-
摘要:
基于耗氧型惰化系统惰化原理,建立了绿色低温催化惰化系统(3CGIS)的AMESim仿真模型,研究了绿色低温催化惰化系统抽吸气流量对惰化时间的影响,以及飞行包线内燃油箱气相空间氧气体积分数变化。将计算结果与试验数据进行对比,结果表明,飞行包线内燃油箱气相空间氧气体积分数计算结果与试验结果基本一致,验证了仿真模型的正确性。在此基础上,得到抽吸气流量与惰化时间近似呈反比关系;当惰化时间一定时,抽吸气流量随载油率的降低而增加;针对下降阶段燃油箱气相空间氧气体积分数可能超过12%,提出一种双流量惰化模式设计方法,可保证氧气体积分数在整个飞行包线内低于12%。仿真结果为绿色低温催化惰化系统的设计与优化提供了依据。
Abstract:Based on the principle of oxygen-consuming inerting system, the AMESim simulation model of low temperature controllable oxygen consumed catalytic green inerting system (3CGIS) was established. The effect of the suction flow rate of 3CGIS on the inerting time, and the change of the oxygen volume fraction in the fuel tank ullage under the flight envelope were researched. The prediction of oxygen volume fraction under the entire flight envelope was verified against the experimental data, showing a satisfactory agreement, and its validity wasvalidated with the comparison of results. On the basis of modeling, the suction flow rate is approximately inversely proportional to the initial inerting time were obtained; under a certain inerting time, the required suction flow rate increaseswith the decrease of fuel load. Aiming at the possibility that the oxygen volume fraction in the fuel tank ullage during the descent stage may exceed 12%, a dual-flow inerting mode design method is proposed to ensure that the oxygen volume fraction is less than 12% under the entire flight envelope. The results can be provided as a reference for design and optimization of low temperature controllable oxygen consumed catalytic green inerting system.
-
表 1 不同惰化时间所需抽吸气流量
Table 1. Required suction flow rate under different inerting time
惰化时间/min 抽吸气流量/(L·min-1) 载油率0% 载油率50% 载油率97% 5 6 160 2 400 256 10 3 100 1 400 172 15 2 070 1 030 137 20 1 550 826 115 表 2 飞行包线信息
Table 2. Flight envelope information
状态 轮挡时间/min 飞行高度/m 轮挡耗油/kg 滑出 7 0 189 起飞 2 0~457 630 爬升 29 457~12 000 4 992 巡航 755 12 000 67 987 下降 21 12 000~457 373 进场 6 457 240 滑入 5 0 135 表 3 双流量惰化模式下抽吸气流量
Table 3. Suction flow rate in dual-flow inerting mode
惰化时间/ min 载油率/ % 抽吸气流量/(L·min-1) 滑出、起飞、爬升、巡航阶段 下降、进场、滑入阶段 10 0 3 100 2 280 10 50 1 400 2 280 10 97 172 2 450 20 0 1 550 2 280 20 50 826 2 280 20 97 115 2 550 -
[1] MANATT S A. Fuel tank inerting system: US, 4556180[P]. 1985-12-03. [2] 刘小芳, 刘卫华. 飞机供氧和燃油箱惰化技术概况[J]. 北华航天工业学院学报, 2008, 18(3): 4-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7938.2008.03.002LIU X F, LIU W H. Outline of airborne oxygen supplied and fuel tanks inerted[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering, 2008, 18(3): 4-7(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7938.2008.03.002 [3] Fuel Tank Harmonization Working Group Task Group 1. Service history/fuel tank safety level assessment[R]. [S. l. ]: Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC), 1998. [4] 冯诗愚, 卢吉, 刘卫华, 等. 机载制氮系统中空纤维膜分离特性[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(6): 1332-1339. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201206020.htmFENG S Y, LU J, LIU W H, et al. Separation performance of hollow fiber membrane for on-board inerting gas generating system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(6): 1332-1339(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201206020.htm [5] LANGTON R, CLARK C, HEWITT M, et al. Aircraft fuel systems[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2010: 225-237. [6] ABRAMOWITZ A, BORIS P. Characterization of an oxygen/nitrogen permeable membrane system: DOT/FAA/AR-95/91[R]. [S. l. ]: FAA Report, 1996. [7] CAVAGE W M. The cost of implementing ground-based fuel tank inerting in the commercial fleet: DOT/FAA/AR-00/19[R]. [S. l. ]: FAA Report, 2000. [8] SUMMER S M. Cold ambient temperature effects on heated fuel tank vapor concentrations: DOT/FAA/AR-TN99/93[R]. [S. l. ]: FAA Report, 2000. [9] 王明波, 邵垒, 潘俊, 等. 耗氧型燃油箱惰化技术历史和现状[J]. 航空科学技术, 2016, 27(7): 1-7. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKKX201607002.htmWANG M B, SHAO L, PAN J, et al. History and current status of oxygen consumption based fuel tank inerting technology[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2016, 27(7): 1-7(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKKX201607002.htm [10] 刘夙春, 邱献双. 一种新型的飞机油箱催化惰化系统[J]. 航空科学技术, 2011(4): 27-29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5453.2011.04.009LIU S C, QIU X S. A new fuel tank catalytically inerting system[J]. Aeronautical Science & Technology, 2011(4): 27-29(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5453.2011.04.009 [11] LIMAYE S, KOENIG D. Catalytic reactive component reduction system and methods for the use thereof: US, 11/994801[P]. 2008-08-21. [12] MORRIS R, MILLER J, LIMAYE S. Fuel deoxygenation and aircraft thermal management: AIAA 2006-4027[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006. [13] WALKER S, JUNG W, ROBERTSON S. Demonstration of a novel catalyst based green on board inert gas generation system (GOBIGGS) for fuel tank inerting[C]//The American Helicopter Society 69th Annual Forum, 2013: 1-10. [14] 冯诗愚, 李超越, 邵垒, 等. 一种燃油箱绿色惰化系统地面惰化性能分析[J]. 航空动力学报, 2017, 32(2): 268-274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201702002.htmFENG S Y, LI C Y, SHAO L, et al. Analysis on ground-based inerting performance of a fuel tank green on-board inert gas generation system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2017, 32(2): 268-274(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI201702002.htm [15] FENG S Y, PENG X T, CHEN C, et al. Effect of air supplementation on the performance of an onboard catalytic inerting system[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 97(2): 1-8. [16] 邵垒. 飞机燃油箱耗氧型惰化技术理论和实验研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2018.SHAO L. Theoretical and experimental study of oxygen consumed inerting technology for aircraft fuel tank[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018(in Chinese). [17] 彭孝天, 冯诗愚, 周利彪, 等. 温度对耗氧型惰化系统产水性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(8): 1622-1627. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI202008007.htmPENG X T, FENG S Y, ZHOU L B, et al. Effect of temperature on water production performance of oxygen-consuming inerting system[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(8): 1622-1627(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI202008007.htm [18] 谢辉辉, 冯诗愚, 彭孝天, 等. 耗氧型惰化系统反应器性能理论研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(2): 2312-2319. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0117#viewType=AbstractXIE H H, FENG S Y, PENG X T, et al. Theoretical of reactor performance in oxygen consumption based inerting system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(2): 2312-2319(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0117#viewType=Abstract [19] FENG S Y, LI C Y, PENG X T, et al. Oxygen concentration variation in ullage of an inert aircraft fuel tank determined by the dissolved oxygen evolution[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(7): 1919-1928. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.12.020 [20] 王苏明, 冯诗愚, 李宗祺, 等. 燃油箱耗氧惰化与中空膜惰化的数值模拟及比较[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(5): 1032-1038. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0332#viewType=AbstractWANG S M, FENG S Y, LI Z Q, et al. Numerical simulation and comparison of oxygen consumption inerting and hollow membrane inerting in fuel tank[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(5): 1032-1038(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0332#viewType=Abstract [21] LIMAYE S, ROBERSTON S, KOENIG D, et al. Development of a"green"on-board inert gas generation system[C]//Proceedings of the 15th Triennial International Fire & Cabin Safety Research Conference, 2007. [22] 中国民用航空局. 中国民用航空规章第25部: 运输类飞机适航标准: CCAR-25-R4[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2011: 245-246.Civil Aviation Administration of China. Chinese civil aviation regulations. Part 25. Airworthiness standards for transport category aircraft: CCAR-25-R4[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2011: 245-246(in Chinese).