Volume 44 Issue 7
Jul.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Xuan, GUAN Zhidong, QIU Cheng, et al. Flexural performance of scarf repaired honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(7): 1528-1536. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0557(in Chinese)
Citation: GUO Xuan, GUAN Zhidong, QIU Cheng, et al. Flexural performance of scarf repaired honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(7): 1528-1536. doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0557(in Chinese)

Flexural performance of scarf repaired honeycomb sandwich structures

doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2017.0557
More Information
  • Corresponding author: GUAN Zhidong.E-mail:d5062010@163.com
  • Received Date: 01 Sep 2017
  • Accepted Date: 22 Dec 2017
  • Publish Date: 20 Jul 2018
  • The flexural behavior of scarf repaired honeycomb sandwich structures was investigated via experiments and finite element analysis. A three-point bending test was carried out on both undamaged and repaired specimens. Test results demonstrate that the failure mode is core shearing, and that the flexural strength recovery ratio of the repaired to the undamaged panels is 110%. The flexural rigidity of the repaired panel is slightly higher than that of the undamaged panel. Based on these results, a 3D finite element model was proposed to investigate the flexural behavior of the repaired specimens. Using VUSDFLD, we developed Hashin fabric and Besant failure criteria to achieve the damage initiation and evolution of composite and honeycomb materials. The failure pattern, the ultimate load and the calculated stiffness are in good agreement with the test results. Then the effect of the damage diameter and the thickness of the patch on the repaired panels was analyzed by changing the parameters of the FEM, and the results show that with the increase of the damage diameter from 30 mm to 70 mm, the ultimate loads of repaired specimens increase, then decrease, and finally reach the maximal value at the diameter of 50 mm; besides, the strength recovery ratio is larger than 100% while the thickness of the patch ranges from 1 mm to 2.5 mm. This study indicates that the numerical model developed provides an efficient method for repair design of composite honeycomb sandwich panels.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    杜善义, 关志东.我国大型客机先进复合材料应对策略思考[J].复合材料学报, 2008, 25(1):1-10. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fhclxb200801001

    DU S Y, GUAN Z D.Strategic considerations for development of advanced composite technology for large commercial aircraft in China[J].Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2008, 25(1):1-10(in Chinese). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=fhclxb200801001
    [2]
    SCOTTI S J, ClAY C, REZIN M. Structures and materials technologies for extreme environments applied to reusable launch vehicles: AIAA-2003-2679[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003: 1-10.
    [3]
    杜善义.先进复合材料与航空航天[J].复合材料学报, 2007, 24(1):1-12. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FUHE200701000.htm

    DU S Y.Advanced composite materials and aerospace engineering[J].Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2007, 24(1):1-12(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FUHE200701000.htm
    [4]
    NIU M C Y. Composite airframe structures[M]. [S. l. ]: Adaso Adastra Engineering Center, 1992: 56-73.
    [5]
    陈绍杰.复合材料结构修理指南[M].北京:航空工业出版社, 2001:37-185.

    CHEN S J.Composite structures repair guide[M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2001:37-185(in Chinese).
    [6]
    中国航天研究院.复合材料结构设计手册[M].北京:航空工业出版社, 2001:550-569.

    Chinese Aeronautical Establishment.Composite structures design manual[M].Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2001:550-569(in Chinese).
    [7]
    DUONG C N, WANG C H.Composite repair theory and design[M].Netherlands:Elsevier BV, 2007:105-134.
    [8]
    汪海, 陈秀华, 郭杏林, 等.复合材料蜂窝夹芯结构修理后强度研究[J].航空学报, 2001, 22(3):270-273. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hkxb200103013

    WANG H, CHEN X H, GUO X L, et al.Strength investigation of composite honeycomb structures after repair[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2001, 22(3):270-273(in Chinese). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hkxb200103013
    [9]
    李剑峰, 燕瑛, 廖宝华, 等.复合材料蜂窝夹芯结构单面贴补弯曲性能的分析模型与试验研究[J].航空学报, 2013, 34(8):1884-1891. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_hkxb201308014

    LI J F, YAN Y, LIAO B H, et al.Analysis model and experimental study of bending behavior of composite honeycomb sandwich structures with one-side bonded repair[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2013, 34(8):1884-1891(in Chinese). http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_hkxb201308014
    [10]
    邹建胜, 曾建江, 童明波, 等.不同夹芯复合材料夹层结构的剪切破坏行为[J].机械工程材料, 2012, 36(9):38-41. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90723X/201209/43196641.html

    ZOU J S, ZENG J J, TONG M B, et al.Shear damage behavior of composite sandwich plate with different cores[J].Materials for Mechanical Engineering, 2012, 36(9):38-41(in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90723X/201209/43196641.html
    [11]
    AVERY J L, SANKAR B V.Compressive failure of sandwich beams with debonded face-sheets[J].Journal of Composite Materials, 2000, 34(14):1176-1199. doi: 10.1177/002199830003401402
    [12]
    HANSEN I.Compression behavior of FRP sandwich specimen with interface debonded[J].Journal of Composite Materials, 1998, 32(4):335-360. doi: 10.1177/002199839803200402
    [13]
    TOMBLIN J S, SALAH L, WELCH J M. Bonded repair of aircraft composite sandwich structures: DOT/FAA/AR-03/74[R]. Washington, D. C. : Office of Aviation Research, 2004: 11-13.
    [14]
    中国国家标准化管理委员会. 夹层结构弯曲性能试验方法: GB/T 1456-2005[S]. 北京: 中国国家标准化管理委员会, 2005: 1-11.

    Standardization Administration of China. Testmethod for bending performance of sandwich structures: GB/T 1456-2005[S]. Beijing: Standardization Administration of China, 2005: 1-11(in Chinese).
    [15]
    刘遂, 关志东, 郭霞, 等.复合材料蜂窝加芯板挖补修理后的侧压性能[J].科技导报, 2013, 31(7):28-32. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJDB201307018.htm

    LIU S, GUAN Z D, GUO X, et al.Lateral compressive behavior of scarf repaired honeycomb sandwich panels[J].Science and Technology Review, 2103, 31(7):28-32(in Chinese). http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KJDB201307018.htm
    [16]
    HASHIN Z.Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composite[J].Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(2):329-334. doi: 10.1115/1.3153664
    [17]
    姜晓伟, 曾建江, 曾昭炜, 等.配合方式对复合材料单钉单剪螺栓连接接头刚度的影响及其机制[J].复合材料学报, 2016, 33(3):589-596. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96080X/201603/668343240.html

    JIANG X W, ZENG J J, ZENG Z W, et al.Influence and mechanism of fitting mode on stiffness of single-bolt, single-lap composite bolted joint[J].Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2016, 33(3):589-596(in Chinese). http://www.cqvip.com/QK/96080X/201603/668343240.html
    [18]
    国防科学技术工业委员会.飞机结构用芳纶纸基蜂窝芯材规范:GJB 1874-94[S].北京:国防科学技术工业委员会, 1994:1-13. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/word/dfa866353968011ca30091a5-1.doc
    [19]
    沈观清, 章怡宁.典型复合材料机翼铺层设计分析[J].航空学报, 1993, 14(10):467-471. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.1993.10.005

    SHEN G Q, ZHANG Y N.Alaminating design analysis for typical composite wing[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1993, 14(10):467-471(in Chinese). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6893.1993.10.005
    [20]
    冯雁, 郑锡涛, 吴淑一, 等.轻型复合材料机翼铺层优化设计与分析[J].航空学报, 2015, 36(6):1858-1866. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hkxb201506014

    FENG Y, ZHENG X T, WU S Y, et al.Layup optimization design and analysis of super lightweight composite wing[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(6):1858-1866(in Chinese). http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hkxb201506014
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(23)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(614) PDF downloads(428) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return