留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度研究

韩维 韩啸华 苏析超 王刘松 吴浩南

韩维,韩啸华,苏析超,等. 两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(4):973-985
引用本文: 韩维,韩啸华,苏析超,等. 两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报,2026,52(4):973-985
HAN W,HAN X H,SU X C,et al. Research on integrated scheduling of shipboard helicopters sortie operation on amphibious assault ship[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(4):973-985 (in Chinese)
Citation: HAN W,HAN X H,SU X C,et al. Research on integrated scheduling of shipboard helicopters sortie operation on amphibious assault ship[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2026,52(4):973-985 (in Chinese)

两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度研究

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2024.0085
基金项目: 

中国科协青年人才托举工程

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    E-mail:suxich@126.com

  • 中图分类号: V355.2

Research on integrated scheduling of shipboard helicopters sortie operation on amphibious assault ship

Funds: 

Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST

More Information
  • 摘要:

    甲板作业调度是提升舰载机出动率的关键技术。针对两栖攻击舰舰载直升机群出动作业多阶段、高耦合特性,提出一种包含出库及甲板调运、机务勤务保障、出动离场在内的调度模型和优化算法。深入分析舰载直升机出动作业流程,基于各阶段的逻辑约束和资源约束,以最小化机群出动时间为优化目标,建立舰载直升机群出动作业一体化调度模型;将该问题转化为具有转移时间特征的资源受限项目调度问题,基于串行调度生成机制,设计一种两段编码的遗传-邻域搜索算法求解。通过对12架舰载直升机集中出动案例进行仿真实验,验证了调度模型和优化算法在优化出动流程方面的有效性,显著降低了机群出动准备时间,进一步发现机务勤务保障阶段的决策在全局调度中更为关键。

     

  • 图 1  舰载直升机出动作业流程

    Figure 1.  Process of shipborne helicopter sortie operation

    图 2  G-NSA 流程

    Figure 2.  G-NSA flow

    图 3  个体编码方案

    Figure 3.  Individual coding scheme

    图 4  停机位分配

    Figure 4.  Gate assignment

    图 5  保障人员分配

    Figure 5.  Support personnel assignment

    图 6  舰载直升机初始布列位置

    Figure 6.  Initial position of shipboard helicopters

    图 7  单机保障流程

    Figure 7.  Support process of single-helicopter

    图 8  舰载直升机调度甘特图

    Figure 8.  Gantt chart of shipboard helicopter scheduling

    图 9  保障人员调度甘特图

    Figure 9.  Gantt chart of personnel scheduling

    图 10  保障设备调度甘特图

    Figure 10.  Gantt chart of support equipment scheduling

    图 11  不同算法收敛曲线

    Figure 11.  Convergence curves of different algorithms

    表  1  停机位分配优先级

    Table  1.   Priority for gate assignment

    初始机位 目标机位
    A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 停机区Ⅰ 停机区Ⅱ
    C1 1 2 3 4 6 5 7 8
    C2 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 7
    停机区Ⅰ 1 2 3 4 5 6
    停机区Ⅱ 6 5 4 3 2 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  保障工序及对资源需求

    Table  2.   Guaranteed processes and resource requirements

    工序号 内容 设备 专业
    1 虚拟开始
    2 平台区机械检查 机械
    3 下部机械检查 机械
    4 旋翼展开 供电站 特设/机械
    5 航电外观检查 航电
    6 航电座舱检查 供电站 航电
    7 任务数据加载 供电站 特设/航电
    8 平台区特设检查 特设
    9 下部特设检查 特设
    10 特设座舱检查 供电站 特设
    11 燃油加注 加油站 机械
    12 惯导对准 航电
    13 军械外观检查 军械
    14 机载弹药挂载 军械
    15 虚拟结束
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同算法对比结果

    Table  3.   Comparison results of different algorithms

    算法 最小化机群出动时间/min 收敛到最优值的
    最小评价次数平均值
    平均值 最优值 方差
    G-NSA 76.7 75.9 0.958 2940
    GA 77.1 75.5 1.172 3749
    PSO 78.5 75.9 2.312 3724
    DE 79.8 78.1 0.733 2757
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  个体分段优化对比结果

    Table  4.   Comparison results of individual segment optimization

    算法 最小化机群出动时间/min 收敛到最优值的
    最小评价次数平均值
    平均值 最优值 方差
    G-NSA 76.7 75.9 0.958 2940
    G-NSA
    (第一段编码)
    83.5 82.3 0.776 1833
    G-NSA
    (第二段编码)
    77.7 76.7 1.231 3900
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 刘翱, 刘克. 舰载机保障作业调度问题研究进展[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(1): 49-60.

    LIU A, LIU K. Advances in carrier-based aircraft deck operation scheduling[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(1): 49-60(in Chinese).
    [2] WU Y, HU N, QU X J. A general trajectory optimization method for aircraft taxiing on flight deck of carrier[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2019, 233(4): 1340-1353.
    [3] LI Y T, WU Y, SU X C, et al. Path planning for aircraft fleet launching on the flight deck of carriers[J]. Mathematics, 2018, 6(10): 175.
    [4] 薛均晓, 孔祥燕, 郭毅博, 等. 基于深度强化学习的舰载机动态避障方法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2021, 33(7): 1102-1112.

    XUE J X, KONG X Y, GUO Y B, et al. Dynamic obstacle avoidance method for carrier aircraft based on deep reinforcement learning[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2021, 33(7): 1102-1112(in Chinese).
    [5] 刘洁, 董献洲, 韩维, 等. 采用牛顿迭代保辛伪谱算法的舰载机甲板路径规划[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2020, 54(9): 1827-1838.

    LIU J, DONG X Z, HAN W, et al. Trajectory planning for carrier aircraft on deck using Newton symplectic pseudo-spectral method[J]. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 2020, 54(9): 1827-1838(in Chinese).
    [6] LIU J, HAN W, WANG X W, et al. Research on cooperative trajectory planning and tracking problem for multiple carrier aircraft on the deck[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(2): 3027-3038.
    [7] 刘洁, 韩维, 徐卫国, 等. 基于滚动时域的舰载机甲板运动轨迹跟踪最优控制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 322842.

    LIU J, HAN W, XU W G, et al. Research on optimal path tracking control of carrier-based aircraft on the deck based on RHC[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8): 322842(in Chinese).
    [8] WANG X W, LI B, SU X C, et al. Autonomous dispatch trajectory planning on flight deck: a search-resampling-optimization framework[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 119: 105792.
    [9] 韩维, 刘子玄, 苏析超, 等. 结合启发式与最优控制的舰载机甲板路径规划算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(4): 1098-1110.

    HAN W, LIU Z X, SU X C, et al. Deck path planning algorithm of carrier-based aircraft based on heuristic and optimal control[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(4): 1098-1110(in Chinese).
    [10] 韩维, 崔荣伟, 苏析超, 等. 基于双种群模糊引力搜索算法的舰载机甲板作业调度[J]. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(11): 2751-2759.

    HAN W, CUI R W, SU X C, et al. Flight deck operations scheduling based on dual population fuzzy gravitational search algorithm[J]. Control and Decision, 2021, 36(11): 2751-2759(in Chinese).
    [11] CUI R W, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A dual population multi-operator genetic algorithm for flight deck operations scheduling problem[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 32(2): 331-346.
    [12] 苏析超, 韩维, 张勇, 等. 考虑人机匹配模式的舰载机甲板机务勤务保障调度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 222314.

    SU X C, HAN W, ZHANG Y, et al. Scheduling algorithm for maintenance and service support of carrier-based aircraft on flight deck with different man-aircraft matching patterns[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 222314(in Chinese).
    [13] SU X C, CUI R W, LI C J, et al. A heuristic solution framework for the resource-constrained multi-aircraft scheduling problem with transfer of resources and aircraft[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2023, 228: 120430.
    [14] 李亚飞, 高磊, 蒿宏杰, 等. 舰载机保障作业人机协同决策方法[J]. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2023, 53(12): 2493-2510.

    LI Y F, GAO L, HAO H J, et al. Man-machine cooperative decision-making method for carrier-based aircraft support operation [J]. Scientia Sinica Informationis, 2020, 53(12): 2493-2510(in Chinese).
    [15] 万兵, 苏析超, 郭放, 等. 不确定性工时下甲板作业的前摄性鲁棒调度[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 325971.

    WAN B, SU X C, GUO F, et al. Proactive robust scheduling of aircraft carrier flight deck operations with uncertain activity durations[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43(12): 325971(in Chinese).
    [16] 曾斌, 陈媛媛, 李厚朴. 考虑保障装备可用度的舰载机作业调度优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(7): 1856-1865.

    ZENG B, CHEN Y Y, LI H P. Launch scheduling optimization considering availability of maintenance equipment for carrier aircraft[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(7): 1856-1865(in Chinese).
    [17] YUAN P L, XIAO W, LI Z Y, et al. A robust optimization scheduling for carrier aircraft support operation based on critical chain method[J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 627(1): 012007.
    [18] SU X C, HAN W, WU Y, et al. A robust scheduling optimization method for flight deck operations of aircraft carrier with ternary interval durations[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6: 69918-69936.
    [19] SU X C, HAN W, WU Y, et al. A proactive robust scheduling method for aircraft carrier flight deck operations with stochastic durations[J]. Complexity, 2018, 2018: 6932985.
    [20] 范加利, 黄葵, 朱兴动, 等. 基于禁忌算法的舰载机甲板作业动态调度优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2023, 45(10): 3172-3182.

    FAN J L, HUANG K, ZHU X D, et al. Carrier aircraft deck operations dynamic scheduling optimization algorithm based on the tabu algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45(10): 3172-3182(in Chinese).
    [21] YUAN P L, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A dynamic scheduling method for carrier aircraft support operation under uncertain conditions based on rolling horizon strategy[J]. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(9): 1546.
    [22] 刘珏, 王能建, 罗旭, 等. 采用改进遗传算法的舰载机保障调度方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2020, 42(2): 194-205.

    LIU J, WANG N J, LUO X, et al. Deck operation scheduling method of carrier-based aircraft based on improved genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2020, 42(2): 194-205(in Chinese).
    [23] 袁培龙, 韩维, 苏析超, 等. 不确定环境下舰载机保障预反应式动态调度优化[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(6): 1265-1277.

    YUAN P L, HAN W, SU X C, et al. Predictive-reactive dynamic scheduling strategy for carrier aircraft support in uncertain environment[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(6): 1265-1277(in Chinese).
    [24] LIU Z X, HAN W, WU Y, et al. Automated sortie scheduling optimization for fixed-wing unmanned carrier aircraft and unmanned carrier helicopter mixed fleet based on offshore platform[J]. Drones, 2022, 6(12): 375.
    [25] 刘子玄, 万兵, 苏析超, 等. 基于HA算法的舰载机出动作业调度方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(5): 1691-1702.

    LIU Z X, WAN B, SU X C, et al. Dispatching operation scheduling method of carrier-based aircraft based on HA algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(5): 1691-1702(in Chinese).
    [26] 刘玉杰, 崔凯凯, 韩维, 等. 基于IPSO的舰载机出动离场规划研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2024, 46(4): 1337-1345.

    LIU Y J, CUI K K, HAN W, et al. Research on departure planning of carrier aircraft based on IPSO[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2024, 46(4): 1337-1345(in Chinese).
    [27] LIU J, HAN W, LI J, et al. Integration design of sortie scheduling for carrier aircrafts based on hybrid flexible flowshop[J]. IEEE Systems Journal, 2020, 14(1): 1503-1511.
    [28] 万兵, 韩维, 苏析超, 等. 基于CE-PF算法的舰载机离场调度优化问题[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 48(5): 771-785.

    WAN B, HAN W, SU X C, et al. A survey of carrier-based aircraft departure scheduling optimization problem based on CE-PF algorithm[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48(5): 771-785(in Chinese).
    [29] 万兵, 韩维, 梁勇, 等. 舰载机出动离场调度优化算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2021, 43(12): 3624-3634.

    WAN B, HAN W, LIANG Y, et al. Optimization algorithm of carrier-based aircraft sortie departure scheduling[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2021, 43(12): 3624-3634(in Chinese).
    [30] CUI J P, WU Y, SU X C, et al. A task allocation model for a team of aircraft launching on the carrier[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 2018: 7920806.
    [31] WU Y, WANG Y Y, QU X J, et al. Exploring mission planning method for a team of carrier aircraft launching[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(5): 1256-1267.
    [32] 郝桐, 黄斌, 何巍. 两栖攻击舰直升机出动回收流程分析[J]. 船舶工程, 2020, 42(5): 11-16.

    HAO T, HUANG B, HE W. Analysis of dispatch recovery process of helicopter on LHD[J]. Ship Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 11-16(in Chinese).
    [33] 李铭鑫. 基于UE4的舰载直升机机群调度优化及仿真研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2022: 21-34.

    LI M X. Research on scheduling optimization and simulation of shipborne helicopter fleet based on UE4[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2022: 21-34(in Chinese).
    [34] HAN W, WANG Y L, SU X C, et al. A multi-objective optimization problem research for amphibious operational mission of shipboard helicopters[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2023, 36(9): 256-279.
  • 加载中
图(11) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  381
  • HTML全文浏览量:  88
  • PDF下载量:  49
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-02-08
  • 录用日期:  2024-04-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-05-30
  • 整期出版日期:  2026-04-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    常见问答