飞机座舱工效学综合评价研究及其应用

李银霞; 杨锋; 王黎静; 袁修干

飞机座舱工效学综合评价研究及其应用

北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083

详细信息

作者简介:
李银霞(1974-),女,河南扶沟人,博士生, liyxmail@sina.com.

中图分类号: R 857
计量
- 文章访问数: 3776
- HTML全文浏览量: 212
- PDF下载量: 248
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2004-02-19
- 网络出版日期: 2005-06-30

Study on comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics and its application

School of Aeronautic Science and Technology, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 飞机座舱工效学综合评价是座舱研制中一个极其重要的问题.以往座舱研制过程中往往为其工程质量提出种种衡量标准而忽视了工效学综合评价,常导致设计出的座舱存在不少工效学方面的问题,原因在于没有合适的、可操作的评价方法和评价指标来指导座舱的工效学评价.针对此问题,提出了一种综合评价的方法体系.该体系能够实现征求和提炼专家群体的意见,考虑了工效学评价的模糊性,能较客观、科学的对飞机座舱工效学进行定量地综合评价,为比较类似设计方案的优劣提供了理论基础和方法.应用此方法,结合研究项目,对某型号飞机座舱尺寸设计的工效学进行了评价.评价结果得到了航空工程部门专家的认可.
- 座舱工效学 /
- 综合评价 /
- 人的因素 /
- 评价指标 /
- 权重系数
Abstract: Comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics plays key role in the new-type cockpit development. At previous period, during the development of aircraft cockpits, some judge standards were proposed in order to ensure design quality without allowing for ergonomics evaluation. There are not any appropriate and operational evaluation index and method to direct the cockpit ergonomics evaluation. This leaded to several problems conflicting with ergonomics in the cockpits design. In terms of these problems, a novel integrated approach was proposed. It is characterized with soliciting, synthesizing experts judgment, taking into account the fuzzy of ergonomics evaluation. Therefore this approach can be made the comprehensive evaluation of cockpit ergonomics more objectively and scientifically. This provided a theoretical basis and a practical method in order to compare different design schemes. Utilizing the method, the geometry ergonomics of an aircraft cockpit was evaluated roundly, and the results have the approval of aviation engineering experts.
- cockpit ergonomics /
- comprehensive evaluation /
- human factors /
- evaluation index /
- weight factors

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] Leo F Hickey, Wayne E, Springer. A development in cockpit geometry evaluation . The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington, 1969 [2] 王辉,武国城,刘保刚,等.航空工效学研究进展[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,1998,9(3):180~183 Wang Hui, Wu Guocheng, Liu Baogang, et al. Development of aviation ergonomic research[J]. China Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 1998,9(3):180~183(in Chinese) [3] 李银霞,袁修干.飞机驾驶舱人机几何适配性评价技术研究进展[J].人类工效学,2003,9(2):29~32 Li Yinxia, Yuan Xiugan. Development of the pilot/cockpit geometry compatibility evaluation research[J]. Renlei Gongxiaoxue Ergonomics, 2003,9(2):29~32(in Chinese) [4] 李银霞,袁修干,杨锋.飞机座舱工效多级模糊评价研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(3):50~53 Li Yinxia, Yuan Xiugan, Yang Feng. A multi-level fuzzy evaluation of the cockpit ergonomics[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2003, 13(3):50~53(in Chiese) [5] 郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2002.41~46 Guo Yajun. The theory and method of comprehensive evaluation[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2002.41~46(in Chinese) [6] 李银霞,袁修干,杨春信,等.歼击机座舱工效学综合评价指标体系的建立 .航空学报, 2005,26(2):148~152 Li Yinxia, Yuan Xiugan, Yang Chunxin, et al. Building of the index system for cockpit ergonomics comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005,26(2):148~152(in Chinese) [7] 陈伟.正确认识层次分析法(AHP法)[J].人类工效学,2000,6(2):32~35 Chen Wei. [J]. Remarks on analytical hierarchy process(AHP)[J]. Renlei Gongxiaoxue Ergonomics, 2000,6(2):32~35(in Chinese) [8] 荩垆. 实用模糊数学[M]. 北京:科学技术文献出版社,1989.73~77 Jin Lu. Practical fuzzing mathamatics[M]. Beijing:Scientific and Technical Literature Press, 1989.73~77(in Chinese) [9] 扎德 L A. 模糊集合、语言变量集模糊逻辑[M]. 陈国权译.北京:科学出版社,1984.63~82 Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning[M]. Translated by Chen Guoquan. Beijing:Science Press, 1984.63~82(in Chinese) [10] 李银霞,袁修干,杨锋.飞机座舱设计工效学综合评价系统的设计及实现 . 计算机应用研究, 2004,21(9):264~265 Li Yinxia, Yuan Xiugan, Yang Feng. Design and implementation of the ergonomic comprehensive evaluation system for cockpit design[J]. Application Research of Computers, 2004,21(9):264~265(in Chinese)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计