双机编队的对地攻击效能分析

孙康文; 黄俊; 武哲

双机编队的对地攻击效能分析

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

详细信息

作者简介:
孙康文(1980-),男,安徽合肥人,博士生,sunkw100@ase.buaa.edu.cn.

中图分类号: V 271.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 2497
- HTML全文浏览量: 45
- PDF下载量: 692
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2005-07-14
- 网络出版日期: 2006-06-30

Operational effectiveness analyses of air-to-ground strike for two-plane formation

School of Aeronautic Science and Technology, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 双机编队是空防体系对抗中一种主要的作战模式,其目的是为了更有效地打击敌战略目标.通过采用概率论中常用于效能评估的马尔柯夫随机过程理论,建立了双机编队条件下对敌对战略目标进行攻击的战场想定和数学模型,推导出任务成功率、目标被毁率和飞机损失率等作战效能指标的计算公式.最后,通过生存力扩展因子的引入,在比较双机独立和双机编队相关效能指标的基础上指出了双机编队的作战优势.
- 双机编队 /
- 作战效能 /
- 概率论 /
- 马尔柯夫随机过程 /
- 生存力扩展因子
Abstract: Two-plane formation is a main organization of the battle mode in the rivalry of air defense, which can fight the enemy’s strategic target more effectively. By using Markov random processes, a method of probability, which usually can be used in the evaluation of system’s effectiveness, the prediction of battle field and the mathematics model under the condition of two-plane formation which attacked the enemy strategic target in a threat environment were built. The operational effectiveness measures of the two-plane formation, including the probability of mission success, the probability that the target was killed and the probability that the aircraft was killed for an air-to-ground target attacking operation were deduced. Finally, by introducing viability enhanced quotient in an instance, the superiority of two-plane formation in attacking the enemy strategic surface target in a dangerous environment was validated by means of the comparison between two-plane interindependence and two-plane formation in their relative effectiveness measures.
- two-plane formation /
- operational effectiveness /
- probability /
- Markov random processes /
- viability enhanced quotient

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] 艾剑良. 攻击机作战效能评估的顶层数学模型[J]. 飞行力学,1999,17(2):19-24 Ai Jianliang. Top mathematical model for operational effectiveness analysis of attacker[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1999, 17(2):19-24(in Chinese) [2] Kish B A, Mittlestead D R, Wunderlich G, et al. Practical limits of supermaneuverability and full envelope agility . AIAA96-3493, 1996 [3] Fielding J P, Nilubol O. A design assessment methodology for combat aircraft operational effectiveness . AIAA Paper 2003-6551, 2003 [4] Al-Ahmed S, Fielding J. Integrating combat effectiveness disciplines into the conceptual/preliminary design process . AIAA95-3904, 1995 [5] 黄俊,孙义东,武哲,等.战斗机对地攻击作战效能分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2002,28(3):354-357 Huang Jun, Sun Yidong, Wu Zhe, et al. Operational effectiveness analyses of air-to-ground strike for battle-plane[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2002,28(3):354-357(in Chinese) [6] Ray P T, Thomas D, Jeff S G. Impact of aircraft flight dynamics modeling technique on weapon system beyond-visual-range combat effectiveness . AIAA Paper 2003-5689, 2003 [7] 邹俊,韩景倜,闫永刚,等.对抗条件下双机编队空-地作战效能评估[J].电光与控制,2004,11(1):25-27 Zou Jun, Han Jingti, Yan Yonggang, et al. Evaluation of air-to-ground combat efficiency with two-plane formation under oppositing condition[J].Electronics Optics & Control,2004,11(1):25-27(in Chinese) [8] Hovanessian S A. Radar detection and tracking system[M]. MA:Artech House Inc, 1973 [9] 朱宝鎏,朱荣昌,熊笑非.作战飞机效能评估[M].北京:航空工业出版社,1993:64-91 Zhu Baoliu, Zhu Rongchang, Xiong Xiaofei. Assessments of effectiveness for aircraft[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press,1993:64-91(in Chinese)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计