飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷判别预测生理模型

陆崑; 卫宗敏; 庄达民; 完颜笑如

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0254

飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷判别预测生理模型

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2015.0254

1.
中国民航管理干部学院航空器适航审定系, 北京 10010
2. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

基金项目: 国家“973”计划(2010CB734104);民航安全能力建设资金(MHRD20141010)

详细信息

作者简介:
陆崑男,硕士,副教授。主要研究方向:航空器适航审定技术。 Tel.: 010-58250631 E-mail: lukun@camic.cn;卫宗敏男,博士,讲师。主要研究方向:航空事故分析方法、适航审定技术与管理、人机工效学。 Tel.: 010-58250631 E-mail: weizongmin8411@163.com

通讯作者:
卫宗敏, Tel.: 010-58250631 E-mail: weizongmin8411@163.com

中图分类号: V857.1;B842.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 1090
- HTML全文浏览量: 97
- PDF下载量: 460
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-24
- 修回日期: 2015-05-29
- 网络出版日期: 2016-04-20

Integrated physiological model for mental workload assessment and prediction of aircraft flight deck display interface

1.
Development of Aircraft Airworthiness Certification, Civil Aviation Management Institute of China, Beijing 10010
2. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

Funds: Basic Research Program of China (2010CB734104);Civil Aviation Security Capacity Building Funds (MHRD20141010)

摘要

摘要: 针对飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷的客观判别预测问题,综合采用事件相关电位(ERP)、心电图(ECG)和眼电图(EOG)3类生理测量技术,结合主观测评法和绩效测评法,在同一飞行实验任务中开展脑力负荷的实验测量与数学建模研究。实验结果表明:随着脑力负荷的增加,ERP测量技术中的失匹配负波(MMN)成分的峰值幅度(在Fz电极处)显著增加,P3a成分的峰值(在Fz电极处)显著降低;ECG测量技术中的心率变异性指标全部窦性心搏RR间期(简称RR间期)的标准差(SDNN)的数值显著降低;EOG测量技术中的眨眼次数显著降低。在此基础上,基于Bayes判别方法构建了脑力负荷判别预测生理综合评估模型,并将生理综合评估模型判别结果与NASA任务负荷指数(NASA_TLX)量表判别结果进行了比较,生理综合评估模型判别结果略高于NASA_TLX判别结果。该模型为飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷状态的客观、实时判定和预测提供了一种新的方法,同时也为中国正在研发的新型战斗机和大型客机驾驶舱显示界面中的人为因素适航审定工作提供了新的符合性验证工具。
- 驾驶舱 /
- 显示界面 /
- 脑力负荷 /
- 生理测量 /
- 预测模型 /
- 适航审定
Abstract: This paper focuses on the objective discrimination and prediction of mental workload of the aircraft flight deck display interface. By three physiological measurement methods of event-related potentials (ERP), electrocardiograph (ECG) and electro-oculogram (EOG), as well as subjective evaluation and performance evaluation, both experimental measurement and mathematical modeling of mental workload were carried out under the same flight simulation task conditions. The experimental results indicate that as the mental workload increased, the peak amplitude of the mismatch negativity (MMN) at Fz significantly increased, while the peak amplitude of P3a at Fz, the standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals (SDNN) value, and the eye blink numbers significantly decreased. Based on the results of experimental measurement, the Bayesian discrimination analysis method was employed to construct the mental workload discrimination model of the aircraft flight deck display interface. The integrated physiological model showed a higher accuracy in the discrimination and prediction of mental workload compared with NASA_TLX. Thus, this model provides not only a new approach for the objective and real-time discrimination and prediction of mental workload of the aircraft cockpit display interface, but also a new compliance verification tool for the human factor airworthiness certification of flight deck display interface of the new generation fighter aircraft and large passenger aircraft.
- flight deck /
- display interface /
- mental workload /
- physiological measurement /
- prediction model /
- airworthiness certification

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

[1]	郭小朝,刘宝善, 马雪松,等.新型歼击机滑出/起飞阶段飞行员信息使用需求[J].人类工效学,2002,8(2):1-7. GUO X C,LIU B S,MA X S,et al.Cockpit information required by advanced fighter pilots for displays in taxiing take-off[J].Chinese Journal of Ergonomics,2002,8(2):1-7(in Chinese).
[2]	卫宗敏,完颜笑如, 庄达民.飞机座舱显示界面脑力负荷测量与评价[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2014,40(1):86-91. WEI Z M,WANYAN X R,ZHUANG D M.Measurement and evaluation of mental workload for aircraft cockpit display interface[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2014,40(1):86-91(in Chinese).
[3]	卫宗敏. 飞机驾驶舱显示界面脑力负荷实验测量与数学建模[D].北京:北京航空航天大学,2014:7-8. WEI Z M.The experimental measurement and mathematical modeling of mental workload of aircraft cockpit display interface[D].Beijing:Beihang University,2014:7-8(in Chinese).
[4]	AKYEAMPONG J, UDOKA S,CARUSO G,et al.Evaluation of hydraulic excavator human-machine interface concepts using NASA_TLX[J].International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,2014,44(3):374-382.
[5]	CAO A, CHINTAMANI K K,PANDYA A K,et al.NASA_TLX:Software for assessing subjective mental workload[J].Behavior Research Methods,2009,41(1):113-117.
[6]	BYRNE A, TWEED N,HALLIGAN C.A pilot study of the mental workload of objective structured clinical examination examiners[J].Medical Education,2014,48(3):262-267.
[7]	BORGHINI G, ASTOLFI L,VECCHIATO G,et al.Measuring neurophysiological signals in aircraft pilots and car drivers for the assessment of mental workload,fatigue and drowsiness[J].Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2014,44:58-75.
[8]	HART S G, STAVELAND L E.Development of NASA-TLX (task load index):Results of empirical and theoretical research [J].Advances in Psychology,1988,52(6):139-183.
[9]	WEI Z M, ZHUANG D M,WANYAN X R,et al.A theoretical model of mental workload in pilots based on multiple experimental measurements[M]//HARRIS D.Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics.Berlin:Springer International Publishing,2014:104-113.
[10]	URSIN H, URSIN R.Physiological indicators of mental workload[M]//MORAY N.Mental workload.New York:Springer US,1979:349-365.
[11]	WEI Z M, ZHUANG D M,WANYAN X R,et al.A model for discrimination and prediction of mental workload of aircraft cockpit display interface[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,2014,27(5):1070-1077.
[12]	MIYAKE S, YAMADA S,SHOJI T,et al.Physiological responses to workload change.A test/retest examination[J].Applied Ergonomics,2009,40(6):987-996.
[13]	康卫勇,袁修干, 柳忠起.基于脑力负荷飞机座舱视觉显示界面优化设计[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2008,34(7):782-785. KANG W Y,YUAN X G,LIU Z Q.Optimization design of vision display interface in plane cockpit based on mental workload[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2008,34(7):782-785(in Chinese).
[14]	CAIN B. A review of the mental workload literature[J].Defence Research & Development,2007,9(4):1-34.
[15]	薛薇. SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].3版.北京:电子工业出版社,2013:295-298. XUE W.SPSS statistical analysis and application[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Electronic Industry Press,2013:295-298(in Chinese).
[16]	LEHRER P, KARAVIDAS M,LU S E,et al.Cardiac data increase association between self-report and both expert ratings of task load and task performance in flight simulator tasks:An exploratory study[J].International Journal of Psychophysiology,2010,76(2):80-87.
[17]	SOHN S Y, JO Y K.A study on the student pilot's mental workload due to personality types of both instructor and student[J].Ergonomics,2003,46(15):1566-1577.
[18]	KARAVIDAS M K, LEHRER P M,LU S E,et al.The effects of workload on respiratory variables in simulated flight:A preliminary study[J].Biological Psychology,2010,84(1):157-160.
[19]	WILLIGES R C, WIERWILLE W W.Behavioral measures of aircrew mental workload[J].Human Factors:The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,1979,21(5):549-574.