Volume 45 Issue 11
Nov.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JU Pinghua, CHEN Zi, RAN Yan, et al. Improved FMEA method based on PROMETHEE in multi-granular probabilistic linguistic environment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(11): 2266-2276. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0142(in Chinese)
Citation: JU Pinghua, CHEN Zi, RAN Yan, et al. Improved FMEA method based on PROMETHEE in multi-granular probabilistic linguistic environment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, 45(11): 2266-2276. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0142(in Chinese)

Improved FMEA method based on PROMETHEE in multi-granular probabilistic linguistic environment

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2019.0142
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51835001

National Natural Science Foundation of China 51705048

National Science and Technology Major Program 2018ZX04032-001

National Science and Technology Major Program 2016ZX04004-005

More Information
  • Corresponding author: RAN Yan, E-mail: ranyan@cqu.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 01 Apr 2019
  • Accepted Date: 31 May 2019
  • Publish Date: 20 Nov 2019
  • With respect to some inherent drawbacks regarding failure mode evaluations, risk factor weights and risk priority ranking in traditional failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)method, an improved FMEA method based on preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (PROMETHEE) in multi-granular probabilistic linguistic environment was proposed. The multi-granular probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTS) were used to characterize the diversity and uncertainty of experts' assessment information, and a new linguistic computational model was developed based on the 2-tuple linguistic transformation formulas to unify the multi-granular risk assessment information provided by FMEA team members. Best-worst method (BWM) and the entropy weighting method were adopted to determine subjective and objective combined weights of risk factors. The PROMETHEEE was extended to probabilistic linguistic environment to determine the risk ranking of failure modes. Finally, an empirical case concerning the failure risk evaluation of tray automatic exchange device was presented to demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method, and sensitivity analysis and comparison study were also performed to show its merits.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CERTA A, ENEA M, GALANTE G M, et al.ELECTRE TRI based approach to the failure modes classification on the basis of risk parameters:An alternative to the risk priority number[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2017, 108:100-110. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=18c71a5383fb83df56ba8b19c9d54d02&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [2]
    LO H, LIOU J, HUANG C, et al.A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2019, 183:173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018
    [3]
    LIU H C, YOU J X, CHEN S, et al.An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty[J].IIE Transactions, 2016, 48(11):1027-1042. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1172742
    [4]
    HUANG J, LI Z, LIU H C.New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2017, 167:302-309. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014
    [5]
    杜晗恒, 彭翀.基于模糊TOPSIS的FMEA方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 42(2):368-374. https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13787.shtml

    DU H H, PENG C.Failure mode and effects analysis method based on fuzzy TOPSIS[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 42(2):368-374(in Chinese). https://bhxb.buaa.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13787.shtml
    [6]
    SAKTHIVEL G, IKUA B W.Failure mode and effect analysis using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and GRA TOPSIS in manufacturing industry[J].International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2017, 22(4):466-484. doi: 10.1504/IJPQM.2017.087864
    [7]
    WANG W Z, LIU X W, CHEN X Q, et al.Risk assessment based on hybrid FMEA framework by considering decision maker's psychological behavior character[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 136:516-527. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=4f06f35eb84e5f29e8c231ffe10a581a&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [8]
    耿秀丽, 邱华清.基于犹豫模糊PROMETHEE Ⅱ的设计方案群决策方法[J].计算机应用研究, 2018, 35(10):3020-3024. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2018.10.032

    GENG X L, QIU H Q.Group decision-making method of design concept based on hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEEⅡ[J].Application Research of Computers, 2018, 35(10):3020-3024(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3695.2018.10.032
    [9]
    LIU H C, YOU J X, DUAN C Y, et al.An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 207:163-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.03.008
    [10]
    王睿, 朱江洪, 李延来.基于直觉模糊MULTIMOORA的改进FMEA风险评估方法[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2018, 24(2):290-301. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsjjczzxt201802002

    WANG R, ZHU J H, LI Y L.Improved FMEA method for risk evaluation based on intuitionistic fuzzy MULTIMOORA[J].Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2018, 24(2):290-301(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsjjczzxt201802002
    [11]
    WANG Z L, YOU J X, LIU H C, et al.Failure mode and effect analysis using soft set theory and COPRAS method[J].International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2017, 10(1):1002-1015. doi: 10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.67
    [12]
    LIU H C, LI Z, SONG W, et al.Failure mode and effect analysis using cloud model theory and PROMETHEE method[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2017, 66(4):1058-1072. doi: 10.1109/TR.2017.2754642
    [13]
    NIE R X, TIAN Z P, WANG X K, et al.Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment[J].Knowledge-Based Systems, 2018, 162:185-201. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.030
    [14]
    RODRIGUEZ R M, MARTÍNEZ L, HERRERA F.Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making[J].IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.2012, 20(1):109-119. doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
    [15]
    PANG Q, WANG H, XU Z.Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making[J].Information Sciences, 2016, 369:128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021
    [16]
    YANG Z, WANG J.Use of fuzzy risk assessment in FMEA of offshore engineering systems[J].Ocean Engineering, 2015, 95:195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.11.037
    [17]
    ZHOU Y, XIA J, ZHONG Y, et al.An improved FMEA method based on the linguistic weighted geometric operator and fuzzy priority[J].Quality Engineering, 2016, 28(4):491-498. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1132320
    [18]
    REZAEI J.Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J].Omega, 2015, 53:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
    [19]
    DRAGAN P, GORAN C.The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC)[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(6):3016-3028. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
    [20]
    BRANS J P, VINCKE P, MARESCHAl B.How to select and how to rank projects:The PROMETHEE method[J].European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, 24(2):228-238. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
    [21]
    WU X, LIAO H.An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making[J].Information Fusion, 2018, 43:13-26. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2017.11.008
    [22]
    LIU P D, LI Y.The PROMTHEE Ⅱ method based on probabilistic linguistic information and their application to decision making[J].Informatica, 2018, 29(2):303-320. doi: 10.15388/Informatica.2018.169
    [23]
    张震, 郭崇慧.基于相对熵的多粒度不确定语言型群决策方法[J].大连理工大学学报, 2012, 52(6):921-927. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DLLG201206025.htm

    ZHANG Z, GUO C H.A multi-granularity uncertain linguistic group decision-making method based on relative entropy[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2012, 52(6):921-927(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DLLG201206025.htm
    [24]
    ZHANG Z, GUO C, MARTÍNEZ L.Managing multi-granular linguistic distribution assessments in large-scale multi-attribute group decision making[J].IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics Systems, 2017, 47(11):3063-3076. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=241e3f30c5b0807f70570998b38bc7c8&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
    [25]
    张发明, 袁宇翔, 梁龙武.多粒度不确定语言变量的多属性群决策方法及应用[J].系统管理学报, 2017, 26(6):64-73. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtgcllffyy201706008

    ZHANG F M, YUAN Y X, LIANG L W.Multi-attribute group-decision-making with multi-granularity uncertain linguistic variables and its application[J].Journal of Systems & Management, 2017, 26(6):64-73(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xtgcllffyy201706008
    [26]
    CHITSAZ N, AZARNIVAND A.Water scarcity management in arid regions based on an extended multiple criteria technique[J].Water Resources Management, 2017, 31(1):233-250. doi: 10.1007/s11269-016-1521-5
    [27]
    LIU P, YOU X.Probabilistic linguistic TODIM approach for multiple attribute decision-making[J].Granular Computing, 2017(12):1-10. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=03557ec62246248cd70aede9bc69f435&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(715) PDF downloads(318) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return