留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

自动驾驶水平对驾驶行为稳定时间的影响分析

翟俊达 鲁光泉 陈发城

翟俊达,鲁光泉,陈发城. 自动驾驶水平对驾驶行为稳定时间的影响分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2024,50(11):3477-3483 doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0863
引用本文: 翟俊达,鲁光泉,陈发城. 自动驾驶水平对驾驶行为稳定时间的影响分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2024,50(11):3477-3483 doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0863
ZHAI J D,LU G Q,CHEN F C. Effect analysis of automation levels on stabilization time of driving behaviors[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(11):3477-3483 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0863
Citation: ZHAI J D,LU G Q,CHEN F C. Effect analysis of automation levels on stabilization time of driving behaviors[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2024,50(11):3477-3483 (in Chinese) doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0863

自动驾驶水平对驾驶行为稳定时间的影响分析

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0863
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52131204)
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:lugq@buaa.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: U491

Effect analysis of automation levels on stabilization time of driving behaviors

Funds: National Natural Science Foundation of China (52131204)
More Information
  • 摘要:

    紧急事件发生后,不同自动驾驶水平下驾驶人的状态恢复对交通安全有重要影响。为研究自动驾驶水平对紧急事件后驾驶人工作负荷和驾驶绩效稳定时间的影响,提出了基于样本均值置信区间的信号稳定时间计算方法,设计并开展了手动驾驶(MD)、自适应巡航控制(ACC)和高级自动驾驶(HAD)3个自动驾驶水平与前车制动、前车换道2种紧急事件的模拟驾驶试验。试验有效被试者为53人,结果表明,相比于MD,HAD条件下2种紧急事件的心率稳定时间平均增加了4.56 s。自动驾驶水平对前车制动紧急事件后车辆速度、合成加速度和车道位置标准差稳定时间的影响均不显著,相比于MD,ACC和HAD条件下,前车换道紧急事件后驾驶绩效的稳定时间平均分别增加了3.2 s和5 s。研究成果对自动驾驶控制权切换模式和切换时刻的设计提供了理论依据。

     

  • 图 1  驾驶模拟器

    Figure 1.  Driving simulator

    图 2  心率稳定时间

    Figure 2.  Stabilization time of heart rate

    图 3  车辆速度稳定时间

    Figure 3.  Vehicle speed stabilization time

    图 4  车辆合成加速度稳定时间

    Figure 4.  Vehicle resultant acceleration stabilization time

    图 5  车道位置标准差稳定时间

    Figure 5.  Lane position standard deviation stabilization time

    表  1  被试者工作负荷稳定时间结果

    Table  1.   Participants’ workload stabilization time results

    自动驾驶水平 前车制动后
    心率稳定时间/s
    前车换道后
    心率稳定时间/s
    MD 14.56±4.41 15.38±5.846
    ACC 16.62±6.14 15.94±6.762
    HAD 18.75±6.41 20.31±6.839
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  被试者驾驶绩效稳定时间结果

    Table  2.   Participants’ driving performance stabilization time results

    自动驾驶水平 前车制动后车辆速度稳定时间/s 前车换道后车辆速度稳定时间/s 前车制动后合成加速度稳定时间/s 前车换道后合成加速度稳定时间/s 前车制动后车道位置标准差
    MD 15 13 19 15 16
    ACC 16 19 21 20 18
    HAD 20 20 18 25 20
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] SAE International. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles: SAE J3016-202104[S]. Warrendale: SAE International, 2021.
    [2] 吴超仲, 吴浩然, 吕能超. 人机共驾智能汽车的控制权切换与安全性综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2018, 18(6): 131-141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2018.06.014

    WU C Z, WU H R, LYU N C. Review of control switch and safety of human-computer driving intelligent vehicle[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2018, 18(6): 131-141(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1637.2018.06.014
    [3] 黄晶, 韦伟, 邹德飚. 基于个性化间距策略的自适应巡航系统模式切换策略研究[J]. 汽车工程, 2020, 42(10): 1302-1311.

    HUANG J, WEI W, ZOU D B. Research on multi-mode switching strategy of adaptive cruise control system based on personalized spacing strategy[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1302-1311(in Chinese).
    [4] NOY I Y, SHINAR D, HORREY W J. Automated driving: Safety blind spots[J]. Safety Science, 2018, 102: 68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.018
    [5] 鲁光泉, 陈发城, 李鹏辉, 等. 驾驶人跟车风险接受水平对其接管绩效的影响[J]. 汽车工程, 2021, 43(6): 808-814.

    LU G Q, CHEN F C, LI P H, et al. Effect of drivers’ acceptance level of car-following risk on the takeover performance[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2021, 43(6): 808-814(in Chinese).
    [6] LARSSON A F L, KIRCHER K, HULTGREN J A. Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.008
    [7] DAMBÖCK D, WEIßGERBER T, KIENLE M, et al. Requirements for cooperative vehicle guidance[C]//Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2013: 1656-1661.
    [8] RADLMAYR J, GOLD C, LORENZ L, et al. How traffic situations and non-driving related tasks affect the take-over quality in highly automated driving[J]. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2014, 58(1): 2063-2067. doi: 10.1177/1541931214581434
    [9] STANTON N A, YOUNG M S, WALKER G H, et al. Automating the driver’s control tasks[J]. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 2001, 5(3): 221-236. doi: 10.1207/S15327566IJCE0503_5
    [10] DE WINTER J C F, HAPPEE R, MARTENS M H, et al. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 196-217. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016
    [11] LU G Q, ZHAI J D, LI P H, et al. Measuring drivers’ takeover performance in varying levels of automation: Considering the influence of cognitive secondary task[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2021, 82: 96-110. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.005
    [12] STRAND N, NILSSON J, KARLSSON I C M, et al. Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 218-228. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.005
    [13] VOGELPOHL T, KÜHN M, HUMMEL T, et al. Transitioning to manual driving requires additional time after automation deactivation[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2018, 55: 464-482. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.019
    [14] MERAT N, JAMSON A H, LAI F C H, et al. Transition to manual: Driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.09.005
    [15] MELNICUK V, THOMPSON S, JENNINGS P, et al. Effect of cognitive load on drivers’ state and task performance during automated driving: introducing a novel method for determining stabilisation time following take-over of control[J]. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 2021, 151: 105967. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105967
    [16] PAMPEL S M, LARGE D R, BURNETT G, et al. Getting the driver back into the loop: The quality of manual vehicle control following long and short non-critical transfer-of-control requests: TI: NS[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2019, 20(3): 265-283. doi: 10.1080/1463922X.2018.1463412
    [17] DOGAN E, RAHAL M C, DEBORNE R, et al. Transition of control in a partially automated vehicle: Effects of anticipation and non-driving-related task involvement[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2017, 46: 205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.01.012
    [18] ULAHANNAN A, JENNINGS P, OLIVEIRA L, et al. Designing an adaptive interface: Using eye tracking to classify how information usage changes over time in partially automated vehicles[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 16865-16875. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966928
    [19] INAGAKI T. Adaptive automation: Sharing and trading of control[M]//HOLLNAGEL E. Handbook of cognitive task design. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 2003: 147-169.
    [20] YOUNG M S, BROOKHUIS K A, WICKENS C D, et al. State of science: Mental workload in ergonomics[J]. Ergonomics, 2015, 58(1): 1-17. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
    [21] 朱彤, 吴玲, 胡月琦, 等. 基于因子模型的高速公路特长隧道驾驶人心理负荷特性研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(11): 165-175. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.11.018

    ZHU T, WU L, HU Y Q, et al. Research on characteristics of drivers’ mental workload in extra-long expressway tunnels based on the factor model[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(11): 165-175(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.11.018
    [22] 汪旭. 基于心率增长率的山区复杂公路纵坡路段驾驶负荷试验研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2016.

    WANG X. Experimental research on the driving load of longitudinal section road in complex mountain highway based on the growth rate of heart[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2016(in Chinese).
    [23] 翟俊达, 鲁光泉, 陈发城, 等. 城市交叉口车路网联信息对青年驾驶人驾驶行为的影响分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2022, 40(1): 126-134. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.01.015

    ZHAI J D, LU G Q, CHEN F C, et al. Effects of information from connected vehicles and infrastructure on driving behavior of young drivers at urban intersections[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2022, 40(1): 126-134(in Chinese). doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2022.01.015
    [24] YERKES R M, DODSON J D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation[J]. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 1908, 18(5): 459-482. doi: 10.1002/cne.920180503
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  237
  • HTML全文浏览量:  98
  • PDF下载量:  5
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-10-30
  • 录用日期:  2022-11-25
  • 网络出版日期:  2022-12-16
  • 整期出版日期:  2024-11-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答