民用飞机迫降后不利姿态应急撤离实验研究

封文春; 张桐; 李伟

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0483

民用飞机迫降后不利姿态应急撤离实验研究

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2021.0483

封文春^1, ,,
张桐²,
李伟¹

1.
航空工业第一飞机设计研究院机电系统设计研究所，西安 710089
2.
北京航空航天大学宇航学院，北京 100191

基金项目: 工信部民机预研专项(MJ-2016-F-11)

详细信息

通讯作者:
E-mail：chunfeng@buaa.edu.cn

中图分类号: V233⁺.2；TP319.9
计量
- 文章访问数: 234
- HTML全文浏览量: 46
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-08-23
- 录用日期: 2021-10-22
- 网络出版日期: 2021-12-27
- 整期出版日期: 2023-07-31

Experimental study on adverse attitude emergency evacuation of civil aircraft after crash landing

1.
Institute of Electromechanical Systems，The First Aircraft Institute of AVIC， Xi’an 710089，China
2.
School of Astronautics，Beihang University，Beijing 100191， China

Funds: Civil Aircraft Pre-study of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MJ-2016-F-11)

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail：chunfeng@buaa.edu.cn

摘要

摘要:
为研究飞机迫降后不利姿态对应急撤离的影响，基于动态客舱应急撤离实验环境，开展了200多人次的个体及群体应急撤离实验，按照自由撤离模式和快速撤离模式，分析了不利姿态下座椅段、过道区域个体撤离速度的变化规律，建立了个体平均速度衰减比模型。实验表明：迫降后的不利姿态对群体撤离时间、人员密度和前向距离均有一定影响。横滚姿态下，群体撤离速度衰减比在5°时为0.948，10°时为0.859，随横滚角增大而减小；俯仰姿态下，在−5°俯角下群体中个体撤离速度均呈现出加速的效果，末位速度达到1.35 m/s，次序越靠后撤离速度衰减比越大，−10°时，群体中个体运动呈现两面性，撤离速度与次序呈反比。通过实验揭示了迫降后不利姿态应急撤离客舱内个体运动及群体撤离的变化规律，为民用飞机应急撤离仿真提供了重要参考数据。
- 应急撤离 /
- 迫降 /
- 不利姿态 /
- 应急撤离实验 /
- 撤离速度
Abstract:
Based on dynamic emergency evacuation test environment, the effects of adverse attitude on emergency evacuation were studied and more than two hundred tests, including individual evacuation and group evacuation tests, were implemented. Then the average evacuation speed of individuals at seat and aisle area was analyzed according to free walk and quick evacuation model, with the results of which models of individual average speed attenuation ratio was established. The tests show that the adverse attitude of landing has effects on evacuation time, personnel density and forward distance. Under roll condition, the speed attenuation ratio is 0.948 and 0.859 at 5 degrees and 10 degrees, respectively, declining with the increase of the roll angle. Under pitch condition, the effects of acceleration appears at −5 degrees and the evacuation speed of the last person is 1.35 meter per second, with speed attenuation ratio increasing with the evacuation sequence; while at −10 degrees, the individual movement displays two-sidedness, with the speed in inverse proportion with the evacuation sequence. The test results reveal the movement patterns of the individual and group evacuation under adverse attitude landing condition and provides important reference data for evacuation simulation of civil aircraft.
- emergency evacuation /
- crash landing /
- adverse attitude /
- emergency evacuation test /
- evacuation speed

HTML全文

图 1 实验环境结构

Figure 1. Structure of test environment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验环境实物图

Figure 2. Picture of test environment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 客舱内部环境

Figure 3. Internal environment of cabin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 实验区布置示意图

Figure 4. Layout of test area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 动态群体撤离实验布置示意图

Figure 5. Arrangement of dynamic group evacuation test

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 进入和离开实验测量区的实验对象累计图

Figure 6. Aggregate test objects entering and leaving test area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同区域个体撤离速度的分布情况

Figure 7. Distribution of individual walk speed in different area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 快速撤离模式下不同性别个体撤离速度

Figure 8. Different sex evacuation speed at quick evacuation model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 个体撤离速度随横滚角变化统计

Figure 9. Individual evacuation speed in relation to roll angle change

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 个体撤离速度随俯仰角的变化统计

Figure 10. Individual evacuation speed in relation to pitch angle change

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同姿态下平均个体撤离速度衰减比

Figure 11. Average individual evacuation speed attenuation ratio at different attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同撤离次序个体平均撤离速度分布

Figure 12. Individual average evacuation speed distribution in different sequence

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 横滚姿态下平均撤离速度及其速度衰减比

Figure 13. Average evacuation speed and speed attenuation ration at roll attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 俯仰姿态下平均撤离速度及其速度衰减比

Figure 14. Average evacuation speed and speed attenuation ratio at pitch attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 不利姿态下群体撤离时间统计

Figure 15. Group evacuation time at adverse attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 横滚姿态下的人员密度-撤离速度基本图

Figure 16. Personnel density and evacuation speed at roll attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 俯仰姿态下人员密度-撤离速度基本图

Figure 17. Personnel density and evacuation speed at pitch attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 不利姿态下撤离速度与前向距离的关系

Figure 18. Relation between evacuation speed and distance headway at adverse attitude

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 A330-200各种不利姿态角度

Table 1. Adverse attitude angle of A330-200

序号	姿态	俯仰角/(°)	横滚角/(°)
1	所有起落架放下	−1.25	0
2	双主起落架折断	+3.25	0
3	前起落架折断	−8.65	0
4	所有起落架折断	+2.48	0
5	前起及单个主起落架折断	+4.31	±10.25
6	机尾过重	+12.9	0

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不利姿态下的基准撤离速度

Table 2. Reference evacuation speed under adverse attitude condition m/s

模式	性别	座椅段	直线段	全程
快速撤离	男	0.81	3.08	2.01
快速撤离	女	0.67	2.70	1.80
自由撤离		0.53	1.49	1.14

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	XUE Z, BLOEBAUM C. A particle swarm optimization based aircraft evacuation simulation model-VacateAir: AIAA 2008-180[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2008.
[2]	National Transportation Safety Board. Emergency evacuation of commercial airplanes: NTSB/SS-00/01[R]. Washington, D. C. : NTSB, 2000.
[3]	YU H C, YANG H H. Cabin safety and emergency evacuation: Passenger experience of flight CI-120 accident [J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2011, 43(3): 1049-1055.
[4]	DENG X Q. An aircraft evacuation simulation baseline using DES for passenger path planning[D]. Daytona Beach: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, 2016: 12-15.
[5]	VINUEZA V, MARÍA F, ZHOU K, et al. Cerebellar control of gait and interlimb coordination[J]. Brain Structure and Function, 2015, 220(6): 3513-3536. doi: 10.1007/s00429-014-0870-1
[6]	Interstate Aviation Committee. RRJ-95B RA-89098 interim report [R]. Moscow: Interstate Aviation Committee, 2019: 6-7.
[7]	SUN J, GU Y, LI C, et al. An experimental study on individual walking speed during ship evacuation with the combined effect of heeling and trim[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 166: 396-403. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.10.008
[8]	SUN J, LU S, LO S, et al. Moving characteristics of single file passengers considering the effect of ship trim and heeling[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 490: 476-487. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.08.031
[9]	彭浩轩, 刘小川, 白春玉, 等. 民机应急撤离实验与仿真研究进展[J]. 航空工程进展, 2020, 11(6): 759-766. doi: 10.16615/j.cnki.1674-8190.2020.06.001 PENG H X, LIU X C, BAI C Y, et al. Advances in experiment and simulation of civil aircraft emergency evacuation[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2020, 11(6): 759-766(in Chinese). doi: 10.16615/j.cnki.1674-8190.2020.06.001
[10]	HWANG K I. An experiment on walking speeds of freshmen unexperienced in shipboard life on a passenger ship[J]. Journal of Navigation and Port Research, 2013, 37(3): 239-244. doi: 10.5394/KINPR.2013.37.3.239
[11]	KIM H T, LEE D K, PARK J, et al. The effect on the mobility of evacuating passengers in ship with regard to list and motion[J]. IE Interfaces, 2004, 17(1): 22-32.
[12]	YOSHIKDA K, MURAYAMA M, ITAKAKI T. Study on evacuation of escape route in passenger in passenger ships by evacuation simulation and full-scale trials[J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1999, 1999(186): 581-589. doi: 10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1999.186_581
[13]	SHI X, YE Z, SHIWAKOTI N, et al. Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopiduic and microscopic analysis[J]. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 95: 405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.009
[14]	ZHANG J, KLINGSCH W, SCHADSCHNEIDER A, et al. Transitions in pedestrian fundamental diagrams of straight corridors and T-junctions[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics:Theory and Experiment, 2011, 2011(6): P06004.
[15]	ZHANG T, ZHANG X, HUANG S, et al. Collective behavior of mice passing through an exit under panic[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2018, 496: 233-242. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.055
[16]	SHAH J, JOSHI G J, PARIDA P. Behavioral characteristics of pedestrian flow on stairway at railway station[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 104: 688-697. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.163
[17]	张一山, 余江. 民航飞机擦机尾的风险防控与分析[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2021, 32(1): 9-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4288.2021.01.003 ZHANF Y S, YU J. Risk control and analysis of civil aircraft tail strike[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2021, 32(1): 9-13(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4288.2021.01.003
[18]	JOHN A, SCHADSCHNEIDER A, CHOWDHURY D, et al. Trafficlike collective movement of ants on trails: Absence of jammed phase[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 102(10): 297-300.
[19]	STEFFEN B, SEYFRIED A. Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010, 389(9): 1902-1910.
[20]	HUANG S, ZHANG T, SIUMING L, et al. Experimental study of individual and single-file pedestrian movement in narrow seat aisle[J]. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 509: 1023-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.06.079
[21]	CHEN J, JIAN M, LO S. Modelling pedestrian evacuation movement on a swaying ship[EB/OL]. (2015-10-15)[2021-08-01]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.04686v1.
[22]	JELIC A, APPERT R C, LEMERCIER S, et al. Properties of pedestrians walking in line: Fundamental diagrams[J]. Physical Review E: Statistical Nonlinear & Soft Matter Physics, 2012, 85(3): 036111.
[23]	CHATTARAJ U, SEYFRIED A, CHAKROBORTY P, et al. Modelling single file pedestrian motion across cultures[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 104: 698-707.