地空导弹破片式打击军机的瞄准点选择方法

侯鹏; 裴扬; 张睿文; 葛玉雪; 白春玉; 张宇

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0467

地空导弹破片式打击军机的瞄准点选择方法

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0467

侯鹏¹,
裴扬¹,
张睿文²,
葛玉雪^1, ,,
白春玉³,
张宇³

1.
西北工业大学航空学院，西安 710072
2.
西安航天动力研究所液体火箭发动机技术重点实验室，西安 710100
3.
中国飞机强度研究所结构冲击动力学航空科技重点实验室，西安 710065

基金项目: 航空科学基金(20185153032)

详细信息

通讯作者:
E-mail：ge_yuxue@nwpu.edu.cn

中图分类号: V221；TJ761
计量
- 文章访问数: 361
- HTML全文浏览量: 119
- PDF下载量: 44
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-08-16
- 录用日期: 2021-11-26
- 网络出版日期: 2021-12-29
- 整期出版日期: 2023-06-30

Selection method of aim point for surface-to-air missile fragment against military aircraft

1.
School of Aeronautics，Northwestern Polytechnical University，Xi’an 710072，China
2.
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Liquid Rocket Engines，Xi’an Aerospace Propulsion Institute，Xi’an 710100，China
3.
Aviation Key Laboratory of Technology and Science on Structure Impact Dynamics， AVIC Aircraft Strength Research Institute，Xi’an 710065，China

Funds: Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20185153032)

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail：ge_yuxue@nwpu.edu.cn

摘要

摘要:
为提高红外成像制导导弹的破片式战斗部打击军用飞机的毁伤效能，以典型对地作战飞机为研究对象，提出2种情况下破片式战斗部对飞机的瞄准点选择方法。建立对地作战飞机易损性模型和战斗部破片飞散模型，以此为基础采用射击线法计算作战飞机的毁伤概率。对于不考虑引信探测过程的情况，建立基于导弹制导误差的战斗部毁伤效能指标，用于选择给定打击方向下的瞄准点；对于考虑引信探测过程的情况，根据引信探测仿真和导弹制导误差确定炸点位置，采用蒙特卡罗法计算各炸点毁伤概率均值，进而获得各打击方向下的最优瞄准点。通过仿真算例对红外制导地空导弹打击下的瞄准点选择方法进行分析研究，结果表明：不考虑引信探测过程的瞄准点选择方法得到的最优瞄准点分布在机体边缘，而考虑引信探测过程的瞄准点选择方法得到的最优瞄准点会向机体中心偏移。
- 飞行器设计 /
- 对地作战飞机 /
- 毁伤评估 /
- 毁伤概率 /
- 瞄准点
Abstract:
To improve the damage efficiency of infrared imaging guided missile fragment warhead against military aircraft, a typical air-to-ground combat aircraft is taken as the research object, and the aim point selection method of fragmentation warhead against combat aircraft in two case is proposed. Based on the vulnerability model and warhead fragment dispersion model of aircraft, the damage probability of aircraft is calculated by using shot line method. For the case that the fuze detection process is not considered, the warhead damage efficiency index based on missile guidance error is established to select the aim point under the given attack direction. For the case that the fuze detection process is considered, the location of the explosion point is determined according to the fuze simulation and missile guidance error. Monte Carlo method is used to calculate the average damage probability of each explosion point, and then the optimal aim point in each attack direction is obtained. The aim point selection method under the attack of infrared guided surface-to-air missile is analyzed and studied through the simulation example. The results indicate that the optimal distribution of aim point is on the edge of the body when the case that the fuze detection process is ignored, and the optimal aiming point will be offset to the body center when the process fuze detection is considered.
- aircraft design /
- combat aircraft /
- damage evaluation /
- damage probability /
- aim point

HTML全文

图 1 物理模型

Figure 1. Physical model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 给定等级下的关键部件分布

Figure 2. Distribution of critical components at given level

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 破片飞散模型

Figure 3. Fragment dispersion model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 破片与飞机的交会

Figure 4. Engagement of fragment and aircraft

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 破片穿透飞机部件示意图

Figure 5. Illustration of fragments penetrating aircraft components

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 导弹相对于飞机的位置及姿态

Figure 6. Position and attitude of missile relative to aircraft

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 毁伤效能指标计算的炸点位置图

Figure 7. Explosion location map of damage efficiency index calculation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 基于毁伤效能的瞄准点选择方法流程

Figure 8. Flow chart of aim point selection method based on damage efficiency

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 引信探测仿真示意图

Figure 9. Schematic diagram of fuze detection simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 基本计算参数设置

Figure 10. Basic parameter setting

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 脱靶面内的炸点抽样

Figure 11. Sampling of explosion locations within miss flat

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 毁伤概率云图(打击方向：2；瞄准点：3)

Figure 12. Damage probability map (Directions:2; aim point:3)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 不同瞄准点下的毁伤效能指标值

Figure 13. Value of damage efficiency index at different aim points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 不同瞄准点下的毁伤概率

Figure 14. Damage probability at different aim points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 基于引信探测仿真的毁伤概率云图(B级)

Figure 15. Damage probability map based on fuze detection simulation (Level-B)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(28)

[1]	毛亮, 姜春兰, 王超, 等. 基于改进遗传算法的破片杀伤战斗部优化设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(3): 457-462. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.03.012 MAO L, JIANG C L, WANG C, et al. Optimization design method of fragmenting warfare based on improved genetic algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(3): 457-462(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.03.012
[2]	王国庆, 应国淼, 尤春涛. 破片式战斗部对飞机目标的杀伤方法[J]. 四川兵工学报, 2009, 30(5): 28-32. WANG G Q, YING G M, YOU C T. Killing method of fragment warhead to aircraft target[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2009, 30(5): 28-32(in Chinese).
[3]	李萍, 方喜波, 黄志理. 基于红外成像制导的末端瞄准点选择技术[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(5): 1131-1136. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2013.05.004 LI P, FANG X B, HUANG Z L. Aim point selecting algorithm for endgame based on infrared imaging guidance[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2013, 42(5): 1131-1136(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2013.05.004
[4]	李丽娟, 黄士科, 刘珂. 一种飞机目标的瞄准点选择方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2007, 36(1): 123-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2007.01.030 LI L J, HUANG S K, LIU K. Aimpoint selection method of airplane target[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2007, 36(1): 123-126(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2276.2007.01.030
[5]	李才伦. 导弹对目标的命中部位设计技术[J]. 战术导弹技术, 1999(4): 6-11. doi: 10.16358/j.issn.1009-1300.1999.04.005 LI C L. Design techniques of hit-point on target for guided missile[J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 1999(4): 6-11(in Chinese). doi: 10.16358/j.issn.1009-1300.1999.04.005
[6]	张凯, 刘昊, 杨曦, 等. 基于关键点检测网络的空中红外目标要害部位识别算法[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2020, 38(6): 1154-1162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2020.06.003 ZHANG K, LIU H, YANG X, et al. Identification algorithm based on key-point detection network for vital parts of infrared aerial target[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2020, 38(6): 1154-1162(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2020.06.003
[7]	徐梓熙, 刘彦, 闫俊伯, 等. 不同破片对典型飞机目标的毁伤效应[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(S2): 63-68. XU Z X, LIU Y, YAN J B, et al. Experimental investigation on the damage of aircraft subjected to different fragments loading[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(S2): 63-68(in Chinese).
[8]	翟成林, 陈小伟. 导弹战斗部打击下目标毁伤评估的研究进展[J]. 含能材料, 2021, 29(2): 166-180. doi: 10.11943/CJEM2020316 ZHAI C L, CHEN X W. A review on damage assessment of target hit by missile warhead[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021, 29(2): 166-180(in Chinese). doi: 10.11943/CJEM2020316
[9]	KONOKMAN H E, KAYRAN A, KAYA M. Aircraft vulnerability assessment against fragmentation warhead[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 67: 215-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.04.005
[10]	KONOKMAN H E, KAYRAN A, KAYA M. Analysis of aircraft survivability against fragmenting warhead threat[C]//55th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston: AIAA, 2014: 1-12.
[11]	PEI Y, SONG B F. Aircraft vulnerable-area decomposition method in the overlapping region of components[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2006, 43(4): 1138-1144. doi: 10.2514/1.18041
[12]	LI J, YANG W, ZHANG Y G, et al. Aircraft vulnerability modeling and computation methods based on product structure and CATIA[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2013, 26(2): 334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2013.02.010
[13]	卢军民, 李向东, 毛东方. 破片式战斗部作用下固定翼飞机的易损性评估[J]. 南京理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(6): 695-700. LU J M, LI X D, MAO D F. Fixed wing aircraft vulnerability assessment under fragmentation warhead[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2008, 32(6): 695-700(in Chinese).
[14]	聂鹏, 曹兵. 破片式战斗部对空中飞机的毁伤建模与仿真[J]. 指挥控制与仿真, 2012, 34(6): 80-83. NIE P, CAO B. Damage calculation and simulation research on fragment to air plane[J]. Command Control & Simulation, 2012, 34(6): 80-83(in Chinese).
[15]	高睿源, 范瀚阳, 范洪明. 飞机类目标毁伤效果评估方法研究[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2019, 44(8): 136-140. GAO R Y, FAN H Y, FAN H M. Research on damage effect assessment method of aircraft targets[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2019, 44(8): 136-140(in Chinese).
[16]	赵宏伟, 陈云俊. 杀爆战斗部打击预警机引战配合效果分析[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2019, 39(4): 131-134. doi: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2019.04.031 ZHAO H W, CHEN Y J. Analysis of fragment warhead coordinate efficiency of early warning airplane[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2019, 39(4): 131-134(in Chinese). doi: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2019.04.031
[17]	张新伟, 郝陈朋, 宇灿. 空空导弹战斗部毁伤效能评估技术研究[J]. 航空兵器, 2019, 26(2): 45-49. doi: 10.12132/ISSN.1673-5048.2018.0113 ZHANG X W, HAO C P, YU C. Research on damage effectiveness evaluation of air-to-air missile warhead[J]. Aero Weaponry, 2019, 26(2): 45-49(in Chinese). doi: 10.12132/ISSN.1673-5048.2018.0113
[18]	裴扬, 宋笔锋, 石帅. 飞机作战生存力分析方法研究进展与挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1): 216-234. PEI Y, SONG B F, SHI S. Analysis method of aircraft combat survivability: Progress and challenge[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1): 216-234(in Chinese).
[19]	BALL R E. The fundamentals of aircraft combat survivability analysis and design[M]. 2nd ed. Reston: AIAA, 2003: 603-738.
[20]	胡诤哲, 李向东, 周兰伟, 等. 武装直升机在杀爆弹打击下的易损性及防护策略[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(6): 1214-1220. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0427 HU Z Z, LI X D, ZHOU L W, et al. Vulnerability and defense strategy for gunship against HE munition[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(6): 1214-1220(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0427
[21]	李向东, 杜忠华. 目标易损性[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2013: 105-106. LI X D, DU Z H. Target vulnerability[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2013: 105-106 (in Chinese).
[22]	韩璐, 韩庆. 飞机在模拟混合破片威力场打击下的易损性计算[J]. 航空工程进展, 2014, 5(4): 455-462. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8190.2014.04.008 HAN L, HAN Q. Calculation on the vulnerability of aircraft from a simulation mixed fragment warhead[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2014, 5(4): 455-462(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8190.2014.04.008
[23]	卢军民. 固定翼飞机在破片式战斗部作用下易损性评估及仿真研究[D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2006: 44-45. LU J M. Vulnerability evaluation and simulation study of fixed-wing aircraft under the action of fragment warhead[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2006: 44-45 (in Chinese) .
[24]	司凯, 李向东, 郭超, 等. 破片式战斗部对飞机类目标毁伤评估方法研究[J]. 弹道学报, 2017, 29(4): 52-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-499X.2017.04.009 SI K, LI X D, GUO C, et al. Research on damage assessment method of fragmentation warhead against airplane targets[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2017, 29(4): 52-57(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-499X.2017.04.009
[25]	QIAN L X, LIU T, ZHANG S Q, et al. Fragment shot-line model for air-defence warhead[J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2000, 25(2): 92-98. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4087(200004)25:2<92::AID-PREP92>3.0.CO;2-7
[26]	杨云斌, 卢永刚, 周岩. 半穿甲战斗部集成设计方法研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2008, 28(4): 86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2008.04.026 YANG Y B, LU Y G, ZHOU Y. Study on integrated design method for semi-armor-piercing warhead[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2008, 28(4): 86-89(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2008.04.026
[27]	周智炫, 黄洁, 任磊生, 等. 战场目标易损性分析仿真软件的开发与应用[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2014, 26(2): 464-469. doi: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2014.02.038 ZHOU Z X, HUANG J, REN L S, et al. Development and application of battlefield target vulnerability analysis simulation software[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2014, 26(2): 464-469(in Chinese). doi: 10.16182/j.cnki.joss.2014.02.038
[28]	陈材, 石全, 尤志锋, 等. 基于功能损伤的装备有效毁伤幅员仿真方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 1-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.01.001 CHEN C, SHI Q, YOU Z F, et al. Research on simulation method of effective damage area of equipment based on functional damage[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(1): 1-12(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.01.001