P.UAS insertion into commercial airspace:europe and US standards perspective[C]//30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference Closing the Generation Gap:Increasing Capability for Flight Operations among Legacy, Modern and Uninhabited Aircraft, DASC 2011.2011:1-11 [5] Department of Defense, United States.Unmanned systems integrated roadmap FY2011-2036[R].2011 [6] Weibel R E.Safety considerations for operation of different classes of UAVs in the NAS[C]//Collection of Technical Papers-AIAA 4th Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Forum, ATIO.2004:180-190 [7] 陈宗基, 魏金钟, 王英勋, 等.无人机自主控制等级及其系统结构研究[J].航空学报, 2011, 32 (6):1075-1083 Chen Zongji, Wei Jinzhong, Wang Yingxun, et al.UAV autonomous control levels and system structure[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32 (6):1075-1083 (in Chinese) [8] European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.Eurocontrol specifications for the use of military unmanned aerial vehicles as operational air traffic outside segregated airspace.2007 [9] Simpson A J S J.Safety challenges in flying UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) in non-segregated airspace[C]//The 1st Institution of Engineering and Technology International Conference.2006:81-88 [10] Dalamagkidis K V K P.Evaluating the risk of unmanned aircraft ground impacts[C]//Control and Automation, 2008 16th Mediterranean Conference on 2008.2008:709-716 [11] Clothier R A W R.A casualty risk analysis for unmanned aerial system (UAS) operations over inhabited areas[C]//AIAC12-Twelfth Australian International Aerospace Congress, 2nd Australasian Unmanned Air Vehicles Conference.Melbourne:[s.n.], 2007:1286-1293 [12] Speijker L, Lee X, van de Leijgraaf R.Framework for unmanned aircraft systems safety risk management[J].SAE International Journal of Aerospace, 2011:1228-1242 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1419
- HTML全文浏览量: 89
- PDF下载量: 534
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
