Similarity-based remaining useful life prediction method under varying operational conditions
-
摘要: 剩余使用寿命(RUL)预测是预测与健康管理(PHM)中的核心环节。提出一种变工况条件下基于相似性的RUL预测方法。结合相似性预测方法无需进行复杂的退化过程建模而能提供合理预测的优势,引入工况即设备工作时所处的环境或操作载荷等因素的影响来提升设备RUL预测准确性。对参考样本建立多工况的设备退化模型提升模型精度,在服役样本相似性度量预测中进行工况的匹配以实现在变工况下的RUL预测。方法能够更准确地描述实际工程中设备的退化过程和个体差异。依据相同准确度标准完成多组基本相似性方法和本文方法的对比实验结果表明,本文方法能够有效提高RUL预测准确度。
-
关键词:
- 剩余使用寿命(RUL) /
- 预测 /
- 工况 /
- 相似性 /
- 健康指标
Abstract: Remaining useful life (RUL) prediction is the core task of prognostic and health management (PHM). A similarity-based RUL prediction method under varying operational conditions was presented. Similarity-based RUL prediction method does not need to build a model for entire complex system but can provide reasonable results, which is promising in engineering practice. However, the operational conditions such as different working loads and environmental conditions are not considered for degradation modeling. Therefore, this method combines basic similarity-based method and the effect of operational conditions to achieve better RUL prediction accuracy. Degradation models with different operational conditions were built by training units, and the RUL prediction was achieved by matching corresponding model using the real-time operational conditions of the running unit. The proposed degradation models describe the degradation process more precisely by taking the differences of operational conditions into account. According to the same accuracy standard, multi-group numerical experiments were finished by basic similarity-based method and the proposed method. The result shows the proposed method has a higher accuracy in RUL prediction.-
Key words:
- remaining useful life (RUL) /
- prognostics /
- operational condition /
- similarity /
- health indicator
-
[1] DOYEN L,GAUDOIN O. Modeling and assessment of aging and efficiency of corrective and planned preventive maintenance[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2011,60(4):759-769. [2] HENG A,ZHANG S,TAN A C,et al. Rotating machinery prognostics: State of the art,challenge and opportunities[J].Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing,2009,23(3):724-739. [3] TANG D,MAKIS V,JAFARI L,et al.Optimal maintenance policy and residual life estimation for a slowly degrading system subject to condition monitoring[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015,134: 198-207. [4] VACHTSEVANOS G,LEWIS F,ROEMER M,et al. Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems[M].New Jersey:Wiley,2006:289-300. [5] LIAO L X,FELIX K.Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems,and an application to battery life prediction[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2014,63(1): 191-207. [6] SI X S,WANG W,HU C H,et al.Remaining useful life estimation:A review on the statistical data driven approaches[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2011,213(1): 1-14. [7] WANG T Y.Trajectory similarity based prediction for remaining useful life estimation[D].Cincinnati:University of Cincinnati,2010:39-56. [8] BIAN L,GEBRAEEL N,KHAROUFEH J P.Degradation modeling for real-time estimation of residual lifetimes in dynamic environments[J].ⅡE Transactions,2015,47(5):471-486. [9] YOU M,MENG G.A Framework of similarity-based residual life prediction approaches using degradation histories with failure,preventive maintenance and suspension events[J].IEEE Transactions on Reliability,2013,62(1):127-135. [10] ZHANG Q,TSE P,WAN X,et al.Remaining useful life estimation for mechanical systems based on similarity of phase space trajectory[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2015,42(5):2353-2360. [11] YOU M,MENG G.Toward effective utilization of similarity based residual life prediction methods:Weight allocation,prediction robustness,and prediction uncertainty[J].Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering,2013,227(1):74-84. [12] SAXENA A,GOEBEL K.Turbofan engine degradation simulation dataset[EB/OL].Washington,D.C.:NASA Ames Research Center,2008(2013-09-12).http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/prong-ostic-data-repository. [13] WANG T Y,YU J B,SIEGEL D,et al.A similarity-based prognostics approach for remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems[C]//2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management(PHM 2008). Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,2008:1-6. [14] 高占宝,李行善,梁旭,等. 工程系统健康描述及基于GFRF方法的健康监测[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2006,32(9):1026-1030.GAO Z B,LI X S,LIANG X,et al.Engineering system health formulation and health monitoring based on GFRF approach[J].Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2006,32(9):1026-1030(in Chinese). [15] LE S K,FOULADIRAD M,BARROS A,et al. Remaining useful life estimation based on stochastic deterioration models:A comparative study[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2013,112(4): 165-175. [16] XU J,WANG Y,XU L.PHM-oriented integrated fusion prognostics for aircraft engines based on sensor data[J]. IEEE Sensor Journal,2014,14(4):1124-1132. [17] HU C,YOU B,WANG P,et al.Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2012,103(3):120-135.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 922
- HTML全文浏览量: 81
- PDF下载量: 602
- 被引次数: 0