显示界面多维视觉编码综合评价模型

肖旭; 完颜笑如; 庄达民

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0428

显示界面多维视觉编码综合评价模型

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2014.0428

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100191

基金项目: 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2010CB734104); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20121102120013)

详细信息

作者简介:
肖旭(1990—),女,湖北荆州人,博士研究生,xiaoxu@ase.buaa.edu.cn

通讯作者:
完颜笑如(1981—),女,河北涿州人,讲师,wanyanxiaoru@buaa.edu.cn,主要研究方向为人机工效.

中图分类号: R857.1;B842.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 1082
- HTML全文浏览量: 91
- PDF下载量: 598
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-07-17
- 网络出版日期: 2015-06-20

Comprehensive evaluation model of multidimensional visual coding on display interface

School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 为预测与评估多维视觉编码对飞行员信息辨识的影响,在大量已有单维视觉编码研究的基础上,采用元分析和综合绩效法对显示界面上的多维视觉编码进行归一量化,结合G1法所确定的权重系数并运用模糊加权平均算子,建立了一种新的显示界面多维视觉编码综合评价数学模型.为了验证模型的效度,对波音和空客界面进行了综合评价,据此设计出优化界面,采用22名被试在不同显示界面下开展仪表监视实验,并采用了主观评价法、任务绩效评价法和生理评价法(包括眼动追踪测量和心电图时域指标测量)3种方法记录实验数据.综合测评结果表明:模型的理论预测值与多种实验方法测量结果显著相关,优化界面更利于被试完成信息辨识任务.显示界面多维视觉编码综合评价模型的提出对指导飞机驾驶舱显示界面的设计具有一定的参考价值.
- 显示界面 /
- 视觉编码 /
- 综合评价模型 /
- 生理测评 /
- 人机工效
Abstract: To predict and evaluate the effects of multidimensional visual coding on pilot's information identification, a new comprehensive evaluation mathematical model of multidimensional visual coding on display interface, which adopted meta-analyses and integrated performance values (IPVs) for the unitary quantification of multidimensional visual coding, and combined the weight coefficient determined by G1 method with fuzzy weighted average operator, was proposed based on a large number of existing research about single-dimensional visual coding. In order to verify the validity of the model, interfaces of Boeing and Airbus were comprehensively evaluated, based on which optimized interface was designed. 22 subjects performed an instrument supervision task under different display interface. Subjective evaluation, performance measure and physiological assessment, including eye-movement tracking and electrocardiogram (ECG) time domain index, were introduced to record the experimental data. The integrated experimental results reveal that theoretical predictions calculated by the model is significantly correlated with the practical experimental results, and the optimized interface provides performance advantages, especially for more difficult tasks. This comprehensive evaluation model of multidimensional visual coding on display interface will provide a reference for the optimized design of aircraft cockpit display interface.
- display interface /
- visual coding /
- comprehensive evaluation model /
- physiological measurement /
- ergonomic

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	童时中.人机工程设计与应用手册[M].北京:中国标准出版社, 2007:112-152. Tong S Z.Handbook of human-machine engineering design and application[M].Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2007:112-152(in Chinese).
[2]	Lu S A, Wickens C D, Prinet J C, et al.Supporting interruption management and multimodal interface design:Three meta-analyses of task performance as a function of interrupting task modality[J].Human Factors, 2013, 55(4):697-724.
[3]	Wickens C D.Display formatting and situation awareness model(DFSAM):An approach to aviation display design, AHFD-05-14/NASA-05-5[R].Illinois:Aviation Human Factors Division, 2005.
[4]	Stelzer E M, Wickens C D.Pilots strategically compensate for display enlargements in surveillance and flight control tasks[J].Human Factors, 2006, 48(1):166-181.
[5]	Wickens C D, Ambinder M S, Alexander A L.The role of highlighting in visual search through maps[J].Spatial Vision, 2004, 17(4-5):373-388.
[6]	王嫣嫣, 郭小朝, 孙明炤.液晶显示不同颜色编码搭配方式的工效学研究[J].人类工效学, 2012, 18(3):12-15. Wang Y Y, Guo X C, Sun M Z.Ergonomics research on color-coding collocation modes applied in liquid crystal display[J].Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2012, 18(3):12-15(in Chinese).
[7]	熊端琴, 郭小朝, 王红, 等.飞行员对黑体汉字字形的视觉偏好研究[J].人类工效学, 2014, 20(1):45-46. Xiong D Q, Guo X C, Wang H, et al.Visual preference of pilots to bold Chinese font[J].Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 2014, 20(1):45-46(in Chinese).
[8]	周颖伟, 庄达民, 吴旭, 等.显示界面字符编码工效设计与分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(6):761-765. Zhou Y W, Zhuang D M, Wu X, et al.Ergonomic design and analysis of character coding on display interface[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(6):761-765(in Chinese).
[9]	张慧姝.飞机驾驶舱显示界面工效设计与评价[D].北京:北京航空航天大学, 2011. Zhang H S.Design and estimate of ergonomics about display interface cockpit[D].Beijing:Beihang University, 2011(in Chinese).
[10]	曾庆新, 庄达民.多界面多任务下不同任务权重的目标辨认[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 32(5):499-502. Zeng Q X, Zhuang D M.Target identification of different task weight under multi-interface and multi-task[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 32(5):499-502(in Chinese).
[11]	Zhang L, Zhuang D M, Wanyan X R.Information coding for cockpit human-machine interface[J].Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 24(4): 707-712.
[12]	Wei H Y, Zhuang D M, Wanyan X R.An experimental analysis of situation awareness for cockpit display interface evaluation based on flight simulation[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(4):884-889.
[13]	Ma C X, Zhuang D M, Wanyan X R.Flight simulation and optimal design of information coding[C]//AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference.Reston:AIAA, 2011:1-8.
[14]	Wanyan X R, Zhuang D M, Lu S S.Effects of perceptual load related to flight task on auditory ERPs[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2011, 47(6):995-1002.
[15]	李银霞, 杨峰, 王黎静, 等.飞机驾驶舱工效学综合评价研究及其应用[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2005, 31(6):652-656. Li Y X, Yang F, Wang L J, et al.Study on comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics and its application[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005, 31(6):652-656(in Chinese).
[16]	Hart S G, Staveland L E.Development of NASA TLX(task load index):Results of empirical and theoretical research[M].Amsterdam:Elsevier, 1988:139-183.
[17]	Dehais F, Causse M, Pastor J.Toward the definition of a pilot's physiological state vector through oculometry:A preliminary study in real flight conditions[C]//2nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace.Cape Canaveral, Florida:Interaction Design Foundation, 2010:1-8.
[18]	Thayer J F, Yamamoto S S, Brosschot J F.The relationship of autonomic imbalance, heart rate variability and cardiovascular disease risk factors[J].International Journal of Cardiology, 2010, 141(2):122-131.