轮盘概念设计中拓扑和形状同时优化方法

范俊; 尹泽勇; 王建军; 米栋; 闫成

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0232

轮盘概念设计中拓扑和形状同时优化方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0232

范俊^1,2,
尹泽勇^1,3, ,,
王建军¹,
米栋^1,3,
闫成¹

1.
北京航空航天大学能源与动力工程学院, 北京 100191
2. 陆航研究所, 北京 101121
3. 中航工业航空动力机械研究所, 株洲 412002

基金项目: 国家863计划资助项目(2006AA04Z418)

详细信息

作者简介:
范俊(1982―),男,江西丰城人,博士生,fanjun93404@126.com

通讯作者:
尹泽勇(1945—),男,重庆人,院士,yinzy@cae.cn,主要研究方向为航空发动机多学科优化设计技术.

中图分类号: V231.91
计量
- 文章访问数: 1157
- HTML全文浏览量: 108
- PDF下载量: 601
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-04-29
- 网络出版日期: 2015-03-20

Simultaneous topology and shape optimization method in conceptual design of disk

FAN Jun^1,2,
YIN Zeyong^{1,3
, ,},
WANG Jianjun¹,
MI Dong^1,3,
YAN Cheng¹

1.
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
2. Aviation Research Institute, Beijing 101121, China
3. Aviation Powerplant Research Institute, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Zhuzhou 412002, China

摘要

摘要: 为了减小人为选择参数对优化结果的影响,针对航空发动机轮盘概念设计阶段的结构优化问题,提出了拓扑和形状同时优化(STSO)法.该方法是在变密度(SIMP)法的基础上,通过分析优化目标和约束的灵敏度,用序列二次规划优化(SQP)法进行求解.接着,以板壳结构为例,对比分析了STSO法和分步优化法的结果,说明了拓扑和形状同时优化方法的优点.最后,将同时优化方法应用于轮盘结构概念设计,对比分析了使用拓扑和形状同时优化方法与单独拓扑优化方法进行轮盘结构优化的结果,探讨了不同振型对应的频率约束对优化结果的影响.结果表明,不同振型对应的频率约束下优化结果的结构形式呈现多样性;相较于单独拓扑优化方法,STSO法收敛速度较快、结果也更精确;但是由于形状优化变量取值范围选取不当,有可能会出现网格畸变过大,而导致STSO法所得的结果无效.
- 航空发动机 /
- 轮盘 /
- 拓扑和形状同时优化法 /
- 变密度法 /
- 频率约束
Abstract: To minimize the effects of artificially chosen variables on optimization results, simultaneous topology and shape optimization (STSO) method was proposed for structural optimization of aero-engine disk at the conceptual design phase. This method was based on solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method, by analyzing the sensitivities of the optimized object and constraints, sequential quadratic programming (SQP) optimized method was used to solve the problem. Then, taking shell structure for instant, the results of STSO method and multi-step optimization method were comparatively analyzed, which confirmed the advantage of STSO method. At last, the STSO method was utilized to design a conceptual disk structure. Results of disk structural optimization of STSO method were compared to that of the sole topology optimization method. Influence of frequency constraints of different vibration modes on optimization results was discussed. The results show that the structural forms of optimization results of frequency constraints of different vibration modes vary a lot. Convergence rate of STSO method is faster than that of solo topology optimization, and the consequences of STSO method are more accurate. Meanwhile, the results of STSO method may be invalid for excessive mesh distortion caused by the wrong choice of the value range of shape optimization variables.
- aero-engine /
- disk /
- simultaneous topology and shape optimization method /
- solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) /
- frequency constraint

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	Deaton J D, Grandhi R V.A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization:post 2000[J].Struct Multidisc Optim,2014,49(1):1-38.
[2]	Ansola R, Canales J,Tarrago J A,et al.An integrated approach for shape and topology optimization of shell structures[J].Computer & Structures.2002,80(5):449-458.
[3]	Hassani B, Tavakkoli S M,Ghasemnejad H.Simultaneous shape and topology optimizationof shell structures[J].Struct Multidisc Optim.2013,48(1):221-233.
[4]	张卫红,杨军刚, 朱继宏.压力载荷下的结构拓扑-形状协同优化[J].航空学报,2009,30(12):2335-2341. Zhang W H,Yang J G,Zhu J H.Simultaneous topology and shape optimization of pressure loaded structures[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2009,30(12):2335-2341(in Chinese).
[5]	刘超. 涡轮盘结构拓扑与形状优化方法研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2010. Liu C.Topology and shape optimization method for turbine disk[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2010(in Chinese).
[6]	宋健,温卫东, 崔海涛,等.航空发动机多辐板风扇盘拓扑优化与形状优化设计技术[J].推进技术,2013,34(9):1188-1196. Song J,Wen W D,Cui H T,et al.Topology and shape optimization method for multi-web fan disk in aero-engine[J].Journal of Propulsion Technology,2013,34(9):1188-1196(in Chinese).
[7]	李伦未,陆山. 基于ANSYS的多辐板风扇盘结构优化设计技术[J].航空动力学报,2011,26(10):2245-2250. Li L W,Lu S.Structure optimum design techniques for multi-web fan disk based on ANSYS[J].Journal of Aerospace Power,2011,26(10):2245-2250(in Chinese).
[8]	荣见华,唐国军, 罗银燕,等.考虑位移要求的大型三维连续体结构拓扑优化数值技术研究[J].工程力学,2007,24(3):20-27. Rong J H,Tang G J,Luo Y Y,et al.A research on the numerical topology optimization technology of large three-dimensional continuum structures considering displacement requirements[J].Engineering Mechanics,2007,24(3):20-27(in Chinese).
[9]	左孔天,陈立平, 钟毅芳,等.基于人工材料密度的新型拓扑优化理论和算法研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(12):31-37. Zuo K T,Chen L P,Zhong Y F,et al.New theory and algorithm research about topology optimization based on artificial material density[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2004,40(12):31-37(in Chinese).
[10]	邹春江,左孔天,向宇,等.基于SIMP方法微电容加速度计结构固有频率拓扑优化[J].科学技术与工程,2011,11(29): 7086-7091. Zhou C J,Zuo K T,Xiang Y,et al.Natural frequency topology optimization for structure of micro-capacitive accelerometer based on SIMP method[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2011,11(29):7086-7091(in Chinese).
[11]	叶红玲,沈静娴, 隋允康.频率约束的三维连续体结构动力拓扑优化设计[J].力学学报,2012,44(6):1037-1045. Ye H L,Shen J X,Sui Y K.Dynamic topological optimal design of three-dimensional continuum structures with frequencies constraints[J].Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2012,44(6):1037-1045(in Chinese).
[12]	张维声. 基于水平集方法的应力相关拓扑优化问题研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2013. Zhang W S.Studies on stress-related topology optimization problem via level set approach[D].Dalian:Dalian University of Technology,2013(in Chinese).
[13]	隋允康, 叶红玲,彭细荣.应力约束全局化策略下的连续体结构拓扑优化[J].力学学报,2006,38(3):364-370. Sui Y K,Ye H L,Peng X R.Topological optimization of continuum structure under the strategy of globalization of stress constraints [J].Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2006,38(3):364-370(in Chinese).
[14]	荣见华,葛森, 邓果,等.基于位移和应力灵敏度的结构拓扑优化设计[J].力学学报,2009,41(4):518-529. Rong J H,Ge S,Deng G,et al.Structure topological optimization based on displacement and stress sensitivity analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics,2009,41(4): 518-529(in Chinese).
[15]	Paris J,Navarria F, Colominas I,et al.Stress constraints sensitivity analysis in structural topology optimization[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2010,199(133): 2110-2122.
[16]	Kai-Uwe B, Matthias F,Fernass D.Approximation of derivatives in semi-analytical structural optimization[J].Computers & Structures,2008,86(13):1404-1416.
[17]	De Boer H, Van Keulen F.Refined semi-analytical design sensitivities[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,2000,37(46):6961-6980.
[18]	Van Keulen F, Haftka R T,Kim N H.Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis.Part 1 linear systems[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering,2005,194(30):3213-3243.
[19]	Fletche R. Practical methods of optimization[M].New York:John Wiley and Sons,1987:304-319.
[20]	Nocedal J, Wright.S J.Numerical optimization[M].New York:Springer Series in Operations Research,1999:529-561.