留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于SCACGAN的小样本齿轮箱故障诊断

王进花 刘秦玮 曹洁 陈莉

王进花,刘秦玮,曹洁,等. 基于SCACGAN的小样本齿轮箱故障诊断[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(3):713-723
引用本文: 王进花,刘秦玮,曹洁,等. 基于SCACGAN的小样本齿轮箱故障诊断[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(3):713-723
WANG J H,LIU Q W,CAO J,et al. Fault diagnosis of gearbox with small-sample based on SCACGAN[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(3):713-723 (in Chinese)
Citation: WANG J H,LIU Q W,CAO J,et al. Fault diagnosis of gearbox with small-sample based on SCACGAN[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(3):713-723 (in Chinese)

基于SCACGAN的小样本齿轮箱故障诊断

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0819
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(62063020,61763028);国家重点研发计划(2020YFB1713600);甘肃省自然科学基金(20JR5RA463)

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:wjh0615@lut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TP277;TH133.33

Fault diagnosis of gearbox with small-sample based on SCACGAN

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China (62063020,61763028); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFB1713600); Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (20JR5RA463)

More Information
  • 摘要:

    针对辅助分类器生成对抗网络(ACGAN)在小样本齿轮箱故障诊断过程中,生成故障样本缺乏多样性,且质量较差,导致诊断准确度不高的问题,提出一种基于自校正辅助分类器生成对抗网络(SCACGAN)的齿轮箱故障诊断方法。在辅助分类器生成对抗网络中引入一个独立的分类器,改善判别器输出错误对生成样本质量造成的不良影响,并对不同齿轮箱样本的健康状况进行分类;采用最小二乘函数,提高模型的生成能力和分类能力,改善训练过程中生成样本质量不高的问题;在生成器中引入自校正卷积神经网络,增强故障特征获取的能力。实验结果表明:在小样本条件下,所提方法能够生成质量较好的故障样本,从而提高了齿轮箱的故障诊断准确度。

     

  • 图 1  ACGAN结构

    Figure 1.  Architecture of ACGAN

    图 2  SCConv结构

    Figure 2.  Architecture of SCConv

    图 3  SCACGAN生成器结构

    Figure 3.  Architecture of SCACGAN generator

    图 4  SCACGAN的判别器和分类器

    Figure 4.  Discriminator and classifier of SCACGAN

    图 5  SCACGAN结构

    Figure 5.  Architectural of SCACGAN

    图 6  SCACGAN的小样本齿轮箱故障诊断流程图

    Figure 6.  Process diagram of SCACGAN for small-sample gearbox fault diagnosis

    图 7  康涅狄格大学的齿轮箱结构

    Figure 7.  Gearbox structure at the University of Connecticut

    图 8  齿轮的9个不同健康状况

    Figure 8.  Nine different health conditions of gears

    图 9  不同健康状况下的灰度图

    Figure 9.  Grayscale images under different health conditions

    图 10  基于SSIM的对比结果

    Figure 10.  Contrast results based on SSIM

    图 11  混淆矩阵图

    Figure 11.  Confusion matrix plot

    图 12  不同模型的特征散点图

    Figure 12.  Scatter plot of features for different models

    图 13  不同样本数量下的平均准确度和准确度标准差

    Figure 13.  Average accuracy and standard deviation under different sample sizes

    表  1  SCACGAN的生成器结构参数

    Table  1.   Generator structural parameters of SCACGAN

    网络层 结构参数 H×W×N
    Dense 2 048 2×2×512
    Conv1 (128,5,2) 4×4×128
    Conv2 (64,5,2) 8×8×64
    SCConv (32,5)(经过K1 8×8×64
    (32,5) (经过K2
    (32,5) (经过K3
    (32,5)(经过K4
    Conv3 (8,5,2) 16×16×8
    Conv4 (1,3,2) 32×32×1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  SCACGAN的判别器和分类器结构参数

    Table  2.   Discriminator and classifier structural parameters of SCACGAN

    模型 网络层 结构参数 输出尺寸
    判别器 Conv1 (16,5,2) 16×16×16
    Conv2 (32,3,2) 8×8×32
    Conv3 (64,3,2) 4×4×64
    Conv4 (128,3,2) 2×2×128
    Conv5 (256,3,1) 2×2×256
    Dense 1 1
    分类器 Conv1 (16,3,2) 16×16×16
    Conv2 (32,3,2) 8×8×32
    Conv3 (64,3,2) 4×4×64
    Conv4 (128,3,2) 2×2×128
    Conv5 (256,3,1) 2×2×256
    Dense 256 256
    Dense 128 128
    Dense 9 9
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  齿轮样品详情

    Table  3.   Gear sample details

    齿轮的健康状态分类标签
    健康0
    缺齿1
    齿根裂纹2
    剥落3
    碎屑尖端14
    碎屑尖端25
    碎屑尖端36
    碎屑尖端47
    碎屑尖端58
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  对比模型参数

    Table  4.   Comparison model parameters

    模型模块名称学习率
    LSTM[23]0.01
    CNN[24]0.01
    CGAN[25]生成器0.0002
    判别器0.0001
    ACGAN[18]生成器0.0003
    判别器0.0002
    WAC-GAN[19]生成器0.0003
    判别器0.0002
    SCACGAN生成器0.0001
    判别器0.0001
    分类器0.00001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHANG M, LI D C, WANG K S, et al. An adaptive order-band energy ratio method for the fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 165: 108336.
    [2] XUE S, HOWARD I, WANG C S, et al. Dynamic modelling of the gear system under non-stationary conditions using the iterative convergence of the tooth mesh stiffness[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105908.
    [3] RUAN D W, WANG J, YAN J P, et al. CNN parameter design based on fault signal analysis and its application in bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2023, 55: 101877.
    [4] JIA L S, CHOW T W S, YUAN Y X. GTFE-Net: a gramian time frequency enhancement CNN for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 119: 105794.
    [5] WANG S D, LIU Z B, JIA Z, et al. Composite fault diagnosis of analog circuit system using chaotic game optimization-assisted deep ELM-AE[J]. Measurement, 2022, 202: 111826.
    [6] YANG D G, KARIMI H R, SUN K K. Residual wide-kernel deep convolutional auto-encoder for intelligent rotating machinery fault diagnosis with limited samples[J]. Neural Networks, 2021, 141: 133-144.
    [7] LEI Y X, KARIMI H R, CHEN X F. A novel self-supervised deep LSTM network for industrial temperature prediction in aluminum processes application[J]. Neurocomputing, 2022, 502: 177-185.
    [8] ZHANG S Y, QIU T. Semi-supervised LSTM ladder autoencoder for chemical process fault diagnosis and localization[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 251: 117467.
    [9] JIN Z Z, HE D Q, WEI Z X. Intelligent fault diagnosis of train axle box bearing based on parameter optimization VMD and improved DBN[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2022, 110: 104713.
    [10] GAO S Z, XU L T, ZHANG Y M, et al. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis based on SSA optimized self-adaptive DBN[J]. ISA Transactions, 2022, 128: 485-502.
    [11] LI Y J, WANG Y B, ZHANG Y, et al. Diagnosis of inter-turn short circuit of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on deep learning and small fault samples[J]. Neurocomputing, 2021, 442: 348-358.
    [12] MAO W T, FENG W S, LIU Y M, et al. A new deep auto-encoder method with fusing discriminant information for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 150: 107233.
    [13] WANG Z S, XUAN J P. Intelligent fault recognition framework by using deep reinforcement learning with one dimension convolution and improved actor-critic algorithm[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2021, 49: 101315.
    [14] HE Z Y, SHAO H D, DING Z Y, et al. Modified deep autoencoder driven by multisource parameters for fault transfer prognosis of aeroengine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2021, 69(1): 845-855.
    [15] ZHOU F N, YANG S, FUJITA H, et al. Deep learning fault diagnosis method based on global optimization GAN for unbalanced data[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2020, 187: 104837.
    [16] DU Z M, CHEN K, CHEN S L, et al. Deep learning GAN-based data generation and fault diagnosis in the data center HVAC system[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2023, 289: 113072.
    [17] DU W Y, YANG J P, MENG G L. Fault diagnosis for dynamic system based on the independent latent space reconstruction of generative adversarial network[J]. Journal of Process Control, 2023, 125: 28-40.
    [18] ODENA A, OLAH C, SHLENS J. Conditional image synthesis with auxiliary classifier gans[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Sydney: PMLR, 2017: 2642-2651.
    [19] SUN Q, PENG F, YU X H, et al. Data augmentation strategy for power inverter fault diagnosis based on Wasserstein distance and auxiliary classification generative adversarial network[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023, 237: 109360.
    [20] 许小伟, 韦道明, 严运兵, 等. 基于改进ACGAN的永磁同步电机数据扩张方法[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2023, 55(10): 114-121.

    XU X W, WEI D M, YAN Y B, et al. Data expansion method of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on improved ACGAN[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2023, 55(10): 114-121(in Chinese).
    [21] 李慧芳, 徐光浩, 黄双喜. 基于主动生成式过采样和深度堆叠网络的轴承故障诊断[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2023, 29(1): 146-159.

    LI H F, XU G H, HUANG S X. Active generative oversampling and deep stacking network based bearing fault diagnosis approach[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 29(1): 146-159 (in Chinese).
    [22] MAO X D, LI Q, XIE H R, et al. Least squares generative adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2017: 2813-2821.
    [23] LEI J H, LIU C, JIANG D X. Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on long short-term memory networks[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 133: 422-432.
    [24] LI Y, ZHANG Y, LIU W, et al. A fault pattern and convolutional neural network based single-phase earth fault identification method for distribution network [C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia. Piscataway: IEEE press, 2019: 838-843.
    [25] MIRZA M, OSINDERO S. Conditional generative adversarial nets[EB/OL]. (2014-12-06)[2023-12-16]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784.
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3
  • HTML全文浏览量:  0
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-12-18
  • 录用日期:  2024-03-08
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-04-30
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-03-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答