产品性能可靠性评估的时序分析方法

尤 琦; 赵 宇; 马小兵

产品性能可靠性评估的时序分析方法

北京航空航天大学工程系统工程系, 北京 100191

基金项目: 国家部委基金资助项目(914A19039106HK0108)

详细信息

中图分类号: TB 114.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 3466
- HTML全文浏览量: 32
- PDF下载量: 2086
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-08-10
- 网络出版日期: 2009-05-31

Performance reliability assessment for products based on time series analysis

Dept. of System Engineering of Engineering Technology, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, China

摘要

摘要: 针对航空航天产品高可靠性、长寿命的特点,通过综合时序模型对随机序列自拟合性强与短期预测精度高的优点,提出了两类基于性能退化数据的产品可靠性评估时序模型方法.首先,从性能退化量分布的角度出发,在假设退化量分布类型不随时间变化的前提下,利用时间序列建立了性能退化分布参数的分析模型,进而根据可靠度与性能退化量分布的关系进行可靠性评估.然后,从退化轨迹的角度出发,对所有样本的退化轨迹进行时序分析与建模,外推伪失效区间与伪失效寿命值,进而采用完全寿命试验数据的统计方法进行可靠性评估.最后,对某金属材料疲劳裂纹扩展数据进行可靠性评估与寿命预测,结果表明该方法具有良好的稳健性.
- 可靠性 /
- 时序模型 /
- 退化量分布 /
- 退化轨迹
Abstract: Time series model has the advantage of strong self-adjustment for stochastic process and high precision for prediction. For the high-reliability and long-life products in the field of aeronautics and astronautics, two methods based on time series model were proposed to evaluate reliability and predict lifetime using performance degradation data. Firstly, assuming that the degradation measure follows the same distribution family but its parameters may change with time. Non-stationary time series were used to fit distribution parameters. According to the relation between reliability and degradation measure distribution, the corresponding reliability functions were developed. Then, degradation paths of all samples were described by time series model. False failure interval and the false lifetime value could be predicted and reliability was obtained by statistical method from complete lifetime test data. Finally, the alloy fatigue crack data was used to evaluate reliability and predict lifetime,and the reasonable results show that the proposed method has better robustness.
- reliability /
- time series model /
- degradation measure distribution /
- degradation paths

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1] Sun Q, Zhou J L, Zhong Z, et al. Gauss-poisson joint distribution model for degradation failure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Sciences, 2004, 32(5):1864-1868 [2] Jayaram J S R, Girish T. Reliability prediction through degradation data modeling using a quasi-likelihood approach Proceedings Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium. New York: IEEE, 2005:193-199 [3] Huang W, Duane L. An alternative degradation reliability modeling approach maximum likelihood estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2005, 54(2):310-317 [4] Wilson S P, Taylor D. Reliability assessment from fatigue micro-crack data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1997, 46(2): 165-171 [5] Eghbali G. Reliability estimate using accelerated degradation data . New Brunswick: Department of Industrial and System Engineering, The State University of New Jersey, 2000 [6] Jiang M X, Zhang Y C. Dynamic modeling of degradation data Proceedings Annual Reliability & Maintainability Symposium. Washington: IEEE, 2002:607-611 [7] 邓爱民, 陈循, 张春华, 等. 基于性能退化数据的可靠性评估[J]. 宇航学报, 2006, 27(3):546-552 Deng Aimin, Chen Xun, Zhang Chunhua, et al. Reliability assessment based on performance degradation data[J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2006, 27(3): 546-552 (in Chinese) [8] Wei Huang, Dietrich D L. An alternative degradation reliability modeling approach using maximum likelihood estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2005, 54(2):310-317 [9] 陶庄, 金水高. 时间序列分析简明攻略[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2003, 20(3):151-153 Tao Zhuang, Jin Shuigao. The concise strategy of time series analysis[J].China Health Statistical, 2003, 20(3):151-153 (in Chinese) [10] 张艳, 黄敏, 赵宇, 等. 基于置信分布的系统可靠度评估蒙特卡罗方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 32(9):1023-1025 Zhang Yan, Huang Min, Zhao Yu, et al. Monte Carlo method for system reliability evaluation using reliability confidence distribution[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 32(9):1024-1025 (in Chinese) [11] Meeker M Q, Escobar L A. Statistical methods for reliability data[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计