Numerical study of wing gust response alleviation based on camber morphing trailing edge
-
摘要:
针对带有变弯度后缘的机翼建立了阵风响应分析的数学模型，并开展了阵风响应减缓的仿真研究。采用计算流体力学（CFD）方法计算变弯度后缘给定动态偏转运动下的广义非定常气动力，并基于状态观测器法辨识CFD数据建立后缘动态偏转下的广义气动力模型，采用面元法计算模态运动、阵风引起的广义气动力，利用广义预测控制（GPC）方法设计阵风减缓控制律，在此基础上对变弯度后缘与传统铰链舵面动态气动力特性进行对比。仿真结果表明：基于变弯度后缘的GPC方法能够有效减缓由阵风引起的机翼翼尖加速度响应，翼尖加速度减缓效率为44.33%；相比传统铰链舵面，变弯度后缘偏转时弦向剖面上下表面压力分布更连续，相同舵偏下对机翼动态气动力影响更大，阵风响应减缓效率也更高，采用变弯度后缘进行阵风减缓具有更为广阔的应用前景。
Abstract:A mathematical model for gust response analysis is established for a wing with camber morphing trailing edges, and a simulation study of gust response alleviation is carried out. The computational fluid dynamics method is used to calculate the generalized unsteady aerodynamic force under the given dynamic morphing of the trailing edge, and the generalized aerodynamic force model under the dynamic deflection of the trailing edge is established based on the state observer method,. The panel method is used to calculate the generalized aerodynamic force caused by mode motion and gust, while the generalized predictive control (GPC) method is used in the design of gust alleviation control law. On this basis, the aerodynamic characteristics of the camber morphing trailing edge and the traditional hinged flap are compared. The simulation results show that the GPC method based on the camber morphing trailing edge can effectively alleviate the wing-tip acceleration response caused by gust, and the wing-tip acceleration reduction efficiency is 44.25%. The wing with morphing trailing edge has a more continuous pressure distribution on the upper and lower surfaces, a greater impact on the aerodynamics, and higher acceleration reduction efficiency. The use of camber morphing trailing edges for gust alleviation has a broader application prospect.
-
图 5 变弯度后缘偏转广义模态气动力辨识结果
Figure 5. Identification result of generalized modal aerodynamic force of trailing edge deflection
图 6 不同后缘运动幅值气动力预测
Figure 6. Aerodynamic prediction of different trailing edge motion amplitudes
图 7 闭环阵风响应减缓仿真结果
Figure 7. Simulation results of closed-loop gust response alleviation
图 8 铰链舵面与变弯度后缘动态气动力对比
Figure 8. Comparison of aerodynamic forces between hinged flap and camber morphing trailing edge
图 9 铰链舵面偏转广义模态气动力辨识结果
Figure 9. Identification result of generalized modal aerodynamic force of hinged flap deflection
图 10 铰链舵面闭环阵风响应减缓仿真结果
Figure 10. Simulation results of closed-loop gust response alleviation based on hinged flap
表 1 前4阶模态频率
Table 1. Frequency of the first four modes
模态阶数 模态描述 模态频率/Hz 1 机翼面外一弯 2.77 2 机翼面内一弯 13.45 3 机翼面外二弯 16.31 4 机翼一扭 20.25 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 网格无关性计算
Table 2. Grid-independent computing
网格名称 网格数量 升力系数 Coarse 420万 0.091 8 Medium 538万 0.083 2 Fine 631万 0.083 4
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] RIVERO A E, FOURNIER S, MANOLESOS M, et al. Experimental aerodynamic comparison of active camber morphing and trailing-edge flaps[J]. AIAA Journal, 2021, 59(7): 2627-2640. [2] 祝连庆, 孙广开, 李红, 等. 智能柔性变形机翼技术的应用与发展[J]. 机械工程学报, 2018, 54(14): 28-42.ZHU L Q, SUN G K, LI H, et al. Intelligent and flexible morphing wing technology: A review[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2018, 54(14): 28-42(in Chinese). [3] HUNTLEY S J, WOODS B K, ALLEN C B. Computational analysis of the aerodynamics of camber morphing: AIAA 2019-2914[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2019. [4] NGUYEN N T, CRAMER N B, HASHEMI K E, et al. Progress on gust load alleviation wind tunnel experiment and aeroservoelastic model validation for a flexible wing with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap system: AIAA 2020-0214[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2020. [5] TAL E A, NGUYEN N T. Unsteady aeroservoelastic modeling of flexible wing generic transport aircraft with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap: AIAA 2015-2722[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2015. [6] NGUYEN N, TING E, LEBOFSKY S. Aeroelastic analysis of a flexible wing wind tunnel model with variable camber continuous trailing edge flap design[C]//AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition. Reston: AIAA, 2015: 1405. [7] TING E, CHAPARRO D, NGUYEN N, et al. Optimization of variable-camber continuous trailing-edge flap configuration for drag reduction[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2018, 55(6): 2217-2239. doi: 10.2514/1.C034810 [8] HERRERA C Y, SPIVEY N D, LUNG S, et al. Aeroelastic airworthiness assessment of the adaptive compliant trailing edge flaps[C]//Proceedings of the 46th Society of Flight Test Engineers International Symposium, 2015: 14-17. [9] KOTA S, FLICK P, COLLIER F S. Flight testing of FlexFloilTM adaptive compliant trailing edge[C]//54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2016: 0036. [10] 陈磊, 吴志刚, 杨超, 等. 多控制面机翼阵风减缓主动控制与风洞试验验证[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(12): 2250-2256. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2009.12.002CHEN L, WU Z G, YANG C, et al. Active control and wind tunnel test verification of multi-control surfaces wing for gust alleviation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(12): 2250-2256(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.2009.12.002 [11] DHILEEP K, KUMAR D, GHOSH S, et al. Numerical study of camber morphing in NACA0012 airfoil: AIAA 2020-2781[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2020. [12] ULLAH J, LUTZ T, KLUG L, et al. Active gust load alleviation by combined actuation of trailing edge and leading edge flap at transonic speeds: AIAA 2021-1831[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2021. [13] 顾宁, 陆志良, 郭同庆, 等. 阵风响应及减缓的非定常数值模拟[J]. 航空计算技术, 2012, 42(3): 49-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2012.03.013GU N, LU Z L, GUO T Q, et al. Gust response and alleviation analysis of airfoil[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2012, 42(3): 49-53(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-654X.2012.03.013 [14] 许晓平, 祝小平, 周洲, 等. 基于CFD方法的阵风响应与阵风减缓研究[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2010, 28(6): 818-823. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2010.06.003XU X P, ZHU X P, ZHOU Z, et al. Further exploring CFD-based gust response and gust alleviation[J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2010, 28(6): 818-823(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2758.2010.06.003 [15] ZAIDE A, RAVEH D. Numerical simulation and reduced-order modeling of airfoil gust response[J]. AIAA Journal, 2006, 44(8): 1826-1834. doi: 10.2514/1.16995 [16] 张伟伟, 叶正寅, 杨青, 等. 基于ROM技术的阵风响应分析方法[J]. 力学学报, 2008, 40(5): 593-598. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2008.05.003ZHANG W W, YE Z Y, YANG Q, et al. Gust response analysis using CFD-based reduced order models[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2008, 40(5): 593-598(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2008.05.003 [17] 杨国伟, 王济康. CFD结合降阶模型预测阵风响应[J]. 力学学报, 2008, 40(2): 145-153. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2008.02.001YANG G W, WANG J K. Gust response prediction with CFD-based reduced order modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2008, 40(2): 145-153(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0459-1879.2008.02.001 [18] 聂雪媛, 杨国伟. 基于CFD降阶模型的阵风减缓主动控制研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4): 1103-1111.NIE X Y, YANG G W. Gust alleviation active control based on CFD reduced-order models[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4): 1103-1111(in Chinese). [19] 杨阳, 杨超, 吴志刚, 等. 考虑舵机时滞的阵风减缓主动控制律设计[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2020, 46(12): 2236-2244. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0635YANG Y, YANG C, WU Z G, et al. Design of gust alleviation active control law considering the time-delay of servo actuator[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2020, 46(12): 2236-2244(in Chinese). doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0635 [20] DAI Y T, YANG C. GPC-based gust response alleviation for aircraft model adapting to various flow velocities in the wind tunnel[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 2015: 348971. [21] MOULIN B, KARPEL M. Gust loads alleviation using special control surfaces[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(1): 17-25. doi: 10.2514/1.19876 [22] 刘晓燕. 基于非定常气动力降阶模型的气动弹性研究[D]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学, 2011: 25-33.Liu X Y. Aeroelastic rearch based on unsteady aerodynamic reduced order model[D]. Beijing: Beihang University, 2011:25-33(in Chinese). -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 350
- HTML全文浏览量: 59
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
