同类异质产品三方古诺模型的拓展与应用

王玉灵; 陈 娟

同类异质产品三方古诺模型的拓展与应用

王玉灵,
陈娟

北京航空航天大学经济管理学院, 北京 100191

详细信息

作者简介:
王玉灵(1964-),男,内蒙古准格尔旗人,副教授, yulwang@buaa.edu.cn.

中图分类号: TB 114.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 3965
- HTML全文浏览量: 121
- PDF下载量: 1170
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-11-30
- 网络出版日期: 2009-10-31

Cournot oligopoly and its application: an extension to heterogeneous products with three participants

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 运用过程创新基准效益的概念和异质产品寡占模型的分析方法,将双寡头古诺模型扩展到同类异质产品竞争的三方寡占的古诺模型.研究了过程创新的博弈过程,得到满足私人效益最优的投资水平与满足社会效益最优的投资水平并指明了求解过程.两种最优化过程具有密切联系.将模仿创新者的模仿吸收能力识别为除技术领先者和模仿者之间的技术势差外又一影响模仿创新的因素.探讨了纯技术溢出并在修正原有学习模型的基础上建立了基于学习动力和学习能力双因素的学习模型.建立过程创新的古诺模型和学习模型都将把原有模型拓展到更符合大多数产业竞争和制造与创新过程的现实情况.
- 古诺模型 /
- 寡占 /
- 过程创新
Abstract: The concept on benchmark benefit of process innovation and the method of analyzing on oligopoly competition model with heterogeneous products were applied to extend the original study of two participants to the case of three participants in Cournot oligopoly. The gaming process of innovation was researched. Both the innovation level maximizing private profit and that maximizing social profit were brought out and the solving process was given. The main characteristics of the two optimizing process have undeniable connections. The innovation follower-s absorbing capacity was recognized as another factor influencing the imitated innovation, besides the knowledge distance between the innovation leader and its follower. The pure knowledge spillover was studied and absorbing capability was brought to help found another study model based on both study force and study capacity. Both the process innovation-s Cournot model and the innovation-s study model can extend the original models to real competition in most industries and manufacturing & innovation reality.
- Cournot model /
- oligopoly /
- process innovation

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] Hckner J. A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies [J]. Journal of Economic Theory,2000,93:233-239 [2] Rosenkrantz S. Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation[M]. Berlin: Wissens-chaftszentrum,1995 [3] Bonanno G, Haworth B. Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,1998,16:495-510 [4] Mussa M, Rosen S. Monopoly and product quality [J]. Journal of Economic Theory,1978,18:301-317 [5] Lenox M J, Rocket S F, Lewin A Y. Interdependency, competition, and the distribution of manufacturer and industry profits [J]. Management Science,2006,52(5):757-772 [6] Lin P, Saggi K. Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition [J]. European Economic Review,2002(46):201-211 [7] Kamien M, Schwartz N. Market structure and innovation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982 [8] Schumpeter J A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy [M] .New York:Harper,1942 [9] Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions Nelson R. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press,1962:609-626 [10] Qiu L D. On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria [J]. Journal of Economic Theory,1997,75:213-229 [11] Yi S S. Market structure and incentives to innovate: the case of Cournot oligopoly [J]. Economics Letters,1999,65:379-388 [12] Cellini R, Lambertini L. Dynamic R&D with spillovers:Competition vs cooperation [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control,2009,33:568-582 [13] Symeonidis G. Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003,21:39-55 [14] Agiza H N, Bischi G I, Kopel M. Multistability in a dynamic Cournot game with three oligopolists [J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,1999,51:63-90 [15] Puu T. Chaos in duopoly pricing [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,1992,1:573-581 [16] Puu T. Complex dynamics with three oligopolists [J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,1996,7:2075-2081 [17] 江海峰. 三寡头企业行为的博弈分析[J]. 安徽工业大学学报:自然科学版,2005,22(3):303-306 Jiang Haifeng. Game analysis for the action of oligarchic enterprise [J]. Journal of Anhui University of Technology,2005,22(3):303-306 (in Chinese) [18] 徐晋,廖刚,陈宏民. 多寡头古诺竞争与斯塔尔博格竞争的对比研究[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,2006,2:49-54 Xu Jin, Liao Gang, Chen Hongmin. Comparative study on multi-Cournot competition model and multi-Stackelberg competition model [J]. System Engineering-Theory & Practice,2006,2:49-54(in Chinese) [19] 王玉灵,张世英. 过程创新基准效益分析[J]. 系统工程学报,2003,18:356-362 Wang Yuling, Zhang Shiying. Analyzing on benchmark benefit of process innovation [J]. Journal of Systems Engineering,2003,18:356-362(in Chinese) [20] 王玉灵,张世英.技术创新溢出机制的研究与建模[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2001,10(4):337-341 Wang Yuling, Zhang Shiying. Studying and modeling on mechanism of technology innovation effects spillover [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory Methodology Application,2001,10(4):337-341(in Chinese) [21] Hur K I, Watanabe C. Unintentional technique spillover between two sectors: kinetic approach [J] . Technovation,2001,21:227-235

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计