参数化产品族递进式优化设计方法

魏巍; 冯毅雄; 程锦

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0002

参数化产品族递进式优化设计方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0002

魏巍^1, ,,
冯毅雄²,
程锦²

1.
北京航空航天大学机械工程及自动化学院, 北京 100191
2. 浙江大学流体动力与机电系统国家重点实验室, 杭州 310027

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(51205010,51322506); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金; 浙江省自然科学基金(LR14E050003)

详细信息

通讯作者:
魏巍(1982—),男,辽宁沈阳人,讲师,weiwei@buaa.edu.cn,主要研究方向为产品平台设计、产品族设计、制造业信息化.

中图分类号: TH11
计量
- 文章访问数: 813
- HTML全文浏览量: 74
- PDF下载量: 446
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-04
- 网络出版日期: 2015-09-20

Parametric product family progressive optimization design approach

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China
2. The State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China

摘要

摘要: 基于产品平台技术,提出了基于混合进化算法的参数化产品族递进式优化设计方法.建立了参数化产品族的递进式优化设计流程,提出改进的强度Pareto进化算法(SPEA2+)与非支配排序遗传算法(NSGA-II)相结合的多目标混合进化算法对参数化产品族设计问题进行优化,混合进化算法使用了两类种群进行求解,解决了同步进化带来的数据扰动问题.在参数化产品族递进式优化设计过程中,首先优化产品族设计平台,建立参数化产品族设计问题的多目标优化数学模型,通过产品设计参数的敏感度分析和变差指数计算,划分产品平台的设计常量和设计变量,形成稳健的产品平台来获得最优参数.然后对产品族中实例产品的多个性能进行优化,在已有的产品平台基础上,优化设计变量的取值.最后,以电动机产品族的递进式优化设计过程为例证明了该方法的有效性和适用性.
- 产品族设计 /
- 产品平台 /
- 递进式设计 /
- 混合进化算法 /
- 敏感度 /
- 变差指数
Abstract: Parametric product family progressive optimization design approach is proposed based on product platform technique. The progressive optimization design process was constructed, the optimization of product family was carried out progressively using multi-objective mix-evolution algorithm. The mix-evolution algorithm used two kinds of populations to avoid the data perturbation problem. The strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2+and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II were used progressively in the product platform design and product instance optimization. In the product family progressive optimization, the product platform was identified firstly. The multi-objective optimization mathematics optimization model of parametric product family was constructed, the sensibility of design parameter was analyzed and the diversity factor was calculated. The product platform constants and variables were divided. As a result, the product platform was constructed. Then the performances of each individual instance product were optimized in the robust product platform to get the optimal design parameter. Finally, the design of electromotor product family was used as an example to certify the proposed method's effectiveness and applicability.
- product family design /
- product platform /
- progressive design /
- mix-evolution algorithm /
- sensibility /
- diversity factor

HTML全文

参考文献(17)

[1]	樊蓓蓓,纪杨建,祁国宁,等.产品族零部件关系网络实证分析及演化[J].浙江大学学报:工学版,2009,43(2):213-219.Fan B B,Ji Y J,Qi G N,et al.Demonstration analysis and evolution of parts relationship network for product family[J].Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science,2009,43(2):213-219(in Chinese).
[2]	Dai Z,Scoot M.Product platform design through sensitivity analysis and cluster analysis[J].Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2007,18(1):97-113.
[3]	Nomaguchi Y,Askhøj A,Madsen K F,et al.Study on how to select appropriate design methods for product platform and family design[J].Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu,C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers,Part C,2013,79:866-879.
[4]	Akundi S V K,Simpson T W,Reed P M.Multi-objective design optimization for product platform and product family design using genetic algorithms[C]//Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.167 Jalan Bukit Merah:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,2005,2B:999-1008.
[5]	Khajavirad A,Michalek J J,Simpson T W.A decomposed genetic algorithm for solving the joint product family optimization Problem[C]//Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures,Structural Dynamics,and Materials Conference.Reston:AIAA,2007,2:2111-2124.
[6]	Kumar R,Allada V.Scalable platforms using ant colony optimization[J].Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,2007,18(1):127-142.
[7]	Alizon F,Shooter S,Simpson T W.Improving an existing product family based on commonality/diversity,modularity,and cost[J].Design Studies,2007,28(4):387-409.
[8]	张换高,赵文燕,江屏,等.基于相似性与结构敏感性分析的产品平台设计过程模型[J].机械工程学报,2012,48(11):104-118.Zhang H G,Zhao W Y,Jiang P,et al.Product platform design process model based on similarity and structural sensitivity analysis[J].Mechanical Engineering,2012,48(11):104-118(in Chinese).
[9]	李柏姝,唐加福,雒兴刚.面向细分市场的产品族规划方法及应用[J].计算机集成制造系统,2009,15(6):1055-1061.Li B S,Tang J F,Lou X G.Method and application of product family design for market niche[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2009,15(6):1055-1061(in Chinese).
[10]	李中凯,朱真才,程志红,等.基于联合分析和定量指数的柔性产品平台多目标规划方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(8):1757-1765.Li Z K,Zhu Z C,Cheng Z H,et al.Multiobjective planning for flexible product platform based on conjoint analysis and quantitative indices[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2011,17(8):1757-1765(in Chinese).
[11]	Simpson T,Seepersad C,Mistree F.Balancing commonality and performance within the concurrent design of multiple products in a product family[J].Concurrent Engineering:Research and Applications,2001,10(11):1-14.
[12]	Scott M,Antonsson E.Using indifference points in engineering decisions[C]//Proceedings of 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences.167 Jalan Bukit Merah:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,2000:225-243.
[13]	陈永亮,褚巍丽,徐燕申.面向可适应性的参数化产品平台设计[J].计算机集成制造系统,2007,13(5):877-884.Chen Y L,Chu W L,Xu Y S.Adaptability-oriented parametric product platform design[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2007,13(5):877-884(in Chinese).
[14]	Kim M,Hiroyasu T,Miki M.SPEA2+:Improving the performance of the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm2[J].Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN VIII,2004,3242:742-751.
[15]	Deb K,Pratap A,Agarwal S.A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm:NSGA-II[J].IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,2002,6(2):182-197.
[16]	Simpson T W,Maier J R,Mistree F.Product platform design:Method and application[J].Research in Engineering Design,2001,13(1):2-22.
[17]	Zitzler E,Deb K,Thiele L.Comparison of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms:Empirical results[J].IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation,2000,18(2):173-195.