Numerical simulation of effect of background pressure on electric propulsion plume field
-
摘要:
真空舱内背景压强是电推力器地面试验过程中影响工作性能评估和羽流场参数诊断的重要参数。针对LIPS-200型离子推力器羽流场参数的数值仿真中采用的背景压强建立方法进行了仿真分析。仿真中采用混合粒子网格(PIC)方法和直接模拟蒙特卡罗(DSMC)方法处理羽流场中等离子体运动和粒子间碰撞,分别采用虚拟粒子和计算粒子建立压强的方式,对电推进羽流场进行了数值模拟,并与绝对真空环境进行对比分析。结果表明:背景压强的存在导致中性粒子和电荷交换离子数密度较绝对真空环境高1个量级以上。虚拟粒子可大幅提高计算效率,获得的流场中电荷交换离子分布与计算粒子结果相近,但中性粒子分布相差较大,虚拟粒子无法表征壁面及真空泵的影响。
-
关键词:
- 电推进 /
- 羽流 /
- 背景压力 /
- 粒子网络-直接模拟蒙特卡罗(PIC-DSMC)方法 /
- 数值模拟
Abstract:The background pressure in vacuum chamber is an important parameter that affects the performance evaluation and plume field parameter diagnosis of electric thruster during ground tests. In this paper, a simulation analysis was made on the background pressure establishment method used in the numerical simulation of the plume field parameters of LIPS-200 ion thruster. The hybrid particle in cell (PIC) method and the direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method were used to deal with plasma motion and particle collisions in plume field. The electric propulsion plume was numerically simulated by using virtual particles and computed particles respectively, and compared with the vacuum environment. The results show that the number densities of neutral particles and charge-exchange ions are more than one order of magnitude higher than those in the vacuum environment due to the existence of background pressure. The virtual particles can greatly improve the computational efficiency, and the charge-exchange ion distribution in the plume field obtained is similar to that of the computed particle. However, the neutral particle distribution is quite different, so the influence of the wall and vacuum pump cannot be characterized by virtual particles.
-
工作参数 数值 屏栅电压/V 1 000 束电流/A 0.8 阴极氙气流率/(mg·s-1) 0.14 放电室氙气流率/(mg·s-1) 1.1 中和器阴极流率/(mg·s-1) 0.14 粒子种类 流率/s-1 温度/K 速度/(m·s-1) Xe 5.69×1017 300 325 Xe+ 4.61×1018 46 400 38 313 Xe2+ 5.12×1017 46 400 54 183 表 3 背景压强处理方式对比的算例安排
Table 3. Case arrangement for comparison of background pressure simulation methods
算例 初始压强/mPa 边界处理 计算粒子 0 反射 虚拟粒子 0.25 自由边界 绝对真空环境 0 自由边界 -
[1] KAMHAWI H, HAAG T, HUANG W, et al. Performance, facility pressure effects, and stability characterization tests of NASA's 12.5-kW Hall effect rocket with magnetic shielding thruster[C]//52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2016: 4826. [2] NAKAYAMA Y, NAKAMURA M. Electric propulsion propellant flow within vacuum chamber[C]//34th International Electric Propulsion Conference, 2015: 2015-360. [3] NING Z X, CHU Y F, LIU X Y, et al. Effect of vacuum backpressure on discharge characteristics of hollow cathode[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2019, 21(12): 125402. doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/ab4364 [4] MACDONALD-TENENBAUM N, PRATT Q, NAKLES M, et al. Background pressure effects on ion velocity distributions in an SPT-100 Hall thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2019, 35(2): 1-10. [5] WALKER M L R, GALLIMORE A D. Neutral density map of Hall thruster plume expansion in a vacuum chamber[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2005, 76(5): 053509. doi: 10.1063/1.1915011 [6] CAI C P. A new gas kinetic model to analyze background flow effects on weak gaseous jet flows from electric propulsion devices[J]. Aerospace, 2017, 4(1): 5. doi: 10.3390/aerospace4010005 [7] FRIEMAN J D. Characterization of background neutral flows in vacuum test facilities and impacts on Hall effect thruster operation[D]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology, 2017: 21-33. [8] VANGILDER D B, BOYD I D, KEIDAR M. Particle simulations of a Hall thruster plume[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2000, 37(1): 129-136. doi: 10.2514/2.3536 [9] BOYD I D. A review of Hall thruster plume modeling[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38(3): 381-387. doi: 10.2514/2.3695 [10] CHOI Y, KEIDAR M, BOYD I D. Particle simulation of plume flows from an anode-layer Hall thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24(3): 554-561. doi: 10.2514/1.28384 [11] 李小平, 张天平, 贾艳辉, 等. 真空舱背景压力对离子推力器栅极系统工作性能影响的数值模拟[J]. 真空与低温, 2012, 18(2): 71-76. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKDW201202004.htmLI X P, ZHANG T P, JIA Y H, et al. Numerical simulation of the effect of vacuum facility background pressure on ion thruster grid system work performance[J]. Vacuum & Cryogenics, 2012, 18(2): 71-76(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKDW201202004.htm [12] JIAN H H, CHU Y C, CAO H J, et al. Three-dimensional IFE-PIC numerical simulation of background pressure 's effect on accelerator grid impingement current for ion optics[J]. Vacuum, 2015, 116: 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.03.011 [13] KORKUT B, LEVIN D A, TUMUKLU O. Simulations of ion thruster plumes in ground facilities using adaptive mesh refinement[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2017, 33(3): 681-696. doi: 10.2514/1.B35958 [14] 王军伟, 张磊, 龚洁, 等. 基于粒子模拟的舱内布局对霍尔推进器真空羽流的影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(9): 1988-1994. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI202009021.htmWANG J W, ZHANG L, GONG J, et al. Effect of cabin layout on vacuum plume of Hall thruster based on particle simulation[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(9): 1988-1994(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKDI202009021.htm [15] ZHENG H R, CAI G B, WANG H Y, et al. Three-dimensional particle simulation of ion thruster plume flows with EX-PWS[J]. Plasma Science and Technology, 2018, 20(10): 105501. doi: 10.1088/2058-6272/aad5da [16] CAI G B, ZHENG H R, LIU L H, et al. Three-dimensional particle simulation of ion thruster plume impingement[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2018, 151: 645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.007 [17] BIRD G A. Molecular gas dynamics and the direct simulation of gas flows[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994. [18] DEBOER P C T. Electric probe measurements in the plume of an ion thruster[J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 1996, 12(1): 95-104. doi: 10.2514/3.23996 [19] DALGARNO A, WILLIAMS A. The mobilities of ions in unlike gases[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences, 1958, 250(982): 411-425. [20] RAPP D, FRANCIS W E. Charge exchange between gaseous ions and atoms[J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1962, 37(11): 2631-2645. doi: 10.1063/1.1733066 [21] 郑茂繁, 江豪成, 顾左, 等. 20 cm氙离子推力器3 000 h寿命实验[J]. 航天器环境工程, 2009, 26(4): 374-377. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTHJ200904028.htmZHENG M F, JIANG H C, GU Z, et al. 3 000 h life test of 20 cm xenon ion thruster[J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2009, 26(4): 374-377(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HTHJ200904028.htm [22] 张建华, 李晶华, 尤凤仪, 等. 离子推力器羽流热效应仿真分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(10): 2028-2034. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0802ZHANG J H, LI J H, YOU F Y, et al. Simulation analysis of ion thruster plume thermal effect[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(10): 2028-2034(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0802 [23] 王文龙, 周建平, 蔡国飙. 内置式深冷泵抽速计算及数值模拟研究[J]. 真空科学与技术学报, 2012, 32(5): 85-89. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKKX201205018.htmWANG W L, ZHOU J P, CAI G B. Direct simulation Monte Carlo study of pumping speed of internal cryogenic fins[J]. Chinese Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, 2012, 32(5): 85-89(in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZKKX201205018.htm -