横向非均匀积水对飞机滑水偏出跑道行为影响

李岳; 张耀华; 蔡靖; 任怡楠

doi:10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0845

横向非均匀积水对飞机滑水偏出跑道行为影响

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2023.0845

李岳¹,
张耀华¹,
蔡靖^{1, 2, ,},
任怡楠¹

1.
中国民航大学交通科学与工程学院，天津 300300
2.
民航机场智能建造与工业化工程技术研究中心，天津 300456

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52472369)；民航机场智能建造与工业化工程技术研究中心开放课题(MHJGKFKT-2025-01)

详细信息

通讯作者:
E-mail：caijing75@163.com

中图分类号: V351.11；U8
计量
- 文章访问数: 172
- HTML全文浏览量: 68
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-01-02
- 录用日期: 2024-02-23
- 网络出版日期: 2024-03-09
- 整期出版日期: 2026-03-31

Influence on veer-off behavior of aircraft hydroplaning due to transverse uneven water accumulation

LI Yue¹,
ZHANG Yaohua¹,
CAI Jing^{1, 2
, ,},
REN Yinan¹

1.
College of Transportation Science and Engineering，Civil Aviation University of China，Tianjin 300300，China
2.
Research Center of Airport Intelligent Construction and Industrialization Engineering Technology of Civil Aviation，Tianjin 300456，China

Funds:

General Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52472369); Open Topic for the Research Center of Airport Intelligent Construction and Industrialization Engineering Technology of Civil Aviation (MHJGKFKT-2025-01)

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail：caijing75@163.com

摘要

摘要:
机场道面积水受多重因素影响，非均匀分布特征显著，可导致飞机偏出跑道事故，仅以单一积水厚度指标表征能力不足。对此，建立飞机滑水偏出跑道行为理论模型，基于美国足尺加载试验开展飞机轮组滑水仿真分析，分段量化机场道面横向非均匀积水分布，对比两侧飞机轮组摩阻作用差异。提出一种非均匀积水临界长度评价指标，通过ADAMS整机运动学分析探讨飞机滑行轨迹及速度变化与评价指标关联，验证其合理性与适用性。结果表明：飞机在横向非均匀积水机场道面着陆时，两侧飞机轮组所受摩阻作用存在明显时程差异；飞机处于非对称偏转力交错影响之下，偏出跑道风险贯穿着陆滑行全过程；3组案例分析所得非均匀积水临界长度与理论值相差在6.6%以下，该指标可考察由横向非均匀积水引发的偏转作用累积影响，为起降安全保障及机场道面积水控制提供参考。
- 飞机轮组 /
- 轮胎滑水 /
- 非均匀积水 /
- 偏出跑道 /
- ADAMS
Abstract:
Accumulated water film on the pavement is unevenly distributed due to several factors, which may lead to an aircraft veer-off accident. The single index of water film thickness lacks the ability to characterize the water film distribution condition. In this paper, a theoretical model of the deviation behavior of aircraft hydroplaning was established. A hydroplaning simulation of an aircraft wheel group was carried out on the basis of the American full-scale test result of pavement loading. The transverse water film uneven distribution was quantified section by section. The differences in the frictional effect between both sides of aircraft wheel group were compared. It was suggested to use a new type of evaluation index called the critical length of unevenly distributed water film. The rationality and applicability of such an index were verified through a correlation study between critical length and aircraft taxing performance variation by using ADAMS-based kinematic analysis. The result indicated that notable differences exist between the time-history curve of the frictional effect between both sides of the wheel group in the case that the aircraft lands on the pavement with a transversely unevenly distributed water film. The entire landing procedure raised the likelihood of a veer-off mishap because asymmetric deviation forces constantly impact the aircraft's taxing performance. The critical length of uneven distributed water film derived from three study cases were merely 6.6% differed from theoretical results. The proposed evaluation index may take the accumulative impact of deviation forces due to transversely unevenly distributed water film into consideration, which may provide useful reference for take-off and landing safety protection and water distribution control on the pavement.
- aircraft wheel group /
- tire hydroplaning /
- uneven water accumulation /
- veer-off /
- ADAMS

HTML全文

图 1 飞机着陆滑行分析模型

Figure 1. Analytical model of aircraft landing and taxing

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 机场道面横断面变形曲线

Figure 2. Deformation curve of pavement transverse profile

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 飞机轮组滑水模型

Figure 3. Hydroplaning model of aircraft tire group

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 |R_p|和|F_h|时程曲线

Figure 4. Time history curves of |R_p| and |F_h|

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 |ΔR_p|和|ΔF_h|时程曲线

Figure 5. Time history curves of |ΔR_p| and |ΔF_h|

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 A320建模与ADAMS运动学模型

Figure 6. A320 modeling and ADAMS-based kinematic model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 均匀积水道面滑行轨迹及速度曲线

Figure 7. Taxing track and speed curves under even distributed water film pavement condition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 非均匀积水道面滑行轨迹及速度曲线

Figure 8. Taxing track and speed curves under uneven distributed water film pavement condition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 机场道面分段积水分布结果

Table 1. Water film distribution results of independent pavement sections

道面分段	分段变形量/mm	轻微积水时W_i/mm	中等积水时W_i/mm	重度积水时W_i/mm
D1	0.2	3.2	7.2	13.2
D2	6.2	9.2	13.2	19.2
D3	9.6	12.6	16.6	22.6
D4	9.8	12.8	16.8	22.8
D5	6.3	9.3	13.3	19.3
D6	1.6	4.6	8.6	14.6
D7	1.7	4.7	8.7	14.7
D8	2.2	5.2	9.2	15.2
D9	3.8	6.8	10.8	16.8
D10	6.6	9.6	13.6	19.6
D11	5.4	8.4	12.4	18.4
D12	3.3	6.6	10.3	16.3

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 飞机滑水偏出跑道行为案例参数组合

Table 2. Parameters combination of aircraft hydroplaning veer-off behavior cases

案例编号	积水条件	左轮组接地分段	右轮组接地分段	积水厚度差/mm	非均匀积水长度/m	L_cw理论值/m
案例1	中等积水	D3	D8	7.4	50	137
案例2	中等积水	D3	D8	7.4	750	137
案例3	中等积水	D1	D6	1.4	750	408

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	JIANG Y. Review on flight performance certification standard for wet and contaminated runway[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 17: 7-12.
[2]	YAN J, ZHANG H W, HUI B. Driving safety analysis using grid-based water-filled rut depth distribution[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 2021: 5568949.
[3]	赵安家, 孙丽莹, 孟哲理. 飞机轮胎滑水与预防控制措施研究综述[J]. 飞机设计, 2015, 35(5): 46-51. ZHAO A J, SUN L Y, MENG Z L. A search for mechanism and preventability measure of the aircraft tire hydroplaning[J]. Aircraft Design, 2015, 35(5): 46-51(in Chinese).
[4]	FWA T F, ONG G P. Wet-pavement hydroplaning risk and skid resistance: analysis[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2008, 134(5): 182-190.
[5]	TANG T C, ANUPAM K, KASBERGEN C, et al. A finite element study of rain intensity on skid resistance for permeable asphalt concrete mixes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 220: 464-475.
[6]	中国民用航空局飞行标准司. 航空承运人湿跑道和污染跑道运行管理规定: AC-121-FS-2009-33[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局飞行标准司, 2009. Flight Standards Division, Civil Aviation Administration of China. Regulations for the management of wet runway and contaminated runway operation by air carriers: AC-121-FS-2009-33[S]. Beijing: Flight Standards Division, Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2009(in Chinese).
[7]	燕姣, 李岩, 惠冰. 车辙断面非均匀积水对车辆安全性影响的仿真分析[J]. 汽车技术, 2019(11): 47-51. YAN J, LI Y, HUI B. Simulation analysis of rutting section unevenness with respect to vehicle driving safety[J]. Automobile Technology, 2019(11): 47-51(in Chinese).
[8]	FWA T F, PASINDU H R, ONG G P. Critical rut depth for pavement maintenance based on vehicle skidding and hydroplaning consideration[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 2012, 138(4): 423-429.
[9]	季天剑, 高玉峰, 陈荣生. 轿车轮胎动力滑水分析[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2010, 10(5): 57-60. JI T J, GAO Y F, CHEN R S. Dynamic hydroplaning analysis of car tire[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2010, 10(5): 57-60(in Chinese).
[10]	徐进, 彭其渊, 邵毅明. 直线路段积水路面车辆事故产生机理分析[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009, 22(1): 97-103. XU J, PENG Q Y, SHAO Y M. Mechanism analysis of vehicle accident on surface gathered water in straight sections[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(1): 97-103(in Chinese).
[11]	刘芳兵. 湿滑跑道飞机侧风着陆滑行安全研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2020: 45-47. LIU F B. Study on the safety of aircraft landing and taxiing in crosswind on wet runway[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020: 45-47(in Chinese).
[12]	宗辉杭. 基于轮辙道面飞机轮组滑水的积水评估指标研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2022. ZONG H H. Study on evaluation index of water accumulation in aircraft wheelset water skiing based on frog road surface[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2022(in Chinese).
[13]	黄文静, 吴密翠, 周晓飞. 使用反推力时飞机着陆滑跑距离的换算[J]. 飞行力学, 2003, 21(3): 56-58. HUANG W J, WU M C, ZHOU X F. Conversion method of landing distance under reverse-thrust conditions[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2003, 21(3): 56-58(in Chinese).
[14]	李岳, 宗辉杭, 蔡靖, 等. 飞机轮组滑水行为与道面积水附加阻力[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(5): 1099-1107. LI Y, ZONG H H, CAI J, et al. Hydroplaning behavior of aircraft wheel group and additional resistance due to accumulated water on pavement[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(5): 1099-1107(in Chinese).
[15]	徐长群, 陶超. 大型客机积水跑道起降附加阻力评估[J]. 民用飞机设计与研究, 2018(1): 98-103. XU C Q, TAO C. Additional drag assessment on standing water runways for large civil aircraft[J]. Civil Aircraft Design & Research, 2018(1): 98-103(in Chinese).
[16]	FAA Airport Technology Research & Development Branch. National airport pavement test facility[EB/OL]. (2020-04-12)[2023-12-27]. http://www.airport-tech.tc.faa.gov/naptf.
[17]	中国民用航空局. 民用机场道面评价管理技术规范: MH/T 5024—2019[S]. 北京: 中国民航出版社, 2019: 39-67. Civil Aviation Administration of China. Specification for pavement evaluation and management of civil airports: MH/T 5024—2019[S]. Beijing: China Civil Aviation Publishing House, 2019: 39-67(in Chinese) .
[18]	赵夫朋. 基于足尺轮辙试验的柔性道面力学性能评价指标研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2020. ZHAO F P. Study on evaluation index of mechanical properties of flexible pavement based on full-scale frog test[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020(in Chinese).
[19]	李岳, 胡宇祺, 蔡靖, 等. 基于变权重-正态云模型的飞机轮胎滑水风险[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(9): 2299-2305. LI Y, HU Y Q, CAI J, et al. Hydroplaning risk of aircraft tire based on variable weight theory-normal cloud model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(9): 2299-2305(in Chinese).
[20]	李岳, 周则圆, 蔡靖. 基于联系云的飞机轮胎滑水风险可拓评价模型[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(3): 705-711. LI Y, ZHOU Z Y, CAI J. Extensible evaluation model of aircraft tire hydroplaning risk based on connection cloud[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(3): 705-711(in Chinese).
[21]	宗辉杭, 李岳, 蔡靖, 等. 基于飞机滑水安全沥青道面积水评价指标[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2024, 50(3): 765-773. ZONG H H, LI Y, CAI J, et al. Evaluation index of asphalt road area water based on aircraft water skiing safety[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50(3): 765-773(in Chinese).
[22]	李少杰. 考虑不平衡摩阻的湿滑污染道面飞机着陆安全问题研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2020. LI S J. Study on landing safety of aircraft with wet and polluted road surface considering unbalanced friction[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020(in Chinese).
[23]	中国民用航空局飞行标准司. 民用航空飞行签派员执照和训练机构管理规则[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2009. Department of Flight Standards, Civil Aviation Administration of China. Management rules on licenses of civil aviation flight dispatchers and training organizations[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2009(in Chinese).
[24]	王裕, 刘卫, 张嘉振. 面向增材制造技术的民用飞机典型铰链结构拓扑优化设计[C]//第八届中国航空学会青年科技论坛. 北京: 中航出版传媒有限责任公司, 2018: 549-554. WANG Y, LIU W, ZHANG J Z. Topology optimization design of typical hinge structure of civil aircraft for additive manufacturing technology[C]//Proceedings of the 8th Youth Science and Technology Forum of the Chinese Society of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Beijing: AVIC Publishing and Media Co. , Ltd. , 2018: 549-554(in Chinese).
[25]	侯志礼, 王钢林. 某无人机着陆滑跑动态仿真分析[J]. 飞机设计, 2011, 31(5): 9-11. HOU Z L, WANG G L. Dynamic simulation of landing and rolling for a certain UAV[J]. Aircraft Design, 2011, 31(5): 9-11(in Chinese).
[26]	黄敬杰, 张鑫, 孟超, 等. 反推力装置对民航飞机减速性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(3): 728-734. HUANG J J, ZHANG X, MENG C, et al. Effect of thrust reverser on the deceleration performance of civil aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(3): 728-734(in Chinese).
[27]	国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 波音和空客系列飞机飞行品质监控项目规范: GB/T 26763—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China, Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Flight operational quality assurance events and deviation limits for Boeing and Airbus aircraft: GB/T 26763—2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012(in Chinese) .