Citation: | CHEN Ran, LIAN Guangyao, HUANG Kaoli, et al. Samples allocation method based on FMECA information for testability verification test[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017, 43(3): 627-635. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2016.0163(in Chinese) |
Sample allocation method of stratified sampling based on failure rate that is widely utilized in testability verification test considers only one single factor, which may lead to inaccurate assessment. Sample allocation method based on multiple factors is difficult to be used in engineering due to its limited representativeness. In this paper, the relation between factors that may influence the sample allocation and information provided by failure mode effect and critically analysis (FMECA) is analyzed in detail, and a sample allocation method based on FMECA information is presented. First, element influence coefficient and influence factor vector are defined and assignment rule of each element is put forward so that influence factors can be selected. Then, samples are allocated after the determination of weight matrix through analytic hierarchy process which is based on technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Finally, case study is conducted, indicating that the sample allocation method based on FMECA factors has a comprehensive consideration and a flexible application, which is more valuable in engineering.
[1] |
Department of Defense.Maintenance verification demonstration evaluation:MI-STD-471A[S].Washington, D.C.:U.S.Government Printing Office, 1973:2-8.
|
[2] |
石君友.测试性设计分析与验证[M].北京.国防工业出版社, 2011:282-286.
SHI J Y.Testability design analysis and verification[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2011:282-286(in Chinese).
|
[3] |
石君友, 康锐.基于通用充分性准则的测试性试验方案研究[J].航空学报, 2005, 26(6):691-695. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200506006.htm
SHI J Y, KANG R.Study on the plan of testability demonstration based on the general adequacy criterion[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(6):691-695(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200506006.htm
|
[4] |
石君友, 康锐, 田仲.基于信息模型的测试性试验样本集充分性研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2005, 31(8):874-878. http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10083.shtml
SHI J Y, KANG R, TIAN Z.Study on sufficiency of sample set in testability demonstration based on information model[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005, 31(8):874-878(in Chinese). http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10083.shtml
|
[5] |
徐萍, 康锐.考虑FDR的测试性测定试验及其相关方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2007, 33(3):357-360. http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9598.shtml
XU P, KANG R.Concept of testability determine test and relative method for FDR[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007, 33(3):357-360(in Chinese). http://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9598.shtml
|
[6] |
WANG C, QIU J, LIU G, et al.Testability evaluation using prior information of multiple sources[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(4):867-874. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2014.03.029
|
[7] |
李天梅, 邱静, 刘冠军, 等.基于故障扩散强度的故障样本选取方法[J].兵工学报, 2008, 29(7):829-833. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BIGO200807011.htm
LI T M, QIU J, LIU G J, et al.A method of failure sample selection based on failure pervasion intensity[J].Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(7):829-833(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BIGO200807011.htm
|
[8] |
李天梅, 邱静, 刘冠军.基于故障率的测试性验证试验故障样本分配方案[J].航空学报, 2009, 30(9):1661-1665. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200909019.htm
LI T M, QIU J, LIU G J.Allocation plan of failure samples based on failure rate in testability[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(9):1661-1665(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB200909019.htm
|
[9] |
赵建扬, 李小珉, 雷琴.基于危害度相对比值的故障样本分配方案[J].探测与控制学报, 2011, 33(2):55-59. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYX201102014.htm
ZHAO J Y, LI X M, LEI Q.Relative criticality ratio based on failure samples allocation[J].Journal of Detection & Control, 2011, 33(2):55-59(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYX201102014.htm
|
[10] |
何洋, 李洪涛, 王志新.基于多因子的机电设备测试性验证样本分配方案[J].电光与控制, 2015, 22(1):97-100. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGKQ201501022.htm
HE Y, LI H T, WANG Z X.A multi-factor based sample allocation scheme for testability verification of electromechanical equipment[J].Electronics Optics & Control, 2015, 22(1):97-100(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGKQ201501022.htm
|
[11] |
张西山, 黄考利, 敖贤野, 等.测试性验证试验中的故障样本综合加权分配方法[J].计算机测量与控制, 2015, 23(1):139-142. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZCK201501043.htm
ZHANG X S, HUANG K L, AO X Y, et al.Synthetic weighted method of failure samples allocation in testability[J].Computer Measurement & Control, 2015, 23(1):139-142(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JZCK201501043.htm
|
[12] |
邓露, 许爱强, 赵秀丽.基于故障属性的测试性验证试验样本分配方案[J].测试技术学报, 2014(2):103-107. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJS201402004.htm
DENG L, XU A Q, ZHAO X L.Allocation plan of samples based on failure attribute in testability demonstration test[J].Journal of Test & Measurement Technology, 2014(2):103-107(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSJS201402004.htm
|
[13] |
余思奇, 景博, 黄以锋.基于贡献度的测试性验证试验样本分配方案研究[J].中国测试, 2015, 41(2):91-95. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYCS201502023.htm
YU S Q, JING B, HUANG Y F.Study on allocation scheme of failure sample in testability validation tests based on contribution[J].China Measurement & Test, 2015, 41(2):91-95(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYCS201502023.htm
|
[14] |
Department of Defense.Procedures for performing a failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis:MIL-STD-1629A[S].Washington, D.C.:U.S.Government Printing Office, 1980:4-8.
|
[15] |
ARABIAN-HOSEYNABADI H, ORAEE H, TAVNER P J.Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines[J].International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2010, 32(7):817-824.
|
[16] |
COLLI A.Failure mode and effect analysis for photovoltaic systems[J].Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50:804-809.
|
[17] |
TAPIA C, DIES J, PESUDO V, et al.IFMIF accelerator:Database, FMEA, fault tree and RAM[J].Fusion Engineering & Design, 2011, 86(9-11):2722-2725.
|
[18] |
常春贺, 杨江平, 曹鹏举.基于研制信息的测试性验证试验方案研究[J].航空学报, 2012, 33(11):2057-2064. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201211014.htm
CHANG C H, YANG J P, CAO P J.Study on the scheme of testability demonstration test based on development information[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33 (11):2057-2064(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HKXB201211014.htm
|
[19] |
张朋程, 李伟娟.油企与地方关系和谐度评价[J].可持续发展, 2011, 1(1):1-5. doi: 10.12677/sd.2011.11001
ZHANG P C, LI W J.Appraise harmony about relationship between oil companies and local[J]. Sustainable Development, 2011, 1(1):1-5(in Chinese). doi: 10.12677/sd.2011.11001
|
[20] |
KILPELÄINEN A, PELTOLA H, RYYPPÖ A, et al.A hybrid method of FEM, modified NSGAⅡ and TOPSIS for structural optimization of sandwich panels with corrugated core[J].Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2014, 16(4):398-417. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274272004_A_hybrid_method_of_FEM_modified_NSGAII_and_TOPSIS_for_structural_optimization_of_sandwich_panels_with_corrugated_core
|
[21] |
VEGA A, AGUARÓN J, GARCÍA-ALCARAZ J, et al.Notes on dependent attributes in TOPSIS[J].Procedia Computer Science, 2014, 31:308-317. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.273
|
[22] |
SAATY T L.Basic theory of the analytic hierarchy process:How to make a decision[J].Revista De La Real Academia De Ciencias Exactas Físicas Y Naturales, 1999, 93(4):395-423.
|