Hydroplaning behavior of aircraft wheel group and additional resistance due to accumulated water on pavement
-
摘要:
针对飞机在不同滑行状态与道面积水条件下的轮组滑水行为特征差异问题，开展道面积水附加阻力研究，改进基于道面对轮胎竖向支撑力指标的临界滑水状态判定条件。以空客A320机型主起落架为研究对象，建立双轮轮组-积水道面流固耦合滑水分析模型，对道面积水附加阻力影响因素进行规律分析。结果表明：积水附加阻力在轮胎临界滑水状态达到最大，所得临界滑水速度与NASA公式计算结果相差小于5%，且在滑水过后持续影响滑行状态，较道面支撑力更适合作为滑水分析指标；飞机着陆时轮胎高速接地可发生瞬时滑水，同等参数条件下道面积水阻力始终低于起飞过程，着陆阶段临界滑水速度较起飞阶段低8.3%~10.6%，着陆阶段飞机滑水风险更高，符合事故统计规律；轮辙变形改变道面积水条件并引起轮组内部滑水过程时空差异；仅对平整道面理想积水情况，道面积水阻力轮组系数可近似按轮胎数量计算，有轮辙道面条件下双轮轮组系数中位数低于2.0，造成着陆减速滑行过程延长。
Abstract:Aiming at the difference of hydroplaning behavior characteristics of aircraft wheel group during different taxiing processes and under various accumulated water conditions, the additional resistance of accumulated water is studied in this paper. The critical judgment index of hydroplaning traditionally based on the vertical supporting force on the tire print is improved.The main landing gear of Airbus A320 model is studied as an example. A fluid-solid coupling model of two-wheel configuration running on the pavement surface with accumulated water is established for hydroplaning analysis. Regular analysis of influence factors related to additional resistance is then carried out. Results show that the additional resistance reaches its maximum value at the critical condition of tire hydroplaning. The difference of the hydroplaning speed between the numerical simulation and NASA’s equation calculation is less than 5%. As compared with the supporting force, the additional resistance of accumulated water is considered to be more suitable for hydroplaning analysis, which may continuously affect the taxing process of aircraft after the critical state. Instantaneous hydroplaning may occur when aircraft tires land on the pavement at a rather high speed. The water resistance during landing is smaller than that during take-off. The critical hydroplaning speed during landing is reduced by 8.3%~10.6% as compared with that during take-off. Therefore, the risk of aircraft hydroplaning during landing is increased, which is in good accordance with the rules of accidental statistics. The distribution of accumulated water is affected by rut deformation of the pavement surface, which may lead to temporal and spatial differences of hydroplaning development within the wheel group.The number of tires can be approximately taken as the wheel group coefficient of water resistance with an idealized water distribution. The median value of such a coefficient is smaller than 2.0 for wheel groups running on the rut pavement surface. Thus, the overall deceleration of landing aircraft can be postponed.
-
图 5 飞机轮组滑水仿真模型
Figure 5. Simulation model of hydroplaning analysis of aircraft landing gears
图 7 着陆滑行过程道面积水分布
Figure 7. Distribution of accumulated water on pavement surface during landing
图 8 不同滑行状态下道面积水阻力
Figure 8. Drag force of accumulated water on pavement surface under different taxing conditions
图 10 不同加载荷位时道面积水阻力
Figure 10. Drag force of accumulated water on pavement surface at different loading positions
图 11 轮组系数随滑行速度的变化曲线
Figure 11. Variation cures of wheel configuration coefficient versus taxing speed
指标 数值 橡胶正定常数C10 $9.9 \times {10^6}$ 橡胶正定常数C01 $8.8 \times {10^6}$ 橡胶不可压缩系数D1 $1.0 \times {10^{ - 7}}$ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同加载荷位临界滑水速度比较
Table 2. Comparison of hydroplaning speed at different loading positions
测点 左轮vP/
（km·h−1）右轮vP/
（km·h−1）左右轮
相差/%与平整道面相差
（较低一侧）/%平整道面 229.7 229.7 0.0 0.0 A1加载荷位 210.7 203.6 3.5 12.8 A2加载荷位 206.8 218.5 5.7 10.0 A3加载荷位 216.4 214.1 1.1 6.8
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] GILBERTO L M: Safety report 2019[EB/OL]. (2021-05-18) [2021-07-10].https://aviation-safety.net/. [2] HORNE W B, DREHER R C. Phenomena of pneumatic tire hydroplaning: NASA TN D-2056[R]. Washington, D. C.: NASA, 1963: 3-17. [3] ONG G P, FWA T F. Wet-pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: Modeling[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2007, 133(10): 590-598. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:10(590) [4] ONG P, FWA T F. Prediction of wet-pavement skid resistance and hydroplaning potential[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2005(1): 160-171. doi: 10.3141/2005-17 [5] FWA T F, ONG G P. Wet-pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: Analysis[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 182-190. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2008)134:5(182) [6] TANG T, ANUPAM K, KASBERGEN C, et al. A finite element study of rain intensity on skid resistance for permeable asphalt concrete mixes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 220: 464-475. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.185 [7] SRIRANGAM S K, ANUPAM K, SCARPAS A, et al. Hydroplaning of rolling tires under different operating conditions[C]//Airfield and Highway Pavement 2013. Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013: 561-572. [8] 刘修宇, 曹青青, 朱晟泽, 等. 沥青混凝土路面轮胎临界滑水速度数值模拟[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1020-1025. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.05.028LIU X Y, CAO Q Q, ZHU S Z, et al. Numerical simulation of tire critical hydroplaning speed on asphalt pavement[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science edition), 2017, 47(5): 1020-1025(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2017.05.028 [9] 黄晓明, 刘修宇, 曹青青, 等. 积水路面轮胎部分滑水数值模拟[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 45(9): 113-121. doi: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2018.09.013HUANG X M, LIU X Y, CAO Q Q, et al. Numerical simulation of tire partial hydroplaning on flooded pavement[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Science), 2018, 45(9): 113-121(in Chinese). doi: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2018.09.013 [10] 郑彬双, 朱晟泽, 程永振, 等. 基于轮胎滑水模型的轮胎-沥青路面附着特性影响因素分析[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(4): 719-725. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.04.019ZHENG B S, ZHU S Z, CHENG Y Z, et al. Analysis on influence factors of adhesion characteristic of tire-asphalt pavement based on tire hydroplaning model[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science edition), 2018, 48(4): 719-725(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2018.04.019 [11] 闫珅. 大型飞机污染跑道起降性能和飞行操作适航标准研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.YAN S. Study on airworthiness standards for takeoff and landing performance and flight operations of large aircraft on contaminated runway[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019 (in Chinese). [12] 李岳, 蔡靖, 宗一鸣. 湿滑道面飞机轮胎临界滑水速度数值仿真[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2017, 17(5): 90-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.05.009LI Y, CAI J, ZONG Y M. Numerical simulation of critical hydroplaning speed of aircraft tire under wet pavement condition[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2017, 17(5): 90-101(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2017.05.009 [13] FWA T F, PASINDU H R, ONG G P. Critical rut depth for pavement maintenance based on vehicle skidding and hydroplaning consideration[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2012, 138(4): 423-429. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000336 [14] DAUGHERTY R H, STUBBS S M. Measurements of flow rate and trajectory of aircraft tire-generated water spray: NASA-TP-2718[R]. Washington, D. C. : NASA, 1987: 15-20. [15] GIESBERTS M K H. Test and evaluation of precipitation drag on an aircraft caused by snow and standing water on a runway: NLR-TP-2001-490[R]. Harrogate: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, 2001: 1-25. [16] 徐长群, 陶超. 大型客机积水跑道起降附加阻力评估[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2018(1): 98-103. doi: 10.19416/j.cnki.1674-9804.2018.01.018XU C Q, TAO C. Additional drag assessment on standing water runways for large civil aircraft[J]. Civil Aircraft Design and Research, 2018(1): 98-103(in Chinese). doi: 10.19416/j.cnki.1674-9804.2018.01.018 [17] OH C W, KIM T W, JEONG H Y, et al. Hydroplaning simulation for a straight-grooved tire by using FDM, FEM and an asymptotic method[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2008, 22(1): 34-40. doi: 10.1007/s12206-007-1004-y [18] 蔡靖, 李岳, 宗一鸣. 湿滑道面飞机轮胎临界滑水速度计算方法比较[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 241-252.CAI J, LI Y, ZONG Y M. Comparison of prediction methods for critical hydroplaning speed of aircraft tire on wet pavement[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(7): 241-252(in Chinese). [19] 张恒. 轮胎与湿滑道面相互作用下的飞机滑水行为研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2018.ZHANG H. Study on the hydroplaning behavior of aircraft under the interaction of tire and wet pavement[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2018 (in Chinese). [20] LIA R, HECTOR D. FAA airport technology research & development branch[EB/OL]. (2020-04-12)[2021-07-16]. https://www.airporttech.tc.faa.gov/Airport-Pavement/National-Airport-Pavement-Test-Facility/Construction-Cycles/Construction-Cycle-5. [21] 许诤. 考虑道面平整度的飞机轮胎滑水安全问题研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2019.XU Z. Safety research of hydroplaning of aircraft tire considering roughness quality of pavement[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2019 (in Chinese). [22] 朱林培. 轮胎滑水特性仿真分析与研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2010.ZHU L P. Numerical investigation of hydroplaning characteristics of patterned tire[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2010 (in Chinese). [23] 张辉. 湿滑路面上汽车轮胎滑水性能研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2018.ZHANG H. Study on hydroplaning performance of vehicle tire on wet pavement[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Technology, 2018 (in Chinese). [24] 宗一鸣. 湿滑道面条件下轮胎力学行为与飞机着陆安全问题研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2017.ZONG Y M. Study on the mechanical properties of aircraft tire and safety problem in landing on wet-pavement[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2017 (in Chinese). [25] ES G W H, ROELEN A L C, KRUIJSEN E A C, et al. Safety aspects of aircraft performance on wet and contaminated runways[C]//10th European Aviation Safety Seminar. Amsterdam: National Aerospace Laboratory, 1998: 3-21. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 170
- HTML全文浏览量: 51
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
