留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

新型双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的工作原理

陈洪芳 梁超伟 李宝山 谢华琨 石照耀

陈洪芳, 梁超伟, 李宝山, 等 . 新型双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的工作原理[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 48(1): 1-7. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0515
引用本文: 陈洪芳, 梁超伟, 李宝山, 等 . 新型双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的工作原理[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 48(1): 1-7. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0515
CHEN Hongfang, LIANG Chaowei, LI Baoshan, et al. Working principle of novel double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48(1): 1-7. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0515(in Chinese)
Citation: CHEN Hongfang, LIANG Chaowei, LI Baoshan, et al. Working principle of novel double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48(1): 1-7. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0515(in Chinese)

新型双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的工作原理

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2020.0515
基金项目: 

北京市自然科学基金 3182005

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    石照耀, E-mail: shizhaoyao@bjut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TH132.41;TP274

Working principle of novel double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact

Funds: 

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China 3182005

More Information
  • 摘要:

    大尺寸渐开线样板加工困难,测量更加困难,导致大齿轮的量值传递成为难题。采用圆弧代替渐开线齿廓,构造了新型大尺寸渐开线样板——双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板。提出了新型大尺寸渐开线样板的工作原理,研究了样板的设计方法,建立了样板的原理误差模型,提出了双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板可评定的齿轮测量仪器单项误差项,以及使用样板评定齿轮测量仪器的齿面偏差测量性能的方法。为验证所提工作原理的可行性,加工了原理验证样板,实验结果表明:加工的双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板,其测量得到的原理误差曲线与理论的原理误差曲线整体趋势一致,都为驼峰状,证明了双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的原理误差模型建立的准确性和可行性;在评定范围内,整个评定偏差曲线幅值为45.5 μm,对应产生的压力角误差为1.34 μm/rad;证明了双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的圆弧选取准则、中心距的设计模型和圆弧半径的设计模型的正确性。研究成果为大齿轮的量值传递提供了研究思路。

     

  • 图 1  双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板的原理误差示意图

    Figure 1.  Schematic diagram of principle error of double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact

    图 2  样板的原理误差曲线

    Figure 2.  Principle error curve of artifact

    图 3  双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板结构

    1—测量中心轴;2—定心轴;3—框架;4—基准块;5—V型块;6—夹箍。

    Figure 3.  Structure of double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact

    图 4  样板的有效测量范围

    Figure 4.  Effective measurement range of artifact

    图 5  评定偏差曲线

    Figure 5.  Evaluation deviation curve

    图 6  增益误差示意图

    Figure 6.  Schematic diagram of gain error

    图 7  滞后误差示意图

    Figure 7.  Schematic diagram of hysteresis error

    图 8  坐标系中的圆弧

    Figure 8.  Arc in coordinate system

    图 9  双轴式圆弧型大尺寸渐开线样板实验

    Figure 9.  Experiment of double-axis arc-shaped large-size involute artifact

    图 10  驼峰曲线

    Figure 10.  Hump curves

    图 11  实际评定偏差曲线

    Figure 11.  Actual evaluation deviation curve

    表  1  不同样板参数对应的绝对值最大原理误差

    Table  1.   Absolute maximum principle error corresponding to different artifact parameters

    齿数 模数/mm 绝对值最大原理误差/mm
    28 4 0.231 2
    28 8 0.379 2
    28 12 0.532 2
    28 16 0.686 4
    28 20 0.841 0
    28 24 0.995 9
    28 28 1.151 0
    28 32 1.306 2
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 石照耀, 林虎, 林家春, 等. 大齿轮测量: 现状与趋势[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(10): 35-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201310008.htm

    SHI Z Y, LIN H, LIN J C, et al. Current status and trends of large gears metrology[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(10): 35-44(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JXXB201310008.htm
    [2] 王长路, 王伟功, 张立勇, 等. 中国风电产业发展分析[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2015, 38(1): 148-154. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE201501020.htm

    WANG C L, WANG W G, ZHANG L Y, et al. The analysis of China wind power industry[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2015, 38(1): 148-154(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FIVE201501020.htm
    [3] RUDOLF O. History of gear measuring machines and traceability 1900—2006[J]. Gear Product News, 2006(10): 20-25.
    [4] HARTIG F, ROST K, GOCH G. Large gear material standard for the traceability of gears for transmission manufacturing[C]//International Conference on Gears, 2010: 1-14.
    [5] WIEMANN A K, STEIN M, KNIEL K. Traceable metrology for large involute gears[J]. Precision Engineering, 2019, 55: 330-338. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.10.001
    [6] CARMIGNATO S, CHIFFRE L D, BOSSE H, et al. Dimensional artefacts to achieve metrological traceability in advanced manufacturing[J]. CIRP Annals, 2020, 69(2): 693-716. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.009
    [7] KOMORI M, TAKEOKA F, KONDO K, et al. Design method of double ball artifact for use in evaluating the accuracy of a gear-measuring instrument[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2010, 132(7): 071010. doi: 10.1115/1.4001875
    [8] OSAWA S, SATO O, KONDO Y, et al. A novel artifact for evaluating accuracies of gear profile and pitch measurements of gear measuring instruments[C]//19th IMEKO World Congress, 2009, 3: 1574-1578.
    [9] KONDO Y, SASAJIMA K, OSAWA S, et al. Traceability strategy for gear-pitch-measuring instruments: Development and calibration of a multiball artifact[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2009, 20(6): 152-154.
    [10] ISO. Code of inspection practice. Part 1: Measurement of cylindrical gear tooth flanks: ISO/TR 10064-1[S]. Geneva: ISO, 2019.
    [11] ZELENY V, LINKEOVA I, SYKORA J, et al. Mathematical approach to evaluate involute gear profile and helix deviations without using special gear software[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 135: 150-164. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.01.030
    [12] WANG Q, PENG Y, WIEMANN A K, et al. Improved gear metrology based on the calibration and compensation of rotary table error motions[J]. CIRP Annals, 2019, 68(1): 511-514. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.078
    [13] KONDO K, TAKADA J. Study on tooth profiles of the harmonic drive[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1990, 112(1): 131-137. doi: 10.1115/1.2912570
    [14] 凌四营, 陈义磊, 凌明, 等. 齿轮渐开线样板安装偏心对齿廓倾斜偏差的影响[J]. 光学精密工程, 2019, 27(12): 2581-2588. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXJM201912011.htm

    LING S Y, CHEN Y L, LING M, et al. Influence of installation eccentricity on profile slope deviation of gear involute artifacts[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2019, 27(12): 2581-2588(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXJM201912011.htm
    [15] 杨国梁, 薛梓, 刘春杰, 等. 齿轮测量中心的校准方法探究[J]. 计量学报, 2009, 30(5A): 128-131.

    YANG G L, XUE Z, LIU C J, et al. Study on the calibration methods of gear measuring center[J]. Acta Metrologica Sinica, 2009, 30(5A): 128-131(in Chinese).
    [16] MICHAEL T H. Big gears better inspection[J]. Gear Solutions, 2010(2): 34-36.
  • 加载中
图(11) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  323
  • HTML全文浏览量:  64
  • PDF下载量:  135
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-09-14
  • 录用日期:  2020-10-30
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-01-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答